Preview

White Southerners In The 1940s

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
728 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
White Southerners In The 1940s
During the years between 1960-1970, there was an increase in involvement of white southerners in the Republican Party compared to the previous years of whites in the Democratic Party. This is seen as a result of a southern strategy of Conservative Republicans to centralize their campaign towards the Southern United states by appealing to racism against African Americans. “By isolating white southerners as carriers of the racist gene…the southern strategy narrative understates the role of racial reaction on the right.” Not only did they pursue southerners, but also those in the North and West who were dissatisfied with the Democratic Party; a majority of whom did not agree with the ideals set in place by the New Deal, which transformed the …show more content…
As this withdrawal takes place, Thurmond and his followers move over to the Republican Party. “He [Thurmond] quit the Democratic Party at high mark of the civil rights revolution…and led a historic shift of white southerners into the GOP.” This switch was greatly brought on by a document written by President Harry Truman’s Civil Rights Committee, To Secure These Rights. This report called for an end to discrimination, both racially and economically, the desegregation of all public facilities, the passing of an anti-lynching law, as well as various ideals to create a more equal living environment between whites and …show more content…
He argued, “The FEPC was made to order for communist use in their designs upon our national security.” Thurmond drew this idea from Stalin’s “All-Races Law” that was passed in Soviet Russia. Because three of his opponents supported the idea of racial equality in the workplace, Thurmond concluded that communistic ideas had penetrated the United States government. While this belief was seen to have the threat of Communism as its basis, Thurmond used it as one of many ways to bash the FEPC. President Roosevelt signed the FEPC in 1941 and it lit a fire under the battle for racial equality in the work place, which became a defining issue in the Civil Right’s movement. Thurmond argued that this order interfered in the matters of private business owners by forcing them to hire employees they didn’t want; mainly African Americans, and added on to his opposition of desegregation of all public
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Did The Democratic Party Characterize The 'Reconstruction Law' By Thomas Nast?
    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did The Democratic Party Characterize The 'Reconstruction Law' By Thomas Nast?

    Thomas Nast expressed the ideas of oppression among Black American citizens during the process of reconstruction. In other words, the Democratic party were looked upon as a devious group in their attempt to deprive black American citizens of their important American liberties as their constitutional rights were slowly being stripped away in the south. For example, in his drawing’s, he demonstrated that the democratic party were made up of three wings that directly opposed the “reconstruction legislation” of the union. These factions gained a reputation for resisting the movement of equal opportunity and were at fault for dismantling the progression of emancipation. Therefore, racism played a heavy role in exercising an outlet to segregate…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 9981 Analysis
    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Executive Order 9981 Analysis

    After the war, President Harry Truman, Roosevelt's successor, was faced with countless discrimination issues and problems; many directly caused by the issuance of Executive Order 8802 in 1941. To alleviate the stress and to appease the general consensus on discriminatory issues, Truman allowed Congress to terminate the FEPC; Fair Employment Practices Commission issued by his predecessor Roosevelt “directing that blacks be accepted into job-training programs” (Yon, NP). Shortly following this decision, in 1946, Truman formed a panel to serve as the President's Commission on Civil Rights. The new appointed panel duties included establishing "more adequate means and…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Was War a Catalyst for the Development of Civil Rights in the United States in the Period 1877 to 1981?
    • 2766 Words
    • 12 Pages

    To What Extent Was War a Catalyst for the Development of Civil Rights in the United States in the Period 1877 to 1981?

    At the beginning of the 1870s Blacks had caught a glimpse at the end of the tunnel for the development of Civil Rights. With the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862 followed by the 13th and 14th Amendment freed slaves could now travel freely, own property and become educated, some of the most fundamental of civil rights. However after the release of three and a half million slaves into American society it would be some time before this declaration would become reality. In the south slaves continued to work for white landowners under new share cropping scheme, education and political activism remained low resulting in not a single senate holding a black majority. Blacks remained, in the eyes of many southerners ‘a perfectly stupid race’ that ‘can never rise to a very high plane’ President Thedore Roosevelt. However over the following centaury Civil Rights changed dramatically with the Spanish – America War, First World War, Second World War, Cold War and the War in Vietnam. Further change was also due to the rising support for Negro rights groups and the pushing by congress for an increase in Civil Rights.…

    • 2766 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cruel Hand Chapter Summary
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cruel Hand Chapter Summary

    In “The Cruel Hand,” Anderson examines the threat to the status quo of inequality that the Civil Rights movement posed with the incredible progress in education, voting, as well as employment that were made; also within chapter four, she focuses on the role that the Nixon and the Reagan eras played in undermining the black progress that had been made during the Civil Rights movement and in fueling “white rage.” Both the Nixon and Reagan administrations were able to execute two fairly significant tasks to crush the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Acts of 1965. The first way was through reclaiming the narrative of the Civil Rights movement; and, the second way was by redefining racism itself.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Fair Employment Act (1992)
    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Fair Employment Act (1992)

    On June 25, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed an executive order known as Fair Employment Act, the order prohibited racial discrimination by all federal agencies, unions, and companies engaged in war-related work (Sidlo & Kleiner,1992). It also resulted in the establishment of the Fair Employment Practices Commission to ensure the order was carried out. Fair Employment Act was implemented at a time when large numbers of black Americans were frequently met with violence and unfair employment practices while trying to find jobs in the growing war industry. African American leaders met with Eleanor Roosevelt threatened to organize a march on Washington, DC if the president failed to intervene (Sidlo & Kleiner,1992). President Roosevelt…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Republicans won all the Presidential elections between 1896 and 1908
    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Republicans won all the Presidential elections between 1896 and 1908

    For long-term factors, since the end of the American Civil War, the republicans gained popularity with African-Americans. Campaigns led by Book T. Washington and William Du Bois aimed to advance rights and freedom for African-Americans and achieved greater equality and access to legal rights, freedom and education. As Washington established relations with white politicians like Republican President Roosevelt, and with northern philanthropists who provided capital for education enhancement for the African-Americans, where the North is mostly dominated by Republicans and the South (who still remained black hatred and tried to degrade African-Americans) mainly dominated by Democrats, the Republicans gained much popularity with…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Reconstruction in the South Till 1960
    • 5015 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Reconstruction in the South Till 1960

    Immediately following the civil war, there was great controversy over what to do with the states that attempted secession from the United States. It was clearly not as simply as reinstating their statehood, as this would send the message that not cooperating with the federal government is acceptable. In order to facilitate the reentry of the states into the union, an era of reconstruction ushered in. This would be a time of many ambitious efforts by congress to expand the civil rights of African-Americans. It proved to be a failed effort, overall, because little permanent change occurred. Although reconstruction did manage to raise great controversy and spark some change, it was ultimately a failure, for African-Americans, despite having laws put in place to grant them civil rights, failed to achieve long-term racial integration. It also proved to be short-lived, and its collapse in the mid-1870s, would have immense impact on the future of the south well into the 20th century.…

    • 5015 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    African-Americans During Reconstruction
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    African-Americans During Reconstruction

    Since the Reconstruction Era was after the civil war which abolished slavery, many “blacks relished the opportunity to demonstrate their liberation from the regulations, significant and trivial, associated with slavery.”[1] One big difference between the African-Americans being slaves and free, was the fact that they were legally allowed to vote. Frederick Douglass, a former slave during this time, said, “slavery is not abolished until the black man has the ballot.”[2] This shows how important it was for African- Americans to be able to vote during this time. It was a major symbol and representation of how free they are. This is because they would have a say in the politics, which affect the whole country. Foner describes this by saying, “In…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Great Men Analysis
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Great Men Analysis

    Furthermore, as he chooses to present a White-centered narrative that pays little attention to both the ideas and the methods of the civil rights activist, he diminishes the historical importance of African American activists in transforming the United States by making it both politically and socially more inclusive. The “Great Men” narrative that Lawson utilizes fails to present the complexity of the civil rights movement and the resilience of the activist, who, despite the numerous setbacks they suffered, continued to fight for their rights. By not paying any attention to the grassroots, Lawson creates a false picture of racial and social progress. He implicitly suggests that having a more or less amicable administration in place would be sufficient to maintain or advance the interests of historically marginalized groups. That is unfortunate, particularly because the article was published at the turn of the century, long after conservative forces had begun to dismantle some of the hard-won reforms. Consequently, a more inclusive approach that depicts the essential groundwork before and after the national leaders of the movement negotiated legislative reforms with the national government, would have been warranted.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Rise Of Southern Politics Analysis
    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Rise Of Southern Politics Analysis

    Now Republicans constitute most of the South’s congressional delegations. The emergence of Southern Republicanism helped bring back the competitive aspect of presidential elections coupled with the revitalization of the South, its’ senators and representatives. The old regime of Southern politics in the South is viewed as “transparently undemocratic and thoroughly racist” (muse.jhu.edu). The Southern political structure was designed to block out the Negro population and threatened influences from the outside. By protecting white supremacy and the segregation amongst races pertaining to party affiliation, southern democrats condoned racial injustice for generations to…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Liberal Republican Argumentative Analysis
    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Liberal Republican Argumentative Analysis

    After Reconstruction the states that resided in the north were primarily Liberal Republican. This was due from Lincoln’s association with the Republican Party, and the role he had on equal treatment for blacks during the Civil War (Boles pg. 570). Also, the term liberal is associated with the progressive party, which means looking forward. In contrast, the south was primarily Conservative Democratic, with the term conservative associated with being stuck in old ways of doing things. This implies that they did not agree upon the equal opportunities among blacks and whites, because they viewed blacks more as servants. This way of thinking stemmed from before the Civil War, when slavery was still in common practice. So, one of the main divisions between the two parties was the issue on race. Today the south is largely associated with the Conservative Republican platforms, and the north being associated with the Liberal Democratic platforms. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the South transitioned from this solidly Democratic region to one that is today largely recognized as solidly Republican, through the platforms of key politicians had on…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War: The Wilmington Uprising
    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Civil War: The Wilmington Uprising

    What had formerly been ruled by Democratic hardliners was now governed by equally radical Republicans intent on changing the ways of the South. One of the primary goals of Reconstruction was to integrate blacks into Southern society and readmit the states that seceded, but only after blacks had won full political and civil equality (Wormser, “Reconstruction”). This, however, did not align with the idea that most Southern leaders at the time held, and there was an obvious backlash to the Republican…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did African Americans Influence The Government
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did African Americans Influence The Government

    Following the Civil War, the Republican party controlled every branch of power in the government (McPherson, 601). This political party emphasized its desire for racial and social equality; therefore, they gave African Americans official positions in the Southern government (Foner, 159). Despite racist ideologies, white politicians willingly shared some of their power with African Americans. What motivated white officials to share their power with African Americans? Were their choices genuine, or simply a way to push their political agenda to punish the South?…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    African Americans During Reconstruction
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    African Americans During Reconstruction

    The question of black representation among the government was addressed immediately. However the issue was under jurisdiction of President Andrew Johnson, who was a Southerner and also thought that African Americans shouldn't have a role in Reconstruction, American Historian, Robert Cruden said of Johnson, "His Jacksonian philosophy had perhaps an even greater flaw in view of the problems he confronted: it had some place for the Negro as a free man, but it had none for him as an equal"1. During the Presidential Reconstruction, 1865-1867, Johnson appointed provisional governors and ordered them to call state conventions in order to establish new, all white, governments in the South. These new all white governments looked similar to the confederate governments they had replaced, In an essay by Steven Hahn he said of black representation in the south, "Outside of South Carolina, they show, blacks never dominated either the executive, legislative, or judiciary always remained under white control"2 . Johnson's third annual message to congress in December, 1867 depicted his prejudice, he said of the African Americans that they had, "shown less capacity for government than any other race of people. No independent government of any form has ever been successful in their hands. On the contrary, wherever they have been left to their own devices, they have shown a constant tendency to relapse into barbarism"3. Even though during Reconstruction there were many black people holding both federal and state offices during reconstruction.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Class Conflict In Southern Politics
    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Class Conflict In Southern Politics

    In addition, during the 1960s, most partisan change in the South was accounted for by people from outside of the South (Converse 1966). These Northern transplants tended to live in urban areas near the growing technological industries. Therefore, urban areas were the first areas to shift towards Republicans. In sum, during the 1960s, Northern transplants accounted for almost all change in aggregate partisanship in the South. The shift of northerners to the South was caused by economics (Shafer and Johnston 2006). People fled other areas of the nation looking for a better life in the South. The evidence that partisanship has become more Republican because of immigration from other more Republican parts of the nation has not been found to be the only driver of partisan change. There was also a class-based shift among natives of the South (Nadeau and Stanley 1993). Native whites would not be expected to show changes in partisanship if the results were only from immigration to the South. In fact, data suggest that migrants were more likely in the mid-2000s to vote for Democrats than were native southerners. Studies also show that migrants to North Carolina increasingly identify and register as unaffiliated voters rather than Republicans. This study also shows that unaffiliated voters were more likely to vote for Barack Obama in 2008 than natives of North Carolina (Hood and…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics