Preview

What Do Classic Studies of Social Influence Tell Us About Group Effects on Individual Behaviour?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1814 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Do Classic Studies of Social Influence Tell Us About Group Effects on Individual Behaviour?
What do classic studies of social influence (e.g., Asch, 1952; Milgram, 1974; Zimbardo, 1971) tell us about group effects on individual behaviour?

Social influence is the effect one person or a group has on the attitudes or behaviour of another. There are several different kinds of social influence. This essay the focuses on conformity - yielding publicly to group pressure, and sometimes yielding privately also (e.g. Asch (1951)); also on obedience – behaving as instructed, for example Milgram (1974). Studies of these kinds of social influence aim to show how much individuals will conform or obey authority, and suggest possible reasons for these effects.

Asch’s (1951) study aimed to investigate whether individuals would conform when the group is clearly wrong. The control group made less than 1% of errors. In experimental groups, 74% of participants conformed at least once. Participants said they knew others were wrong but did not want to look different. A few thought that the group must be right because they had a better view. This shows that group pressure is strong since most people conformed against their own judgement at some point. It also shows that there were individual differences, since 5% always conformed while 26% never did.

The majority of conformity studies tend to show the effect found in Asch’s study, i.e. quite a high percentage of people show conformity behaviour. There are several explanations of majority influence on individual behaviour. Informational influence: people feel the need to be right. When uncertain the group has informational power over an individual because it can provide information about what is correct. This effect is likely to lead to internalisation – the individual starts to believe what they conform to. This is supported by a greater level of conformity behaviour shown with greater uncertainty, difficulty of task and unanimity of majority. However it does not explain conformity in studies like Asch’s where the



References: Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97-119. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press. Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Gamson, W.A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with unjust authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973) Study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Research Review, 9, 1-17. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioural study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row. Bottom of Form

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One strength of this theory is that it has research to support it from Asch's 1951 study into conformity. The interviews that were taken after the experiment had finished, stated that there were two main reasons that the participants conformed. The first reason was that they didn't want to be ridiculed by the rest of the group from differing in opinions. They wanted to fit in so went along with the majority group, typical of normative social influence. The second reason was that they honestly thought that the rest of the group knew better than them and that their own judgements were incorrect, typical of informational social influence.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the article, “Opinions and Social Pressure” by Solomon E. Asch, he states that social pressure from a majority group could influence a person to conform. Asch and his research team wanted to find out how and how much social forces constrain people’s opinions and attitudes. The researchers also wanted to find out whether or not, when confronted with an incorrect answer, individuals would conform to the group or have his own answer.…

    • 714 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Conformity

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An important concept in the sociocultural level of analysis is conformity. Psychologist Baron (2008) defines conformity as a ‘type of social influence in which individuals change their attitudes or behavior to adhere to existing social norms’ (Baron). Social norms are the guiding principles pertaining to the appropriate behaviors, attitudes, and traditions that should be followed by individuals of the relevant society and or culture. Social norms are the concepts which cause an individual to conform often because of a desire to be accepted and liked by others - also known as the normative influence. To research conformity to a group norms, Sherif (1935) and Asch (1951) both conducted valuable…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conformity and Obedience

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform, also with explanations of minority influence. Whilst seeking to understand the reasons why people obey authority, it will show an evaluation of Milgram’s study of obedience, discussing the ethical issues raised from the research and assessing whether the knowledge gained about human behaviour justifies Milgram’s experiments.…

    • 3322 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Conforming” is when a person changes the way they act and think to fit in with the majority of people in a group to gain acceptance. Kelman (1958) said that there are 3 types of conformity, Compliance, which means going along with others to gain approval and avoid rejection and accepting the group view in public but not private. Identification is conforming to someone who is liked and respected and Internalisation is accepting the group’s beliefs and accepting it both publicly and privately. However this essay will be discussing the two main theories as to why people conform, Informational Social Influence and Normative Social Influence as well as other factors that can affect as to why people conform.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychological researchers have been interested in the degree to which people follow or rebel against social norms for a long time. Solomon Asch conducted a series of experiments designed to demonstrate the power of conformity in groups. According to some critics, some of the individual subjects may have been motivated to avoid conflict instead of a desire to conform to the rest of the group. Nevertheless, many social psychology experts believe that while real-world situations may not be as clear cut as they are in the lab, the actual social pressure to conform is probably much greater, which can dramatically increase conformist…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maxfield and Babbie in their book Basic of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology explain the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was to test the situational hypothesis of the prison environment itself. Maxfield and Babbie state, “…the prison environment creates dehumanizing conditions independent of the kinds of people who live and work in the institutions (Maxfield and Babbie, p. 43. 2009).” The experiment took on an exploratory design, which indicates the specific problem had not been clearly defined (Maxfield & Babbie, 2009). Zimbardo himself could only compare experiments of this nature to his high school friend, Milgram who conducted research on obedience to authority figures as related to the Holocaust. Exploratory research is begun to explore an issued regarding society to answer of the questions needed to conduct further studies. To this date the Stanford Prison Experiment has not be replicated exactly in any series of further on experiments related to the outcome of the original. The experiment was created by Curtis Haney, Craig Banks, and Philip Zimbardo (1973) in the basement of the Stanford University psychology department building where the “prison” was constructed. The “prison” consisted of cells, a “yard”, and a solitary confinement cell. An ad was placed in a newspaper and 75 volunteers answered the call but only twenty-one were chosen. The subjects with physical or psychological problems were vetted and those left were offered $15.00 a day to participate. The left over subjects were randomly assigned to be either guards or prisoners (Babbie & Maxfield, 2009).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch Conformity Essay

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Asch found that people conform for two main reasons. One reason is because people generally want to fit in with other groups (known as normative influence). The other reason is because people often believe that the group is better informed than they are (known as informational influence). As Asch explored and gave variety to his experiment, he found out that the bigger the group, the higher chance of people conforming to them. He also found that when people are uncertain about an answer, they tend to look to others for confirmation; the more difficult the task, the greater the conformity (McLeod, 2008).…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This investigation was set in order to study the rates of conformity when a group norm was presented to the subject and, more specifically to distinguish if the participant’s opinions would change when they were exposed to a majorities’ judgement. The experiment took place as a field experiment in which participants (20 college students) were selected from their own environment. The end results obtained from the experiment showed that conformity existed as the mean for those who were presented with the factitious sheet estimations were drastically higher (142.2) than that of those who received the blank sheet (mean of 86.6).…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group influences on behaviour may vary with individuals, particularly with decision-making skills. These changes may occur depending on the effects of two major phenomena’s, group polarization and group conformity. In simple terms, group polarisation occurs when the decisions and opinions of individuals change or become more extreme when they are in group settings. For example, when working in a group, individuals tend to build up a stronger opinion while working with others who feel strongly about the topic, which often results in a change in attitude to those individuals who felt differently about the topic. Group conformity occurs when the behaviour of an individual is changed as a result of group influence, conformity surrounds compliance and obedience. For example, when working in a group, if a majority of the group agree upon a topic, and an individual feels different about the topic, they tend to agree with the others opinion, changing their behaviour even though they still feel differently about the topic.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As social beings, with each one of us connected to a whole network of other humans and their associated beliefs, opinions and traits practically every conscious second of the day, it is inevitable that we will be subject to external influences. These influences come in all shapes and forms from a whole multitude of sources, occurring both consciously and unconsciously, instantaneously or over a prolonged period of time, with the potential effect of these influences ranging from the immaterial to the life-changing. While our susceptibility to influence from the connected world around us can be hard to measure given our constant exposure to several different influences, social psychologists have been able to study the world of influence within a group context with some success, led by the likes of Asch and Moscovici. The principal questions which have provided direction to these studies include why people conform in groups and whether some people more likely to conform than others. One will address these two questions in the text below, while also looking to explain what “minority influence” is, and how it differs to what is considered majority influence.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter on the research of obedience, studying the psychological actions and reactions, the implications brought forth are the surprising effects of simple commands and the subliminal influence. The articles “The Perils of Obedience”, by Stanley Milgram, and “Opinions and Social Pressure”, by Solomon E. Asch, both exhibit the traits of simple, ordinary test subjects following orders and actions by someone who is illustrated to have power or the general consensus but realistically do not.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Do People Conform?

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgement. In H. Guetzkow (ed.) Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure” by Solomon E. Asch, he claims that under group pressure, a subject 75% out of 123 participants agreed with the majority of the group. Asch demonstrated an experiment of 8 college student males for a psychological experiment on comparing the length of lines. He orchestrated everyone except 1 person to purposely answer the questions incorrectly, to see if that 1 person would continue independently with the correct answer or agree with the majority of the group. At the conclusion of Asch’s experiment, he was left wondering why do individuals conform to what their peers express instead of standing firm. Asch’s main idea of individuals converting their answers to a groups answers based on either the subjects believed…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays