Preview

What Is Indiscriminate Sentencing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Indiscriminate Sentencing
1.) The rationale that the author presents for reducing the sentences of drug offenders is the racist delineation correlating to the 100:1 cracked cocaine violations. The author delineates the 100:1 punishments are divisive and racially fractured. Two additional data points delineated by Harvey Gee are housing costs correlated to offenders and faulty science.
2.) The average decrease of a sentence for an offender when the Fair Sentence Act of 2010 was applied retroactively was twenty-nine months.
3.) Indiscriminate sentencing is the arraignment of individuals in association to minimum punishments. Using Holder’s diction, it can be exemplified that indiscriminate punishment prevents itself from being penetrated by the individual conduct of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sirin writes that her article “investigates presidential progress in addressing racial injustices and disparities within the context of the war on drugs” and argues that the possibility for racial justice depends on a progressive president choosing its pursuit as a personal agenda. Sirin examines the drug policies of presidents from Richard Nixon to Barack Obama, and when discussing President Reagan, she gives him responsibility for the “punitive policies that disproportionately affected certain racial/ethnic groups” found in the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. She underscores his advocacy for federal mandatory minimum sentences, which created “the notorious 100 to 1 provision” under which five grams of crack cocaine carried the same prison sentence, five years, as 500 grams of powder cocaine. After explaining that crack cocaine users were typically poor and black, she notes that the resulting racial disparity in sentencing stayed in place until President Obama’s Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. Sirin clarifies that a progressive president will struggle without the legislature, judiciary, or public opinion, but she still holds that “most importantly, the president in office should have a progressive agenda to begin with in order to initiate and work towards key structural changes and policy reforms.” For this reason, according to her estimation, the president defines drug…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan Unit 3 Paper

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Determinate sentencing is when the mandatory minimum sentence is enhanced for certain crimes. Sentencing guidelines allow judges to consider the individual circumstances of the case when determining sentencing. Mandatory minimum sentences leave little or no room to the judge when setting a sentence. Determinate sentence statuses have existed at various times throughout the history of the United States. These became popular in the 1980s when public concern over crime increased dramatically and the public demanded laws to address the crime population.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of authoritative and reputable sources, such as the United States Census Bureau and United States Department of Corrections, strengthens her explanation and makes it more reliable. This appeal to reason convinces the audience because it uses rationale. She provides facts that tell how, “Drug convictions have increased more than 1000% since the drug war began, an increase that bears no relationship to patterns of drug use or sales” (Anderson 12), she emphasizes that since the “war” has been targeted at poor people of color, the increase has heavily affected those communities Alexander 13). The information Alexander provides impacts discourse and future action on the issue. There are many statistics she uses throughout the article that effectively demonstrate how mass incarceration is comparable to Jim Crow. One quarter of all black men are permanently disenfranchised, employment and housing discrimination is alive and legal, and denial of public benefits are just a few negative aspects that result from being a felon,( Alexander 21-22). By examining different effects of the “system”, Alexander provides solid and quality evidence for the bad effect of mass incarceration in this…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The House I Live In by Eugene Jarecki is a documentary film about the war on drugs in the United States. It raises many contemporary intercultural concerns about the issue, but first it would be important to explain what cultural groups it highlights. We would first think about diving the war on drugs between drug users and law enforcement, but after watching this movie we can tell that there is a real intercultural issue amongst drug users and prisoners incarcerated for drugs. Indeed, we learn in the movie and its website that “even though White and Black people use drugs at approximately equal rates, Black people are 10.1 times more likely to be sent to prison for drug offenses. Today, Black Americans represent 56% of those incarcerated for drug crimes, even though they comprise only 13% of the U.S. Population”.…

    • 2256 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this in effect it gave offenders to rehabilitate in prison. With good behavior in prison it could release them sooner rather than later (depending on the procedure’s of the parole board).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the PowerPoint, you talk about removing mandatory sentences, and for my understanding was if the crimes are committed before the mandatory sentences come in place this can be one of the expectations of not implement the mandatory sentence. The judge can have some discretion to adjust some guideline of sentencing and left the parole to decide if he can be released.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crck Gender Inequality

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States holds an incarceration rate of 2.3 Million people, and over half a million of those imprisoned are due to drug charges (Anon). And while African American only make up 11% of the population, they make up 40% of those imprisoned. The U.S also incarcerates higher rates of women than anywhere else in the world. (Reynolds). Thousands of the women incarcerated with children under the age of 18. Due to the feminization of poverty, many minority women are likely to commit drug offenses for economic purposes and to support their family. Laws as a response to the crack cocaine epidemic enacted minimum requirement sentencing laws, with little differentiating between low-level dealers, users, and kingpins. Thousands are still serving decade old sentences…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial disparity in sentencing continues to be a long time culmination in the criminal justice system. The disparity in criminal sentencing is seen when individuals who commit similar or the same criminal act results in acquiring different sentences upon conviction (Jones-Brown, 2002). The paper will take a look at racial disparity in sentencing today, do an examination of reasons for racial disparity in sentencing, and possible solutions to racial disparity in sentencing.…

    • 2143 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Kennedy Commission. (2003). Racial Disparities in the U.S. Criminal Justice System. Retrieved from www.drugpolicy.org…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate Sentencing

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An indeterminate sentencing is a term of incarceration in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. When the minimum term is reached, the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. A judge can prescribe a particular term, after which an administrative body known as the parole board decides at what point the offender is to be released. A prisoner is aware that he or she is eligible for parole as soon as the minimum time has been served and that good behavior can further shorten the sentence.In determinate sentencing, a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. If the legislature deems that the punishment for a first-time armed robber is ten years, then the judge has no choice but to impose a sentence of ten years and the criminal will serve ten years minus good time before being freed. In good times sentencing, a reduction in time served by prisoners based on good behavior, conformity to rules, and ther positive actions. In truth-in-sentencing laws, legislative attempts to assure that convicts will serve approximately the terms to whinch they were initially sentenced. The sentencing ritual strongly lends itself to the concept of individualized justice. Most judges consider two factors above all others: the seriousness of the crime and any mitigating or aggravating…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Federal Drug Abuse Act of 1986 created the guidelines for statutory mandatory minimum penalties currently effective in the federal drug trafficking crimes and also established a 100-to-1 drug quantities ratio between crack and powdered cocaine offenses for sentencing purposes. (Frank Schmalleger, 2007) This ratio was based on the assumption that crack cocaine is more dangerous than powdered cocaine, it is less expensive and may lead to violent crimes and addiction of youths and children. All drug addictions including prescription, present an enormous and difficult problem to contain. The difference in sentencing under the current law for possession of five grams of crack cocaine is a minimum mandatory sentence of five years in prison, possession of any quantity of other controlled substance by a first offender yields a maximum of one year in prison. I do not believe that this is justice.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Jim Crow

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today’s modern world, many people would be surprised to find out that there is still a racial caste system in America. After witnessing the election of a black president, people have started believing that America has entered a post-racial society. This is both a patently false and dangerous mindset. The segregation and stigma of race is still very much alive in our society. Instead of a formalized institution such as slavery or Jim Crow, America has found a new way to continue the marginalization of blacks by using the criminal justice system. In Michelle Alexander’s book “ The New Jim Crow”, she shows how America’s “ War on Drugs “ has become a tool of racial segregation and how the discretionary enforcement of drug laws has resulted in an overwhelmingly negative affect on its black population.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays