White Man's Burden Imperialism
Racism is a concept where a certain race of people is more superior than the other by the color of a persons skin. This concept is 100% not true a human no matter what race should be treated the same period. But, as we all know history says otherwise. Rudyard Kipling ( the author of The White Man’s Burden ) believes that it is the white mans responsibility to go help other countries that they conquer. He thinks when a white man takes up his burden that there are no benefits for the white man. But, that is not entirely true it shows that when a white man takes up his burden that the country is great. It makes other powerful countries look at it as a great country just like them. Imperialism is where a country extends its power through diplomacy or military force. In the poem Kipling talks about how some countries need to be rescued and we are doing them a favor by going abroad. I do not agree with this because how do you know if the people are really struggling and how do you know they want your help. The White Man’s burden is interesting to me because when a white man takes up his burden
…show more content…
First world mean that are developed, capitalist, and are industrial countries. Third world is a tricky one because many people think all third world countries are poor but that is incorrect. Third world countries are basically any developing country. The whole “World inside the world” concept is not that great of a system in my opinion. I think that because it makes it sounds like a second or third world countries are not important which is false. The Europeans used a system called direct rule, which basically means they oversaw everything and natives were placed in an entirely subordinate role. They were basically bullies and took what they want and just started to take control of the people. It made it so the natives had to follow the European
First world mean that are developed, capitalist, and are industrial countries. Third world is a tricky one because many people think all third world countries are poor but that is incorrect. Third world countries are basically any developing country. The whole “World inside the world” concept is not that great of a system in my opinion. I think that because it makes it sounds like a second or third world countries are not important which is false. The Europeans used a system called direct rule, which basically means they oversaw everything and natives were placed in an entirely subordinate role. They were basically bullies and took what they want and just started to take control of the people. It made it so the natives had to follow the European