Ever since the theory of evolution, and other scientific evidence that contradicts some holy books, there has been a rise in atheism and non religious believers. But the seperation has allowed scientists to rely solely on science without having to change observations or evidence because it contradicts religion. Science is the observation of the natural world however religion deals with an element of a supernatural world. Therefore you cannot use science to prove all of religion. For example; if something was happening outside, and you could not go outside, would you be able to prove it is happening? No, but does this make it not true? No, it is true, but you cannot prove it. You however, believe it is true. Thats what religion is, belief on what you think is true. This is why religion is based on faith whereas science is based on fact.
On the other hand however, the seperation of science vs. religion has caused upset among religious believerswho are also science enthuisiasts. They believe that religion and science can go hand in hand. You can believe in science and religion even if they comtradict eachother. An example of this is Dr.Ard Louis. He is a physicist and a christian. He manages to accept the differences but still has strong faiths in both. This shows that you can believe in both despite the differences.
In conclusion i believe that the seperation of religion and science was a good thing because science cannot prove religion. In some respects it does, but major aspects of religion are supernatural elements, which cammot be proven by science. So the seperation causes less confusion, and as i believe was a good thing :)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Some people believe that only science is correct. There is no evidence of the seven days of creation except by word, whereas all theories of evolution and the Big Bang have a large amount of evidence, and hundreds of hours of research dedicated to them. Evolution and the Big Bang have explanations for and biological reasons, whereas why would a God suddenly decide to make a universe and planet for living organisms?…
- 418 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Townes argument, he is telling us that science is based on facts and logic conclusions while religion is based on faith alone. Townes said that science was used to discover order and to help us understand the world and ourselves. He believed that science was needed to help explain things in their simplest forms. On the other hand, Townes explained that religion was a way of acceptance through believing. It was a way for people to explain how they fit into the universe and how to give meaning to life. I believe that people have as much faith in science as they do in religion. It takes a large amount of faith to believe that our entire existence was created from the chaos of the universe. I believe that it is more plausible to have faith in…
- 404 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The coming from a science view religion is not acceptable to scientist to the lack of data proven facts the science cannot see you say religious people are close minded people that analyze pray the statues and but there's a lot of scientists that you give respect to religion is something deep down inside them that letting them know that there is something power more powerful then them!!.…
- 264 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
They also see science as something that shows proof that something is or is not this way or that way. On the other hand, they see religion as that of just faith, that there is nothing to prove or no experiment to prove it is real. A scientist named Laplace was asked by a Pasteur how could he believe in both and his answer was that he separates the two in compartments, one for home and one for the lab (Townes, 1966). This makes it seem like there should be a separation versus the coming together of science and religion.…
- 745 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When they tie in facts, or even religious views that provide emotions, to back up what they discover, it provides them a feeling of fulfilment. Scientists differ on whether they credit these feelings to faith or facts. “The pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling which is different for scientists than the religiosity of someone more naive.” Many scientists believe they don’t have faith because they have studied science and discovered the meaning behind things in a more technical way.…
- 727 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A good example of this is the big question of how the earth and humans were created. According to Christians, the existence of us today is completely from God’s creation. However, if we discuss this with many scientists, you would altogether get a different viewpoint as they would most likely disagree with the Christian’s belief. This is because they have their own belief that we humans were created through evolution.…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Are religious and scientific views of the world necessarily in conflict with each other? How are they either contradictory or complementary?…
- 2582 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
I do believe that religion and science can coexist. In the interview the commentator explains that one of professor Francisco Ayala's (Faith Matters. 2010, April 02) statements was that "science and religion need not be in contradiction if they are properly understood"..... "religion explains why and science explains how..... but they are one in the same" ( Lab activity: Chapter 1). They really complement each other and they don't have to be separate or contradictory to each other. When I think of religion I see it as a roadmap that leads to an expected end, and if I follow the directions I will make it to the right destination. The Bible that I have read explains how we should live our lives to obtain peace, prosperity, love and happiness. However, it does not say that there won't be hard times, grief or sadness, but it does say that there is a season for all of these things. In my experience all of these situations made me a better person and I don't know if I would have learned what I know now without experiencing them. It also tells me how to conduct financial business as well as how to love and respect others. It provides a structure for all mankind to follow that is guaranteed to lead to a purpose filled and meaning ful life. It also gives warning of what may happen if we do not maintain these principles and the damage that it could cause.…
- 764 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Scientific beliefs have a basis of solid evidence and can been proven using the scientific method and through extensive research. But there is no “scientific method” for proving religious beliefs. That is, there is no way one could know that a particular, or any religion is “true” or “false.” That therefore, raises a question, “are religious beliefs true in the same sense that scientific beliefs are true?”…
- 542 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Religion has responded successfully and unsuccessfully to the challenge of atheism as there have a number of ideas that have developed over the years that could potentially overthrow many religious believers. Two of these reasons are due to science and empirism.…
- 375 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Normally, there are minimal conflicts between scientists and theologians. They usually work in different areas of interest. Theologians are rarely interested in the tensile strength of steel. Scientists -- at work, at least -- are rarely interested in the soul, salvation, Heaven or Hell. But there are shared areas where both scientists and theologians promote their own beliefs. Often, these beliefs are in conflict.…
- 4676 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The conflict thesis, which states that there is an intrinsic intellectual conflict between religion and science, remains generally popular for the public, though most historians of science no longer support it anymore.[1][2][3][4] Other contemporary scientists such as Stephen Jay Gould, Francisco Ayala, Kenneth R. Miller and Francis Collins hold that religion and science are non-overlapping magisteria, addressing fundamentally separate forms of knowledge and aspects of life. Some theologians or historians of science, including John Lennox, Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme and Ken Wilber propose an interconnection between them.…
- 2112 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Many people believe that only science, or religion, is needed, and that the two should be completely separate. Some people believe that religion is needed as it gives them a faith, and they believe that they have seen religious beings, helping them in life. Many scientists disregard these thoughts as there is no physical evidence to be shown, whereas scientific ideas have been tested many times, proven with knowledge and experimentation. Although some religious ideas have been proved false using science, very few have, and it is almost impossible to prove that there isn't a 'God' or some sort of being guiding us in everyday life.…
- 1098 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, I think that science is much more believable than religion because science has been generally accepted to be backed up by facts, is more effective in society, helps us to find solutions, and makes more sense. A perfect quote to sum up my statements would be “Grace is a scandal. Grace is hard to believe. Grace goes against the grain…
- 1954 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Based upon my opinion and research I believe that it is not possible to be religious and at the same time, accept the teachings of modern science. As explained in the two questions below, the idea of a religion is to seek the answer to the meaning of life, and after death, live in an eternity with their God. Many religions outline the beginning of the world and how we all had come onto this earth. For example, Christianity has the Garden of Eden, and Scientology believes we were placed on the earth by aliens. Now that technology is constantly advancing at such an incredible rate, modern society relies a lot upon science to solve the mystery of how we came to be on the earth, and our purpose. The explanation by modern science diverts many away from their previous religions as they no longer need to look for a meaning and basis of life as it can be explained and supposedly proved through on going scientific research. Therefore, the two sides clash and do not allow for people to be religious and at the same time accept what modern science is proposing.…
- 1650 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays