Preview

Who Is To Blame Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
906 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is To Blame Essay
Who Is To Blame?
As humans in search of friendship, love, and care we sometimes change ourselves in order to fit in with the people around us. Have you ever caught yourself copying your friends just because you did not want to be made fun of? Humans do not want to feel alone so we follow others even if their actions are wrong. If a person is born and raised in a neighborhood full of criminals that are stealing and killing every day, that person will eventually accept these actions as a way of life. When someone is around only criminal behavior he or she cannot be blamed for not following the accepted moral ways of life. Scientists have performed many experiments and studied real life scenarios concerning the relationship between situation and behavior to find out why good people do bad things. Two strong examples of situations concerning behavior based on context are the Standford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo and the work of Steven Stefanowicz as a contract interrogator in Abu Ghraib prison. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on prison behavior. This experiment consisted of ordinary college boys who were all emotionally and physically stable. The set up was very realistic allowing the subjects to remain in character. The realistic scenario manipulated the minds of prisoners making them believe they were truly bad people, and guards believed to have the right of intimidation and oppression. These boys were calm in natural surroundings, yet became mischievous and unpredictable when placed in the fake prison and told to act as a guard or prisoner. One of the more notable figures from this experiment was the guard known as John Wayne. John Wayne would punish the prisoners through embarrassment, and harsh physical activity. The prisoners knew it was going to be rough when John Wayne came around. Although the real John Wayne was the complete opposite. When visitor Christina Maslach watched the acts of the infamous John

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment took place during the summer of 1971 and was led by Stanford University professor, Philip G. Zimbardo (Zimbardo). The experiment was done to evaluate the psychological effects of guards and prisoners (prisonexp). In order to test this, Zimbardo decided to create a mock prison in a hall of the Stanford psychology building (prisonexp). This was a costly affair and to afford the experiment, Zimbardo was funded by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, who was also interested in the science behind the conflict between guards and prisoners (bbcprsionstudy). The Stanford Prison Experiment originally was conducted to study the relationship betweens guards and prisoners, but by the conclusion of the experiment it was obvious…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first impression from watching the film was the relationship between the study’s prisoners and guards seemed friendly at first. Though they’re encouraged by Zimbardo and his associates to take the experiment seriously and to invest themselves fully in their roles, the subjects initially still understand that they’re not really in a prison but then, the experiment takes a turn when a guard named Christopher Archer begins to embrace a meaner personality one, in which I suspect from watching the experiment, is not his normal demeanor but, rather, a more boosted version of himself of which he perceives to be his role. Archer introduces an element of meanness to the proceedings, altering the prisoners’ mindset the prisoners start to feel dehumanization…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, the study went on to become one of the best-known in psychology's history. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram (who is best-known for his famous obedience experiment), was interested in expanding on Milgram's research. "Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place—would their goodness triumph?" said Zimbardo in one interview. The researchers set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building. The participants were chosen from a group of 70 volunteers because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues, and had no significant medical conditions. The volunteers agreed to participate during a one to two-week period in exchange for $15 a day.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the New York Times bestselling author Maria V. Snyder once said, “Trusting is hard. Knowing who to trust, even harder.” Often we misjudged people, and sometimes we place our trust in the wrong person. It is all to easy too place your trust in someone and have them lead you astray. This is true for the title characters in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. The young couple trusted Romeo’s confessor, Friar Lawrence, but it ended up being that trust that got them in trouble. Friar Lawrence, who was constantly giving them bad advice, didn't think his plans through, and didn't always put the couple’s well being first, and married them, is the individual most responsible for the tragic deaths of Romeo…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s well-known play write, Romeo and Juliet, star-crossed lovers suffer a tragic ending. Romeo and Juliet come from feuding families that would never allow their love, but they love each other anyways. Although, when Juliet tried to see her newly-wed husband, Romeo, things turn for the worse and they both die together. However, the question remains, who was the main cause of the deaths of Romeo and Juliet? Friar Laurence is the main cause of the deaths of Romeo and Juliet for these reasons: Friar Laurence could have gotten information to Romeo quicker, he married Romeo and Juliet when he knew it would cause trouble, and he gave Juliet the idea to fake her death to be with Romeo.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, there have been many tragedies cause by roamance. For example, the play Romeo and Juliet by, William Shakespeare is known for its romantic tragedy between two star-crossed lovers. With all the deaths, who is truly to blame for Romeo and Juliet's deaths? Friar Laurence is most to blame for many obvious, yet overlooked reasons.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    zimbardo

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The prison experiment discussed in this video involves a group of male college students who were later spilt into two completely different roles, prisoners and guards. This experiment, done in Stanford University, was supposed to last two weeks, but only lasted about four to the duress and severity the “prisoners” were put through. Dr. Zimbardo conducted the experiment in such a manner where everything was realistic; they formed a mock prison in the basement of a psychology building, the students were arrested as if actual criminals, and they were given uniforms depending on whether they were prisoners or guards.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 3402 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Just under half the book (chapters 2-9, 192 pages) is a description of the Stanford Prison Experiment, followed by another two chapters of reflection on the events during the experiment. There is now a website dedicated to the Stanford Prison Experiment at prisonexp.org so I won’t give a detailed summary of the experiment here. Suffice it to say that from a group of young male volunteers some were chosen at random to act as prison guards and the rest to act as prisoners in a pretend prison in the psychology department basement. The experiment had been due to last two weeks but Zimbardo abandoned it on the tenth day because of the worsening treatment of the "prisoners" by the "guards."…

    • 3402 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The line between good and evil is permeable and almost anyone can be induced to cross it when pressured by situational forces.” Said Philip Zimbardo. The Stanford Prison Experiment helped solve many mysteries about forensic psychology and how good, normal people, can turn evil. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychologically intense experiment that affected the lives of normal, mentally healthy, students who were brought into interference with situational forces.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Stanford prison experiment was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University from August 14 to August 20 of 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. Philip Zimbardo is commonly known as the father of social psychology. He is also the author of the Lucifer Effect.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays