Preview

Weekly Assignment 1

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Weekly Assignment 1
Philosophy 3A
Linda Chitamu
16 April 2013
A.S. Coates
Weekly Assignment 1

In Moore’s proof if an external world, he is attempting to show that we can know things outside of our own us (Moore; 144). He proves this by using the example of showing his hands, pointing at one hand and saying “here is my right hand” then pointing to the other and saying the same thing (Moore; 144). He states that by just being able lift hand is proof that it exists. He provided three conditions that support his claim which are that; if his two conclusions differ from one another, which they do not. If he knew proof but did not believe it and vice versa; and finally if his conclusion did not follow the premises which it did (Moore ; 145).
Moore addresses the issues that readers have about the fact that he is not answering the question. He claims that they are seeking a statement saying, “Here’s one hand and here’s the other”, to prove external existence by coming up and examining both hands (Moore; 146). This statement is meant to accommodate all the examples of proof of external objects (Moore, 147). It is very unlikely that on exists because for that statement to be true there would have to be an initial proof that a person is not dreaming which is quite difficult to do.
Moore also provides an additional proof for objects that have previously existed by saying:” I held up two hands above the desk not very long ago, therefore two hands existed not very long ago and therefore at least two external objects have existed at some time in the past” (Moore; 146).He uses this as a solution to Immanuel Kant’s (1724–1804) problem of the existence of external objects; because it shows that the objects have existed at some point in time (Moore;146).

[300 Words]

Reference List
G.E. Moore’s paper “Proof of an External World” Taken from Sosa, E. and J.Kim.2000.Epistemology: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Week 10 Assignment 4

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Solving the problem by using Solver of M S Excel, the answer report is given below:…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 2 Assignment

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before agreeing to the contract I would like to outline some risks that goes with this current project. I will address the concerns by showing you the qualitative and the quantitative risks…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3 assignment

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From the perspective of six pillars of character, if I were Cindie, I would be honest with Lyndell and tell him what’s been bothering me. Hopefully, by keeping quiet about him leaving early, he will feel that I’m trustworthy enough to tell me his problems, whether it’s drinking or any other problems he is facing in his life. I might be able to help him or at least come up with some ideas to help him. I will also respect him more if he can open up to me and is willing to fix his problems. If he continues to leave early, I would have no choice but to report this situation to the store manager because I would feel responsible if something bad happens to the store while I was on duty alone. Apparently, Lyndell is not a responsible person because he leaves work early and makes Cindie do part of his job. Cindie is responsible because even though it got really busy when 10 Japanese customers came in at the same time one night, she rushed through and was able to satisfy the customers’ needs. It is not fair to Cindie that she has to close up by herself and often work the late shift just because she is the “new kid on the block” (Mintz & Morris, 2011). Everybody should be treated equally (Mintz & Morris, 2011).…

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 2 Assignment 2

    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page

    Which input/output devices will you be using in the next one to three years as…

    • 289 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | |Write a 350- to 700-word response describing the use of argument and logic in the excerpt that| | |…

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy." AND "If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable—what then?"…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a human organism located exactly where you are located. Eric Olson argues that you are identical to that organism. This view is known as animalism. His “thinking animal” argument takes the following form: (1) There is a human animal where you are located; (2) If there’s a human animal where you are located, it is thinking; (3) The only thing thinking where you are located is you; and (4) So, you are a human animal. One argument, which exhibits parallel reasoning and boasts premises motivated in the exact same way, may be employed to resist Olson’s argument. In this paper I will show that this argument, which I will now call the Guanilo-Style argument, is structurally identical to Olson’s argument, but which yields a conclusion that is implausible. This will render Olson’s argument unsound, as any objections raised to the Guanilo-Style argument must also be raised to Olson’s argument.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thanks to Saint Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury1, the ontological argument was born in the early 1100’s. The ontological point of view, according to St. Anselm, describes God as “a being than which no greater can be conceived”.2 St. Anselm concluded that if such being failed to exist, another even greater being could be conceived that does exist. This argument would be illogical, as no being can be greater than the greatest being. Therefore God must exist. As you can see, St. Anselm’s ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of a greater being but his argument contains two flaws within it. The first can be seen in his definition - or lack thereof - in the idea of conceiving. The second flaw lies in what sorts of inferences Anselm asks of his reader. Later in this essay I will defend my view against the charge that St. Anselm’s argument is a priori argument and not a posteriori.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moore’s argument for the proof of the existence of the external world is as follows: (P1) here is one hand, (2) here is another hand, (C1) there now exists two hands, (C2) therefore, external objects exist (Citation needed). Moore states that this argument of his isn’t just a proof of an external world, but a rigorous proof. Now, for an argument to be categorized as a rigorous proof, Moore states that it has to satisfy the three following criteria: (1) the premise has to be different from the conclusion, (2) if the premise is true, then the conclusion must be true as well, (3) one has to know the premise to be true (Citation needed). When one examines Moore’s argument, it is vividly clear the premises are different from the conclusions, given that in his premises, he refers to hands specifically by stating “here is one hand”, “here is another hand”, whereas in the conclusions he merely states that “two hands exist at this moment” (Citation needed).…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay “Proof of an External World”, Moore begins by saying that there are many perfectly rigorous proof and arguments for the existence of an external world. The example he gives is suppose he holds up his left hand and says, “here is a hand”; then he holds up his other hand and says, “here is another hand.” Moore argues that this is a rigorous proof of the conclusion there now exists two hands at this point in time. For any proof to be considered rigorous, you just need the following three things: (1) the premises must be known, (2) the conclusion must be different than the premises, and (3) the conclusion must follow from the premises (i.e. if the premises are true, so must the conclusion). Moore claims that his hand proof is rigorous, and he thinks it should be obvious that many more proofs like this can be given. However, his proof that the external world exists relies on the assumption that we know that “here is a hand”. The fact that the premise itself is not rigorously proved is much cause for skepticism; yet, Moore tries to show that the skepticism is unwarranted. We cannot necessarily prove that we can know the world exists, but we still can in fact prove that it exists by a similar procedure to Moore’s hand argument. While I feel that Moore is correct, looking at his position from a skeptic’s standpoint is hardly convincing. His argument does not seem to have an effect on the skeptical position except appealing to common sense. He simply says that we can know without being able to prove that a certain knowledge of something (i.e. the hands existing) is…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    to two. The first was a problem M made us think about, the problem of other minds: What justifies our belief that other minds…

    • 159399 Words
    • 638 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can anyone actually prove the existence of an external world? Through senses? The mind? Or should it be simple taken on faith? In Descartes’ Second Meditation, the philosopher challenges the basis of all knowledge and questions how senses can deceive one’s abilities to perceive the outside world. Moreover, the author asserts that it even difficult to prove whether one is living in reality or a dream. While Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason demanded proof (and called anything less than proof a “scandal”), his theory was based on the mind’s interpretation of what the senses experience, and humans experience only the interpretations of objects, not the reality. In “Proof of an External World,” G.E. Moore counters that Kant was unable to…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dualism Theory

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Epistemological dualism is another type which explains the subject. This can be explained by the fact that there is the real thing and a representation of the same. An example is given of the fact that we live in a consciously experienced world rather than the real one which is internally represented. Lastly, we have the predicate dualism which supports the use of several propositions to bring sense into an issue. This type of dualism also argues the impossibility of making the psychological believes to be expressed in the physical nature or in the natural language (Robinson,…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Giver Analysis

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evidence 1: “Things could be different. I don’t know how, but there must be some way for things to be different. There could be colors.” (128)…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the other can only exist for us in two forms: if I experience him with evidence, I fail to know him [and hence myself]; if I know him, if I act upon him, I only reach his being-as-object and his probable existence in the midst of the world.…

    • 2292 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays