Preview

Watergate: Impeachment In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Watergate: Impeachment In The United States
The Presidential power to pardon people for the crime they have been convicted off is something that is used by the President to gain political support and leverage. It has normally been used by the President to help their friends and political allies. In many cases, the President goes pardon crazy on his last day in office; pardoning people left and right for future political support. This power is granted to the President under Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution. It states that the President “shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” However, the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this to include all the powers of clemency, giving the President …show more content…
This scandal was about how Richard Nixon sent people into the Democratic National Committee headquarters, at the Watergate office complex, so he could information that would possibly help him for the upcoming election(which he didn’t really need because he won by a landslide). Perhaps the most controversial of all the pardons, President Gerald Ford pardoned his predecessor Richard Nixon in attempt to quell the spirit of disharmony and distrust that was growing rapidly in the United States of America because of this scandal that became known as Watergate. Many people believe that this incident was a vile miscarriage of justice that should never have happened and that this is just another glaring example of the Republicans trying to subvert American democracy. However, Ford’s reason for pardoning Nixon was not of “the ultimate fate of Richard Nixon”, but his “concern is the immediate future of this great country.”(Ford, …show more content…
He could use it to gain political support or in Bill Clinton’s case, money for campaigns and funds. I think this power in some cases help the county; Ford’s pardon helped eased the pain the country was feeling because of the shocking cover up. However, it does stir up emotions from the American public and can turn into nasty propaganda and slander in the news. I feel this power should be limited to a certain extent. The President should be given a limit on how many pardons per term it could use; 40 pardons for the four years in office he has is what I think should be the maximum amount should be. I feel that if we limit the number of pardons the President can use, then he would use them a lot more wisely. The President always cares about the well being of the country before his own needs to a certain extent, so I feel that he will in fact use them more wisely if the number of pardons were limited. I think that it should be that the President only pardons people for the benefit of the people, like in Nixon’s case. Nixon’s pardon was critical for America moving forward, because without it there would have been a major trial which would create a feeling of chaos. Many people would feel unsafe at the thought that the President could and would commit a crime. Forgiveness heals any problem, and in Nixon’s case, forgiveness was needed and given. The Presidential pardon power has the ability to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exceptions~ No pardons were issued to high ranking Confederates and people who owned $20,000+ of property.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that nixon should have been pardoned by Ford. The first reason I believe that he should be pardoned is because the country already had many problems. One of the problems with the country was racism which needed to be at an end or at least addressed. Another problem was the recovering of the states after vietnam and economic issues. The second reason I believe in his pardoning is Nixon already had paid a price for the crime. Many people liked him in office and he had support and he had to give it all up so it was enough punishment. The third reason I believe Ford did the right thing is because he was acting as a leader and he said that the country needed to be more merciful. I think that maybe him acting…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. His Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, which included full pardons for rebels willing to renounce secession and accept the abolition of slavery, angered abolitionists, who thought that the president was making a mockery of African Americans' freedom.…

    • 2725 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even while the Civil War was in progress, the “Union”, the federal government offered amnesty to confederate citizens in an attempt to encourage loyalty to the Union and to begin the process of reconstruction. The Confiscation Act of 1862 authorized the president of the United States to pardon anyone involved in the rebellion. The Amnesty Proclamation of December 8, 1863, offered pardons to those who had not held a Confederate civil office, had not mistreated Union prisoners, and would sign an oath of allegiance.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - In 1863, President Lincoln used his power of presidential pardon when he issued the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction to bring about immediate restoration of the Union. He used the 10% plan. After the war the American peopled needed unification. After Lincolns death, Johnson dad to evaluate the status of the states that had succeeded. By presidential proclamation he appointed a governor for each of the former Confederate states and freely restored political rights to large numbers of Southern citizens through use of presidential pardons. To deal with one of its major concerns -- the condition of former slaves -- Congress, in March 1865, established the Freedmen's Bureau to act as guardian over African Americans and guide them toward self-support. And in December of that year, Congress ratified the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which abolished slavery. both 10 % had to be eligible to vote for 1860 election, cant hold any type of office for confederate…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln was assassinated and Andrew Johnson took presidency. He favored harsh punishment for traitors. He issued two proclamations without help of Republicans. This was the Presidential Reconstruction. When he issued the two proclamations it caused a division. It covered official pardon for whites except Confederate officials and military officers worth more than twenty thousand dollars, and he names a provisional government for North Carolina. Only…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “God cannot pardon me if I have done wrong,” is what John Wilkes Booth said in his diary after he shot president Abraham Lincoln. John Wilkes Booth was an actor during the Civil War supporting the Confederates. When Abraham Lincoln was elected president, Booth didn’t agree with what he did. Booth decided to kill Lincoln, but he wasn’t insane. There were reasons for Booth’s actions.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln: the Movie

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The film Lincoln is relatively accurate. No film is bound to be completely and utterly factual. One fact the filmmakers did get correct was Lincoln did indeed pardon a lot of people after they attempted to dissert. Another correct detail was the issue of the peace talks with the South. Some of the representatives wished to delay the vote on the amendment until after Lincoln had discussed peace with the negotiators. However, this could have impeded the passage of the amendment. So, Lincoln wrote a note saying, “So far as I know, there are…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Presidential Pardon is important for someone who has committed a crime because the president has the unique ability to override the justice system, release anyone he chooses from paying a fine, and return a person to the state of innocence he had before he ever committed a crime. The power to pardon is left solely to the discretion of the president, and cannot be reviewed or overturned by any of the other branches of government. The President gets to "forgive" people from their crimes, or let them escape the rest of their criminal sentences. In other words, the president can let criminals out of jail and release criminals from their judicial sentences. In the United States, the President has the ability to pardon people only for federal…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford desired to end of Nixon’s suffering, whom he believed, “will continue to suffer, no matter what I do.” (Ford Nixon Pardon) In a news conference Ford stated he, “…hoped that our former president who had brought peace to millions would find it for himself.” (Presidents News Conference, 1974) This paper critiques President Ford’s speech entitled “Remarks on Pardoning Richard Nixon.” Though it has been colored with bias from the media, this critique will help individuals who want to see the story outside of the flashy news headlines. It offers an eye opening view of Ford’s motives for the pardon and a brief look into why he deserves more credit for this act of courage. This paper will discuss the background of events which led to Ford’s pardon, examine his speech, give a Neo-Aristotlelian analysis of the speech, and finally conclude with statements meant to give a distinctive perspective on Fords integrity, trustworthiness, and decision making…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the past, the power of executive privilege has been used by Presidents to conceal information that has to do with foreign affairs and negotiations, military, national security issues as well as deliberations and policy making that is done between the President and his top aides. This power is only used when Congress asks the President or one of his top aides to produce all of the information pertaining to an event or situation. If the President then feels that parts of this information needs to be kept secret to protect the best interest of the public, or the other issues listed previously, then he will use executive privilege in order to not give that information to Congress. A huge part of executive privilege is to protect the deliberations and advice given by the President’s aides. When the President’s advisors give him advice, they need to be able to give him the best advice possible and if there is a chance that everything they said could be made public. For instance if the President and advisors are discussing what needs to be done in relation to a foreign power and one suggests to nuke them, one suggests a covert attack and one suggests a peaceful resolution. If the final decision is a peaceful resolution, and Congress asks for all of the information on the subject, then the President should use executive privilege to keep those other possible outcomes from going public, both to keep the public from getting out of control or uneasy and to keep the other country from finding out the other options and retaliating. This power ensures that the President’s advisors can be completely honest and say what needs to be said without being worried about their words being taken the wrong way or too harsh or hurt their image.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has had to rule on issues regarding Presidential immunity in a few cases. Three specifically have helped to set the precedent for how the court would interpret another case brought before the court. In Mississippi v. Johnson the ruling decided whether a president can have an injunction placed on him/her based on the carrying out of their executive duties. Next, in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the court ruled on whether a president can be personally sued for decisions they made while in office that violated established law. Lastly, in the case of Jones v. Clinton it was decided if a president could be granted immunity from a civil suit not in relation to his/her office, simply because of the importance of the presidency and the time necessary to dedicate to the job. These three cases involving Presidential immunity have shaped the way a court would interpret a case involving such if faced today.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Powers of the President

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First of all, the President’s powers as noted in the book “The Struggle for Democracy” by Edward Greenberg and in the videos given, it is pretty much agreed that the power of the President has grown considerably. The President has many roles from being a worldwide representative of the U.S. citizens to the world to the Chief Executive. He is also the commander-in-chief, a foreign diplomat, and Head of State just to name a few functions. With powers endowed by the Constitution, the President’s roles are pretty well defined; however, the Constitution is also very broad in its writing leaving it to be interpreted in a variety of ways. This is just one way that the President can increase his power. Some instances that can be noted is the clause that states that the President can at times do what is necessary for the good of the nation, and when he is doing what is needed and necessary, he can bypass some of the checks and balances set forth by the Framers of the Constitution.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prisoner parole can give criminals another chance to kill. Have you ever thought about how many criminals escape punishment, and yet, the victims never had a chance to do that? Do victims receive full measure of justice? Perhaps the biggest reason to favor death penalty is to prevent the committed crime from happening again. Even if a criminal is sentenced to life without the possibilty of parole, he still has a chance to kill while in prison or even worse, go on a crime spree (Death Penalty, n.d.)…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peace and Unity

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “In politics… the President has just granted pardon to a plunderer, who was proven guilty of stealing the people’s money…”…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays