What Are the Reasons Behind Challenging Behaviour in Residential Care Situations?: a Study of the Opinions of Young People and Staff.
What are the Reasons Behind Challenging Behaviour in residential care situations?: a study of the opinions of young people and staff.
Residential Care is local authority and privately owned residences within which Looked After Children (LACs) aged thirteen to eighteen reside.
Challenging behaviour is a term defined as two main types: disruptive or externalised behaviours which may include some of the following: aggressive behaviour such as fighting, disobedience, tantrums, destruction of property, bullying and attention-seeking; non-disrupting or internalised behaviours including depression and anxiety. Symptoms of the latter include tension, inferiority complexes, unhappiness, feelings of worthlessness, timidity, social isolation and hypersensitivity (Hayden et al. 1999).
Within my research I will be focusing upon externalised behaviours, specifically tantrums which are defined as episodes of extreme anger and frustration characterised by crying, screaming, shouting and violent body motions, including throwing things (Encyclopaedia of Children’s Health [online] 2011).
My interest in this area stems from placement experience when two young men I worked with were reading an article 'Breaking the law - in and inside ' in Who Cares Magazine (2010), a publication they receive every month. Within the publication was a letter from a young man of a similar age to them (15-16) and he said he behaved badly because people expected him to and he felt that if people expected him to he might as well live up to this reputation. The young men I worked with agreed with this, which made me think about the reasons behind some of the behaviour they exhibit on a regular basis.
Within my placement in residential care the most common form of challenging behaviour I witnessed was tantrums. I feel it is important both for the young person and staff to understand the reasons behind the behaviour; for the young person they will better understand themselves and for staff they
Residential Care is local authority and privately owned residences within which Looked After Children (LACs) aged thirteen to eighteen reside.
Challenging behaviour is a term defined as two main types: disruptive or externalised behaviours which may include some of the following: aggressive behaviour such as fighting, disobedience, tantrums, destruction of property, bullying and attention-seeking; non-disrupting or internalised behaviours including depression and anxiety. Symptoms of the latter include tension, inferiority complexes, unhappiness, feelings of worthlessness, timidity, social isolation and hypersensitivity (Hayden et al. 1999).
Within my research I will be focusing upon externalised behaviours, specifically tantrums which are defined as episodes of extreme anger and frustration characterised by crying, screaming, shouting and violent body motions, including throwing things (Encyclopaedia of Children’s Health [online] 2011).
My interest in this area stems from placement experience when two young men I worked with were reading an article 'Breaking the law - in and inside ' in Who Cares Magazine (2010), a publication they receive every month. Within the publication was a letter from a young man of a similar age to them (15-16) and he said he behaved badly because people expected him to and he felt that if people expected him to he might as well live up to this reputation. The young men I worked with agreed with this, which made me think about the reasons behind some of the behaviour they exhibit on a regular basis.
Within my placement in residential care the most common form of challenging behaviour I witnessed was tantrums. I feel it is important both for the young person and staff to understand the reasons behind the behaviour; for the young person they will better understand themselves and for staff they
References: Anon (2011) Tantrums [online] Available at:<http:// www.healthofchildren.com /T/Tantrums.html >[Accessed 14th April 2011]. Andenæs, A. (1995) ‘Theories of development from the perspective of the children, their parents and the scientists’ European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 3:2 pp.175-194. Baldry, S. and Kemmis, J. (1998) ‘Research Note: What is it Like to be Looked After by a Local Authority?’ British Journal of Social Work. 28:1 pp.129-136. Biehal, N., Claydon, J., Stein, M. and Wade, J. (1995) Moving On : young people and leaving care schemes. London: HMSO. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. California: Sage. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. Coward, R. (1997) ‘Our Children’s Absolute Right to be Bone Idle’ The Guardian 9th June. Clausen, S.E. and Kristofersen, L.B. (2008) Children in Child Protection Services in Norway 1990-2005: a longitudinal study (in Norwegian). Oslo: NOVA. Creswell, J.W. (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.)London: Sage. Davies, B Department of Health (1998) Someone Else’s Children. London: HMSO. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On Writing Qualitative Research: Living by words. London: Routledge/Falmer. Fletcher, B. (1993) Not Just a Name. London: Who Cares Trust. Garrett, P.M. (1999) ‘Producing the Moral Citizen: the ‘LACs’ system and the regulation of children and young people in public care.’ Critical Social Policy. 19:3 pp. 291-311. Hare, A. D. and Bullock, R. (2006) ‘Dispelling misconceptions about LACs’ Adoption and Fostering 30:4 pp.26-35. Haavind, H. (2001) Contesting and recognizing historical changes and selves in development methodological challenges. [online] Avalaible at: < http://childhood.isr . umich.edu/mmconf/haavind.pdf> [Accessed 13th April 2010]. Hayden, C. (2010) ‘Offending Behaviour in Care: is children’s residential care a ‘criminogenic’ environment?’ Child and Family Social Work 15:4 pp. 461-472. Hayden, C., Goddard, J., Gorin, S. and Van Der Spek, N. (1999) State Child Care Looking after Children? London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Hayden, C. and Gough, D. (2010) Implementing a Restorative Justice Approach in Children’s Residential Care. Bristol: Policy Press. Hochschild, A. R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialism of Human Feeling. Calafornia: University of California Press. Jakobsen,T.B Jansen, A. (2010) ‘Victim or Trouble Maker? Young people in residential care’. Journal of Youth Studies,13:4 pp.423-437. John (2010) ‘Own Two Feet: Up in the air’ John’s Blog [online] Available at: <http:// owntwofeet.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/up-in-the-air/#comments>[Acessed 10th April 2011]. Kufeldt, K., Simard, M. and Vachon, J. (2003) ‘Improving Outcomes for Children in Care: Giving youth a voice’ Adoption and Fostering 27:2 pp.8-19. Marrow, V. and Richards, M. (1996) ‘The ethics of social research with children: an overview’ Children and Society. 10:2 pp.90-105. McCarthy, G., Janeway, J. and Geddes, A. (2003) ‘The Impact of Emotional and Behavioural Problems on The Lives of Children Growing Up in the Care System’ Adoption and Fostering. 27:3 pp.14-19. McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy. London: Sage. Minty, B. (1999) ‘Annotation: Outcomes in Long-Term Foster Family Care’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 40:7 pp. 991-999. Munro, E., Skuse, T. and Ward, H. (2005) ‘The best of times, the worst of times young people’s views of care and accommodation’ Adoption and Fostering. 29:1 pp. 8-17. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). California: Sage. Pope, C. and Mays, N, (1995) ‘Reaching the Parts Other Methods Cannot Reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research.’ British Medical Journal. 311: 6996 pp. 42-45. Ridge, T. and Millar, J. (2000) ‘Excluding Children: Autonomy, Friendship and the Experience of the Care System’ Social Policy and Administration. 34:2 pp. 75-160. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. California: Sage Rowe, J., Cain, H., Hundley, M Roy, P., Rutter, M. and Pickles, A. (2000) ‘Institutional Care: risk from family background or pattern of rearing?’ Journal of Child Psycology and Psychiatry. 41:2 pp. 139-150. Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The art of hearing data. California: Sage. Rutter, M. (2000) ‘Children in Substitute Care: Some Conceptual Considerations and Research Implications’ Children and Youth Services Review. 22:9-10 pp.685 – 703. Smith, C. (1997) ‘Children’s Right: Have carers abandoned values?’ Children and Society 11:1 pp.3-15. Vinnerljung, B., Hjern, A. and Lindbald, F. (2006) ‘Suicide Attempts and Severe Psychiatric Morbidity Among Former Child Welfare Clients: a national cohort study.’ Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47:7, pp.723-733. Who Cares Magazine (2010) ‘Breaking the Law - in and inside’ Who Cares Magazine 93: Winter (Unknown page number).