Preview

What Is the Labelling Theory? Summarise and Evaluate Its Application to the Analysis of Crime and Criminal Justice.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is the Labelling Theory? Summarise and Evaluate Its Application to the Analysis of Crime and Criminal Justice.
Labelling theory refers to the ability to attach a label to a person or group of people and in so doing the label becomes more important than the individual. The label becomes the dominant form of identify and takes on ‘Master Status’ (Becker 1963; Lemert 1967) so that the person can no longer be seen other than through the lens of the label. Words, just like labels, are containers of meaning. In this case, the label and the meaning attached to it becomes all that the person is rather than a temporary feature of something that they have done or a way that they have behaved.

"Words [or labels], like little buckets, are assumed to pick up their loads of meaning in one person's mind, carry them across the intervening space, and dump them into the mind of another" (Osgood 1979:213)

Within criminal justice Labelling Theory has been seen as a way of manipulating and encouraging both the would be offender to think and behaviours in a particular way so as to live up to the label and equally to manipulate and direct the thoughts and actions of those that work and manage the system e.g. a label encourages them to takes on particular negative perspective or bias towards a person or group of people. This essay will focus on describing all aspects of Labelling Theory in relation to crime and the criminal justice system. It will also evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Labelling Theory which dominated sociological theory of crime and thinking in the 1960’ and 70’s.

Tannenbaum (1938); Lemert (1951) and Becker (1963) were amongst the first theorists to explore Labelling Theory as an aspect of criminality and the criminal justice system applicable to westernised societies. In particular, Tannerbaum (1938) has been attributed as the first labelling theorist and his main concept suggested that labelling is society’s way of ‘dramatising evil’. He claimed that “tagging, segregating, describing and emphasising aspects of an individual as deserving of special treatment”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labelling is defining or describing a person in terms of his or her behaviour or a particular aspect of that individual. Labels can be affirming and motivating. However, labels can be negative too, creating prejudice and separation between individuals or groups. For Howard Becker, a 1960’s sociologist, the meaning and the impact for an individual or a group, of having a label applied, must be considered. People with mental challenges are more likely to be discriminated and labels tend to stick.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labeling theory works on the basis that when dealing with crime, the behavior is not as important as the reaction to said behavior (the label). This implies that the way society reacts to the behavior will dictate whether or not it is deviant or better yet whether or not a person is "labeled" a criminal or deviant. The theory goes even further to say that if a behavior occurs and there is no reaction to the behavior then there is no deviance. This would contend that if a person was to commit murder and no one was to find out then he is not a murder. Of course in the latter example, he is a murder but he does not have the label affix to him as being a murder or even a criminal therefore, society does not perceive him as such. This theory holds that if a person commits a act and we consider that act to be deviant then the person committing that act is a deviant; Even further, by labeling them a deviant we have just now increased there chances for further deviance and as such watch them even closer for said further deviance. This is true however, if they committed a deviant act are they not deviant? If they killed somebody are they not murders? If they stole from somebody are they not thieves? And as such should we not pay closer attention to them to protect ourselves and our families from them. One indication that society agrees with this point, can be seen by the national sex offenders' registry and Megan's law which requires sex offender to register when they come into a new community. This registry is a shining example of the good and bad policy implications of this theory.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the world, lawbreakers are usually categorized according to their faults and that is their image in front of the world. Kimberly Brownlee, a PhD graduate in philosophy from the University of Oxford, author of Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience (2012) and a professor in Warwick University, claims that calling people with labels not only hides the difficulty of the situation but also stops them from remodeling their lives again. Labels like ‘criminal’ and ‘murderer’ are the reasons why people are rejected in society even after they have completed their term of punishment.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling Theory Analysis

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Labelling theory is a sociological theory which starts with an assumption that no act is inherently criminal and that criminality is relative and varies from one location to another as it is defined by those in power; whether through the formation of law or the interpretation of those rules by enforcement bodies such as police and the courts. Under this assumption, the deviant label is a product of society as it is not established through the act itself, but through the reaction of society to the act (Reeves, Albert, Kuper, & Hodges,…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling theory and its theorists focus on the groups and/or individuals who were deemed to be criminal and labelled thus by society. Labelling theorists studied the various interactions between the ‘criminal' groups and individuals and the conformist society. Labelling theory was quite popular in the 1960s and early 1970s, but then fell into decline—partly as a result of the mixed results of empirical research. This essay will go on to show the origins of labelling theory, the theory itself and will show its strengths and weaknesses using various case-studies and examples.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Deviance and Race

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Conley, the labeling theory is the belief that individuals subconsciously notice how others see or label them, and their reactions to those labels, over time, form the basis of their self-identity. In other words, labeling theory is the idea that society determines the distinction between what is deviant and what is not deviant. This theory states that conforming members of society, especially individuals with power, impose significant labels on certain behaviors, constructing them to be deviant.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stigmatization , conformity, Sanction and Obedience are four reasons to which the labeling theory has been used in society to discriminate, stereotype, influence , penalize , pose positive or negative actions, disobey and violates any norm or conduct that affiliates with deviance…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abstract: This study looks at the relation between recidivism and the labeling theory. The study examines what the ideas of the labeling theory are and how they relate to the modern justice system. Prison populations have skyrocketed since the beginning of the 1980s. This paper analyzes how this number has grown along with how labeling theory identifies how the community operates along with individuals.…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labelling Approach- This theory is based on how people from one culture who do the same things as another culture but only one of the groups may be considered deviant. (Schaefer, Richard, T. 2012, p.18). I see this actually see this often through courts and trials and media. I can most closely associate it with “Blacks” and “Whites”. We have seen crimes committed by Black people and they are considered thugs, one parent home problems and other negative connotations. However, when the same crime or even more heinous crime has been committed by its counterpart, we hear terms like troubled, mentally disturbed, etc. How can these crimes be viewed differently when often times they are the same crimes? American or at least the media is quick…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labeling Theory

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Conflict and radical theories ascribe several categories of crime and criminal laws to the self-interest of powerful segments of society. In common with labeling theory, the amount of objective evidence available to document these social process theories is limited and inconsistent. In the ideal and harmonious family, parents refrain from affixing labels to their children, either good or bad. It is understood that, taken to an extreme, such verbal reinforcers can easily become "self fulfilling prophecies." Supporters of labeling theory believe that a person with a deviant self-image will then suffer from reduced conventional opportunities. Over time, legal processing is felt to "steer" the individual farther and farther down the road to increased lawlessness. Future criminal offenses become statistically more likely, according to some. The risk of possible discrimination in the application of labels and legal sanctions is felt to be balanced/affirmed if the potential for continued criminality by the individual can be prophylactically curtailed. The label may reduce the overall number of victims.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Me personally I never got a negative label and I do not know anybody who was negatively labeled or drawn to a crime. Individuals turned into criminals when meaningful members of society classify them as such as well as they approve those classifications as a confidential identity. Whether better or worse, individuals are directed by the outcomes of others. Throughout their lives Individuals are assigned a variation of digital classifications in their interactions with others. These classification refer a number of actions as well as attitudes; classifications thus assist describe not just one trait but the entire person. If a belittled event is conferred by a definitive other, the disproving classification may enforce lasting damage to the objective. Being contemplated as a public deviant may lead their treatment at their house, at where they work, at where they attend school and in the different public circumstances. Classified persons may determine themselves becoming to others analogously discomfited for support as well as companionship. Stigmatization is a co-active approach, classifying theorists blame criminal justice agencies, initially created for its charge, for authentically assisting to adjure as well as augment criminal behavior. Felonies, such as murder, rape, as well as assault, are only terrible or…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The labelling theory was a hypothesis proposed and developed by sociologists including Howard Becker and Edwin Lemert in the 1960’s. Eventhough Howard Becker became to successor of this theory, is was Edwin Lemert who had proposed the main concepts of labelling. It wasn’t until around 10 years later in the 1970’s that this theory became more prominent and developed. It is a theory of how the determination of an individuals behaviour or self identity, can be influenced greatly by terms used to classify or describe them. This links strongly with the concept of ‘stereotyping’ and ‘stigmas’ .…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labeling Theory

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Labeling Theory begins with the idea that people will be at odds with one another because their values and beliefs differ. Certain people then gain power and translate their normative and value preferences into rules which govern institutional life which gives the position to place negative labels on those who do not follow their rules, calling them deviants. Howard S. Becker popularized this labeling perspective. He believed that deviance results from social judgments relative to group norms that are applied as labels to certain forms of behavior. Becker stated: “Social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance and by applying the rules to particular people and labeling them as outsiders”. He felt that studying the act of the individual was unimportant because deviance is simply rule breaking behavior that is labeled deviant by persons in positions of power.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Environmental Crimes

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Nelken applied labelling theory to corporate crime by looking at the works of the English family practitioner panels who investigate those accused of defrauding the NHS by over claiming. For example, a dentist admitted to fraud and the panel pleaded with him to retract his admission so it would not pass as a criminal prosecution. It applies also to corporate crime as negative labels are applied by powerful groups in society.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cssa Scheme

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the following part of review the perspective, I would like to discuss deviant behavior and the power relationship between those who creating or applying labels and those being labeled before the process of labeling and then the impact of it.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics