Preview

what is the third estate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
what is the third estate
WHAT IS THE THIRD ESTATE?
Abbe Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes As an ambitious clergyman from Chartres, Abbe Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes was a member of the First Estate. Yet Sieyes was elected deputy to the Estates General for the Third Estate on the basis of his attacks on aristocratic privilege. He participated in the writing and editing of the great documents of the early revolution: the Tennis Court Oath, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. The pamphlet for which he is immortalized in revolutionary lore was his daring "What Is the Third Estate?" Written in January 1789, it boldly confronted the bankruptcy of the system of privilege of the Old Regime and threw down the gauntlet to those who ruled France. In this document the revolution found its rallying point. 1st. What is the third estate? Everything.
2nd. What has it been heretofore in the political order? Nothing.
3rd. What does it demand? To become something therein.... Who, then, would dare to say that the third estate has not within itself all that is necessary to constitute a complete nation? It is the strong and robust man whose one arm remains enchained. If the privileged order were abolished, the nation would not be something less but something more. Thus, what is the third estate? Everything; but an everything shackled and oppressed. What would it be without the privileged order? Everything; but an everything free and flourishing. Nothing can progress without it; everything would proceed infinitely better without the others. It is not sufficient to have demonstrated that the privileged classes, far from being useful to the nation, can only enfeeble and injure it; it is necessary, moreover, to prove that the nobility does not belong to the social organization at all; that, indeed, it may be a burden upon the nation, but that it would not know how to constitute a part thereof.
The third estate, then, comprises everything appertaining to the nation; and whatever is not the third

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By June 17, 1789, the king of France, Louis XVI, was out of money and the entire country was paying the price. The Estates General had convened, which signaled the failure of King Louis XVI to effectively manage the finances and estate system of his country. At this Estates General meeting, many representatives of the Third Estate disliked the system of voting by estates and broke off to form the National Assembly. The National Assembly of France then drafted the guiding document for the French Revolution, The “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” on August 26, 1789. The ideals of natural rights and equality for men in this document came from the brilliant political philosophy of John Locke’s “The Second Treatise on Government.” This document was also influenced by Rousseau’s ideals of acting for the general will and popular sovereignty which he detailed in his book “The Social Contract.” “The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen” is the most crucial element for the formation of a new government system in France because it used the ideals from John Locke and Rousseau to ensure equality, popular sovereignty, and freedom, which had so often been denied…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobles help top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church. They were also exempt from paying taxes, though they resented the royal bureaucracy that employed middle-class men in positions that had once been reserved for them. Both rich and poor members of the Third Estate resented the privileges enjoyed by their social “betters.” Wealthy bourgeois families in the Third Estate could but political office and titles, but the best jobs were still reserved for nobles. Urban workers earned terrible wages.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    POLS Assignment 1

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Federalist paper 10 Madison argues that if an extended republic was set up including a multiplicity of economic, geographic, social, religious, and sectional interests, these interests, by checking each other, would prevent American society from being divided into the clashing armies of the rich and the poor. Thus, if no interstate proletariat could become organized on purely economic lines, the property of the rich would be safe even though the mass of the people held political power. His solution for the class struggle was not to set up an absolute and irresponsible state to regiment society from above; he was never willing to sacrifice liberty to gain security. He wished to multiply the deposits of political power in the state itself sufficiently to break down the sole dualism of rich and poor and thus to guarantee both liberty and security.…

    • 868 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second section continues in the midst of the American Revolution as the Pennsylvanian elite proved resistance to the ideas of distribution of wealth and…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The requests of representation belonged to the third estate, who received little to no say in their government. This negligence is visualised by the chaier, also notebook, of the poor estate with no dictation of money since divides upon poor men earnings are large and mostly minimal for higher estates (Doc 1). The poor people who…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro – The American Revolution spurred a dramatic shift in American Society which spawned numerous changes to the status quo, though in some cases this idealistic outpouring of principles was tempered with the harsh contradictions of colonial society. Though a change from the “virtual representation” and British tyranny, colonial federal government was weak and ineffective and prevented a true shift to an effective democratic society. Agrarian self-sufficiency was stressed, but only truly realized through protective tariffs. And while the ideological outpouring of the Declaration of Independence staring, “all men are created equal”, could have lead to a truly egalitarian society it so became clear that the statement applied (from 1775 – 1800) to rich, white, protestant, land owning adult males. Additionally visionary desires of peace with Native American tribes were never realized du tot the greed under, “The White Man’s Democracy”.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit #3 Review

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The US Constitution is one of the most influential documents in the history of modern governance. The system of government established by the writers of this document not only reflected and helped to ensure the hopes and desires of many citizens of the newly independent American state, but, perhaps more importantly, this system has served as a dramatic symbol for those people throughout the world who have struggled against tyranny and oppression ever since. This document has also served as a model for the creation of new governments over the past two hundred years. Nevertheless, some scholars, including Howard Zinn and Charles Beard, who wrote An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, contend that this document is not the democratic mantra that its supporters proclaim it to be. These critics argue that the Constitution was designed primarily to protect the economic interests of the aristocracy, not only from the tyranny of the government, but also from the political pressures of the lower classes. They point to the ideas of the separation of powers, federalism, and checks and balances as being primarily ways in which the elites of American society could insulate themselves from the will of the common people rather than efforts to protect against tyrannical government. These scholars also look to the writings of James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton in The Federalist Papers to support their contentions. Finally, they look to the actions of some of the founding fathers, like Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and even Jefferson to find support for this theory. During this unit, we will examine this evidence in order to assess the validity of this theory as compared to the more traditional views of most Americans. As always, finding the truth requires a delicate balance of inquisitiveness, interpretation, speculation, and appreciation for subtlety. There are seldom…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    29 French Revolution Copy

    • 871 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. The Estates General was like a super parliament made up of representatives from the First Estate, the ________, the Second Estate, the ________, and the Third Estate, ________ ________.…

    • 871 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. What is an oligarchy? Oligarchy according to the passage is referring to the group of “white men” who aren’t giving women the right to vote.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    stele hambari

    • 1423 Words
    • 10 Pages

    of state, the nobles, also the proprietors. The second class represents the common men or poor…

    • 1423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first argument that the author rises is about the inseparability of faction and liberty. He suggests that the government should not be concentrated on trying to prevent the causes of faction, but just control its effects.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Beard’s book, An Economic Interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, was published in 1913 and soon became one of the most controversial literary works of its time. Beard’s main thesis in this book is essentially that the Founding Fathers chose the specific format of the Constitution of the United States to protect their personal financial interests. Beard then goes on to argue that the Constitution was written by an “elite” attempting to safeguard their own assets and financial status. Beard was expanding on Carl L. Becker’s thesis of class conflict. In the eyes of Beard, the Constitution was created by the Founding Fathers as a “counter revolution” that ran against the wishes of farmers and laborers.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guatemalan Genocide

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Whenever the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people, and the protection of our properties, is applied to other ends, and made use of to impoverish, harass or subdue them to the arbitrary and irregular commands of those that have it; there it presently becomes tyranny, whether those that thus use it are one or many”…

    • 2516 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    inspiring

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The deceitful ways of the government, prompted congress to recommend that each colony should form a new government by the “authority of the people.” The restrictions would prevent free suffrage and initiate inequality for the people. I shall argue that equality didn’t exist among all Americans but for those who were free from slavery,who owned property and property being the basis of freedom.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all…

    • 3241 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays