What Were The Effects Of Japanese Internment Camps
One of the most unforgettable war in history caused an outburst of questions of the Japanese internment camps. During 1940, before the United States entered World War Two, they secretly helped the Allies, mainly the United Kingdom, through the Lend-Lease Act by transporting army supplies which were a hefty help for boosting morale. A year after, Japan aircrafts surprised attack Pearl Harbor and eventually lead the United States to join World War Two. On February 19, 1942 the Executive Order 9066 was put into action which made internment camps for Japanese Americans, German Americans, and Italian Americans. These camps lead to incarceration between race, necessary trials, and the aftermath of the Judicial Branch. Due to the Executive Order 9066 many of Japanese, German, and Italian descent were forced to relocate into camps. Since the Pearl Harbor incident, the order affected the Japanese Americans the most because they were thought of as horrible race and many people feared them during the time. As the number of people entering the camps increased from hundreds to thousands, their human rights were strictly reduced. For example, they could not have done things such as owning
…show more content…
Cases such as: Yasui v. United States, Hirabayashi v. United States, Korematsu v. United States were significant cases. The court cases conflicted about the curfews and internment camps reasoning if the implementations were constitutional or not. Yasui, Hirabayashi, and Korematsu refused to relocate into internment camps and took the cases into Supreme Court. As they argued about their rights throughout the Constitution, the main argument was about implementing the Executive Order through constitutional reasonings. Although all three cases were overruled, the court ruled that curfew during war times and the exclusion order to lead the internment camps were
Cases such as: Yasui v. United States, Hirabayashi v. United States, Korematsu v. United States were significant cases. The court cases conflicted about the curfews and internment camps reasoning if the implementations were constitutional or not. Yasui, Hirabayashi, and Korematsu refused to relocate into internment camps and took the cases into Supreme Court. As they argued about their rights throughout the Constitution, the main argument was about implementing the Executive Order through constitutional reasonings. Although all three cases were overruled, the court ruled that curfew during war times and the exclusion order to lead the internment camps were