Preview

Who Is Judge Lawrence Wargrave Guilty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Judge Lawrence Wargrave Guilty
Judge Lawrence Wargrave on the stand for the mass murder on Soldier Island. How shall you plea “ Guilty of the murder of ten people”. Now to say the people on the island were guilty themselves. He knew he had done wrong and therefore killed himself as well. Knowing all those people died for no other reason but someone else's enjoyment is wrong and Wargrave is guilty.
Ever since Judge Lawrence Wargrave was a child he had a thing for seeing and causing death. He had a tormented mind. He himself could not kill the innocent for that was his tragic flaw. So he found a loophole and wanted to kill the guilty, but were the people on the island were really guild of the same crime. If they were wouldn't they have been in jail or giving the death penalty. That is not at all the way Wargrave saw it he had seen people get away with murder and they deserved to die, but he was wrong. He made a
…show more content…
He had convinced Dr. Armstong into helping him fake his death after he had gotten away with everyone being murdered he found it was to obvious that he was the only one alive. He had wrote a confession letter as of to why he had done what he did.Knowing he was wrong to some people but right in his eyes. In his letter he confessed saying “I have wanted . . . to commit a murder myself. I recognized this as the desire of the artist to express himself! . . . But—incongruous as it may seem to some—I was restrained and hampered by my innate sense of justice. The innocent must not suffer.”. He had finally gotten what he had wanted in life and pretty much did get away with murder. Paying the price of taking a life come with losing your own. Once the police came and saw what Wargrave did the were surprised and shocked that someone with such power could lose sight of what is the right thing to do. Guilty of nine individual murders and a suicide of himself he was better off dead than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In chapter four Justice Wargrave, who is accused of the murder of Edward Seton, says that Seton was a murderer who he had passed his sentence on. Vera who is accused of the murder of Cyril Hamilton, tells everyone that she was his nursery governess, and he drowned because he swam out too far. General Macarthur, who is accused of the murder of Arthur Richmond, tell everyone that Richmond was one of his officer who was killed on a reconnaissance. Macarthur also states that his wife did not have an affair. Lombard who is accused of killing the members of an East African tribe, admits to everyone he stole their food to save himself.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, I am Jack Oberman, and I have the privilege today to prove Mr Rainsford guilty of assault and third degree murder without any reasonable doubt. According to Mr. Rainsford’s witness statement, he fell off of a ship and swam all the way onto the island. He then met Mr. Zaroff and henchman Ivan. Mr. Rainsford claimed they hunted humans on this island. Rainsford then says Zaroff forced him into being hunted. During the period of the 3 nights he managed to evade Zaroff, alleged hunter. In the process of evading Zaroff he attempted to kill Zaroff in self defense, but in the process killed Ivan and one of Zaroff’s hounds. After the 3 nights were up, the supposed end game, Rainsford swam around to the other end of the island, climbed into Zaroff’s room, and killed him.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Horshoe Crab

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A.) The three seamen should be subject to penalties under English criminal law in terms of offering compensation to the boy’s parents in terms of remedies. The defendants’ actions were necessary due to the fact that they needed to eat in order to survive and defeat the deathly grip of the elements. In addition, the act of killing the boy was unethical, however if they did not assist in relieving the boy of death, the boy would have died anyway.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, Judge Longfellow, find Ned Kelly guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. Firstly, I have heard that at the Stringybark Creek shootout, the Kelly Gang only wanted to take the guns and horses. Ned Kelly had absolutely no intension of shooting the police but he did so in self defence. Secondly, I have heard that the Kelly family have been harassed. Whenever a cow or a horse has gone missing, the police have straight away accused Ned Kelly or someone else in his family. Finally, I have heard that Constable Fitzpatrick went into the Kelly’s house to arrest Dan Kelly without a warrant. This constant harassment has no doubt forced this young man down the path of crime. The evidence directs me to find Ned Kelly guilty of the lesser charge…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although some believe that Captain Vere should have sentenced Billy to death. Although Billy was his friend, he needed to establish justice. Following the code, Captain Vere had to sentence Billy to death for what he had done. By deciding this, it discouraged the chance of mutiny among the sailors. The jury’s verdict was guilty.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The verdict of this case in my opinion is guilty but insane. I believe he knew that the action was wrong as he admitted that he had the premeditation to kill the police officer as well getting rid of his weapon. To me this indicated that he knew his actions were wrong, plus by fleeing the scene. If I were ruling this case, I would recommend that this particular criminal be admitted to an institution so he can be treated and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This builds up the dilemma between the law and conscience. Laws is what keeps the society from falling apart and most people think of the law as something good for the society and that law is only used for good reasons. However, in some cases the law is unjust and could indeed affect someone's life. During the trial Vere uses many arguments that apply during the time of war. Billy's life was something very important and it was sacrificed for nothing. In many courts of law, there are many things that can carry the weight in the consideration of the action like motivation and intention. In this case the jury knows that Billy did not commit this crime on purpose, but they have to conform to Vere’s reliance on the military justice and they not take into account intention or motivation in this case. Not only did Billy's silence during the case made it worst, but the jury makes the decision on condemning an innocent person without even taking his situation into…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do people like O.J. Simpson get away with murder? Ever since mankind roamed the Earth, murder has been a part of life. Once we became civilized it was considered a serious crime. With the adoption of the court system, we have developed legal defenses that justify taking another person’s life. Defense attorneys have come up with very convincing arguments that let sadistic killers get away with murder. It takes a unanimous decision of twelve jurors to result in a conviction, and only one to “rock the boat.” As described in these six different murder cases, all it takes to persuade one person to vote not-guilty is a clever defense.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleading not guilty doesn’t always mean you didn’t do it. In this piece, an 18 year old girl on trial for murder decides to defend not the fact that she murdered someone, but rather that her reason was justified. As she tells her side of the story, the jury is forced to decide whether she's innocent or guilty; and whether it can truly be in someone's genetics to kill.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The London Charter in 1945 saw the Allies again meet to decide the proceedings for the subsequent war crimes trials including the hastily approaching British trial at Belsen and the Nuremberg Trial in November of 1945. The charter laid out the three categories of crimes that individuals could be tried for; Crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. As Justice Lawrence, the British representative at the Nuremberg Trial, saw it, the charter ‘laid down that aggressive war was a crime, that breaches of the law were crimes and that crimes against humanity committed in connection with an aggressive war was a crime.’ The three categories of crime and the agreement on the proceedings of such trials aimed to correct the mistakes of trials in World War One, where the trials were handed over to Germany who acquitted criminals or gave more lenient sentences, and aimed to create a new system for future war crimes trials. The charter however was not brought about without problems. Discussions over the methods and procedures were widely publicised in the press; there was a large debate surrounding the use of the ‘Anglo-American’ legal system or the ‘continental’ procedures. In The Times, the day after the Allied Declaration in London on the 8th August 1945, on page eight, the respondent raises the issue of mutual concession; ‘of course one price to pay of such international…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charge Negotiation

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Edward Lee is significant because it shows that the process of Charge Negotiation can be abused to punish someone for a crime, even if they had not committed it. It was the 2nd time in NSW where a judge has refused to accept a manslaughter plea. Justice Hulme’s decision was applauded and attorney-general Chris Hartcher said it was “wonderful to see the court taking a firm stand”.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They must be able to understand and know the laws very well to hold the position of a judge for a career. The character of Justice Wargrave, has always been for justice and had instincts for legal profession. In the epilogue of the novel, Justice Wargrave writes the confession letter of what he had done on Indian island, then he puts the letter in a bottle and throws it away in the sea for anyone to find. In the letter, Wargrave states, "I have a reputation as a hanging judge, but that is unfair. I have always been strictly just and scrupulous in my summing up of a case" (Christie 352). In his statement, he gives his world that he has always been a fair judge. Justice Wargrave claims to have great knowledge of criminals and which sometimes seem to mislead the jury. He gave justice to Edward Seton, a character who was tried for murder, by sentencing him to death even when the jury did not find any evidence against him. Wargrave tends to take matter in his own hands for self administered justice. After all the cases he as went through in his career as a judge, Justice Wargrave knows what justice…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jason. "Guilty" in this context refers to the person who is responsible for the tragedy of four deaths.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice has several definitions. One is the administering of deserved punishment or reward. Another one is the quality of being fair and reasonable. In the mind of Wargrave, everyone on the island deserved the punishment of death. Emily Brent wouldn’t allow Beatrice Taylor back in her house after she got pregnant. Beatrice Taylor then felt guilty and abandoned so she committed suicide. Although Emily Brent did not physically harm her, Justice Wargrave found her guilty. Dr. Armstrong operated, while intoxicated, on a patient and she ended up dying. This was a careless act by Armstrong but it was not a intentional one; yet, he was still found guilty by the judge. These deaths are truly the main theme of death. Another theme of justice in the story is the fact the Justice Wargrave…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays