Preview

What Did One Neandertal Say the Other Neadertal

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2384 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Did One Neandertal Say the Other Neadertal
|

The Speech Capabilities of late Archaic Homo Sapiens
Brandi Fowler
Ivy Tech Community College
December 4, 2012

Abstract
Although there is no direct evidence and a species language or their language capabilities do not fossilize, coupled with more modern techniques being used today and archeological evidence, it is possible now to study this topic with more success than in previous years. There is a record that supports the suggestion of Homo neandertal speech capabilities. Previous to the recovery of an intact middle paleolithic hyoid bone, the reconstructed vocal tract and the FOXP2 gene, the lack of evidence on the speech capabilities of Homo neandertals led most scholars to regard the topic as unsuitable for serious study (2012) .

H. neandertal speech capabilities have proven in recent years to be a task capturing much of the time and research of anthropologist. In the 20th century it was commonly thought that H. neandertal was too brutish and simple to have evolved into modern humans, and had very little modern behavior or capabilities. As the fossil record grew and the technology progressed the scientific community found evidence of modern behavior and possibly speech capabilities, that would portray H. neandertal as the advance subspecies he was instead of the brutish, unintelligent being that had been reinforced through the 20th century.
Empirical evidence that supports speech capabilities among H. neandertal could mean origins of modern language, larger cultural leaps than once thought and a variety of social relationships among these archaic Homo Sapiens . It is generally agreed that origins of language are closely tied to the origins of modern human behavior, although there is little agreement on the implications. The discovery of the hyoid bone, reconstructions of the vocal tract including the cranial base and the larynx, the DNA sequence of H. neandertal that carried the FOXP2 gene (fork head box protein) and is known as the



References: Ash, P & Robinson, D. September 20, 2011. THE EMERGENCE OF HUMANS: AN EXPLORATION OF THE EVOLUTIONARY TIME LINE. Calloway, E. April 5, 2008. Neandertals speak out after 30,000 years. New Scientist. Retrieved From http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13672-neandertals-speak-out-after-30000-years.html Hitchcock, Don. May 21, 2011. Kebara Cave. A middle paleolithic Aurignacian and Mousterian Site Kamrani, K. October 18, 2007. Neandertals have the same mutations in FOXP2, the language gene, as modern humans Mahathey, S. December, 2000. Neandertal speech capability and the limitations of osteological Analysis Phillips, D. 2000. Neanderthals Are Still Human! Acts & Facts. 29 (5). Retrieved from http://creation.com/neandertal-speech-capability-and-the-limitations-of-osteological-analaysis Than, K. (June 14, 2012) World 's Oldest Cave Art Found—Made by Neanderthals?. National Geographic Thompson, R. (March 29, 2000) The Brain: A neuroscience primer. Macmillan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lb1 Research Paper

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2004 a group of scientists found the partial skeleton of a new human species we had never seen before. Researchers called the remains LB1, also nicknamed the hobbit due to its small size. It was first believed that this new species, Homo floresiensis, was a descendent of Homo erectus that had simply dwarfed over time due to limited access to resources. However, newer studies have highlighted some of the more primitive characteristics of LB1, which lead scientists to believe that the hobbits branched off from the human family tree much earlier than previously thought.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Found ways to use vocal cords to communicate 150,000 years ago, let them report more complex messages…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time Frame: Neanderthals diverged over 550,000 to 690,000 years ago. Other data estimates they lived between 365,000 and 853,000 years ago and 465,000 before present. Human trunk and limb bones of Homo antecessor, recovered from the Gran Dolina site in Spain have been dated at about 780,000 years old and are said to represent the last common ancestor for modern humans and Neanderthals. Phylogenetic analysis of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA leads to a date for the common ancestor of the Neanderthal and modern humans at around 465,000 to 600,000 years ago. Archaeologists have found much physical evidence to confirm this date, such as the 0.73 Mya old fossils with stone tools and animal bones. The other date matches the movement of modern humans out of Africa and the appearance of modern traits in fossil skulls. Fossil skull traits such as high rounded skulls and small brow ridges, a vertical forehead and a pronounced chin first appear in Africa about 130,000 years ago. They then appear outside of Africa over 90,000 years ago.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods in Evolutionary Anthro & Archaeology Early Hominins Homo erectus and Homo floresiensis Reading week - no class…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of the status of Neanderthal man has been hotly contested in the anthropology world. It is the matter of whether Homo Sapiens are the decedents of Neanderthals or whether they are cousins with a common ancestor. If Neanderthals are considered to be a proper descendent to Homo Sapiens, then they can be rightfully classified as Homo Sapiens Neanderthal. If they are truly a separate species, then they should be classified as Homo Neanderthal.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Experts feel certain that hunter-gatherers were speaking with each other in some kind of language” (Brown, 2012). This development of language occurred due to the fact that the hunter-gatherers had to develop some sort of speech in order the effectively communicate. In these small sites which they lived, everyone had to do their fair share in order to accommodate the needs of their growing groups. This did not just mean in regards to the actual acts of hunting and gathering. This has to do with their lifestyle and all aspects of it.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contribution TMA06

    • 1151 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethology studies and case studies have been performed on our primates to compare human language with animal communication and to teach apes human language. The results suggested that animal communication, although similar to some degrees to human language, yet is qualitatively different. In investigating the evolution of language, this paper will evaluate whether or not human language can account for human distinctiveness from other animals. In doing so, this paper will evaluate the evolutionary process of human language based on two different accounts: one presented by Pinker (2000), who argued that language promoted a distinctive adaptive advantage, and the other suggested by Sperber (2000), who argued that language arose as a by product of cognitive abilities.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human are classified in the primate order. The primate order contains countless species of prosimians, monkeys, apes, and us. Moreover even though humans are classified along with other primates the nearest relative is chimpanzees. Similarly, humans and chimpanzees share, “anatomy, and genetic material” that has been noted for several years now. By sharing similar traits it is noted as a vital part of human evolution. Human evolution is the development of humans also known as Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens are categorized in the Hominidae family, a family that has shown to ensure increased brain size with complexity and bipedalism. Chimpanzees have undergone many different changes during that resulted in binocular vision, mobile digits without claws but nails, decreasing in sense of smell due to a reduced snout, large and complex brains. Specific traits are illustrated distinctively within humans (Kottak, 2009).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the emergence of physically/anatomically ‘modern’ humans in Europe, the Neanderthal population that frequented the Eurasian continent for the past 1.4-2 Million years drastically began to decline. The exact period when the population was wiped out is debated, while some argue around 40 Kya, recent findings suggest they may have remained alive in pockets up to 24 Kya. Another aspect of Neanderthals that is widely contested is what exactly killed them off; the most prominent arguments include competition with these encroaching Homo Sapiens, interbreeding/hybridisation, the inability to adapt to climate change, and parasites/pathogens are mentioned. There isn’t substantial evidence for any of these claims to stand on their own, Whether…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The greatest achievement and jump in evolutions was mans bipedality, suddenly we were faster, taller, able to bring and eat food for efficiently, it was a marvel. We were mobile, energy efficient, we could migrate and avoid the incredibly harsh weather, it also allowed for bigger brains, which improved out intelligence. Tools were also a great help to Neanderthal men, it made life easier and able to compete with the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So an important thing to distinguish when examining ability of non-human primates with communication or language is the actual defined difference between language and communication, and exactly where the definite line of distinction might be separating the two, if there even is a line to be considered when looking at so many different animals. Non-human primates have been studied and observed for both communication and language capabilities and distinction is often necessary to understand what has been discovered and what can be discovered. Many researchers of non-human primates argue that they cannot and do not have the capability of language, while others believe that non-human primates do have language, or can be taught forms of language by humans. Some researchers, that believe that non-human primates do have language or can be taught language, realize that it may not be the same level of complexity as that of human language as a whole but that it is a simple but true language form nonetheless. The reality is the definition of language and communication are what truly can determine if research can show non-human primates having language and or the ability of learning human language when trained, so each research can have potentially a different…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The development of language isn’t due solely to a larger brain, but also to genes and the physiological anatomy of humans.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Evolution Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A group of scientists lead by Biren Patel have recently found a partial mandible of an ancient primate related to lemurs. Scientists have named the new species Ramadapis sahnii and claim that it existed 11 to 14 million years ago, and is a member of the early primate family Sivaladapidae. Analysis of the jawbone shows that the species consumed leaves and was approximately the same size as a house cat, or to a modern day lemur. This discovery is important to the scientific community as with this discovery more information surrounding the evolutionary history of primates can be gathered and analysed. This new species will also help expand the phylogenetic tree for primates, making it significant to any scientist researching primate evolution.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (1) For years, scientists have attempted to teach animals to communicate, but for the most part, their efforts have failed. (2) In the 1950s, psychologists failed to teach a chimpanzee to speak, for the ape was able to grunt only a few words. (3) In the 1960s, however, a chimp named Washoe learned the sign language of the deaf. (4) Washoe came to understand hundreds of words, and he used them to communicate and express original ideas. (5) As it turns out, the great apes have the capacity to learn language, but they cannot speak. (6) This research proved that humans are not the only animals capable of using language; however, they are the most sophisticated users of…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays