Preview

Was the leadership of Lenin the most important reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the leadership of Lenin the most important reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917?
Vladimir Lenin was an outstanding figure of significance during the Russian Revolution. Under his strong leadership and with the help of his loyal followers, Lenin enabled the Bolsheviks to come into power, overturning the Provisional Government in the second revolution of the year. This has long been regarded as an important factor that contributed to this seizing of power. However, it is not the sole reason, nor is it the most important one, with two others being the incompetence of the Provisional Government and the poor military leadership of Kerensky. This essay will proceed to show how the leadership of Lenin acted as a trigger factor, with the poor military leadership of Kerensky being an aggravating factor, and the incompetence of the Provisional Government as the underlying factor and therefore the most significant factor contributing to the October revolution in 1917. This essay will discuss each factor in detail, before coming to a conclusion that the incompetence of the Provisional Government was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 after the revolution had taken place. Lenin had long been an influential figure in the eyes of the workers of Russia. One can in fact say that his entire life was steered into the path of being a revolutionist after the execution of his brother due to participation in anti-Tsarist activities. He became interested in radical politics and after his studies joined many (clandestine) discussion groups, quickly becoming a senior member in many, if not all, of them. This proves that his charisma and extensive knowledge was able to convince the long-standing members of radical organisations to allow him to lead them, and therefore it is very clear how Lenin was able to influence the Russians to support him and his party. Also, he was very iron-willed, brilliant and thus making him a very decisive leader unlike the Provisional Government which also lacked the support and authority. He
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?
    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate the Role of Individuals in Bringing About the Changing Influence of the Russian Communist Party, 1905-1945.

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    "Did Lenin Lead to Stalin?" Examine the Elements of Change and Continuity Within Soviet Russia 1917-1941.
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "Did Lenin Lead to Stalin?" Examine the Elements of Change and Continuity Within Soviet Russia 1917-1941.

    The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was the seizure of power by the radical Marxists led by Vladimir Lenin and was one of the pivotal moments of the 20th Century. The ramifications of the event, and the subsequent establishment of the world's first Communist regime were immediately obvious, but also had continuing repercussions for decades. This essay will argue that although Lenin and Stalin seemed to have conflicting views, in reality they shared very similar policies; Stalin just took these policies to an extreme.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    russian revoloution empathy task
    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages

    russian revoloution empathy task

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.

    In the USSR at the time of Lenin’s death there was no voting system for power. Although the Communists were the party destined to lead the USSR and there was no dangerous rival for their authority, the…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Tsarism Survive The 1905 Revolution Essay
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did Tsarism Survive The 1905 Revolution Essay

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?

    Lenin was important to the Bolshevik seizure of power as he was able to manipulate public opinion using slogans and propaganda. This was also shown early in the year, before Lenin's return to Russia from Switzerland. The Bolsheviks in Russia had printed in 'Pravda' (their newspaper) that their members and followers should support the Provisional Government, and also that they had given serious thought to the idea of combining with the Mensheviks. This was all very contrary to what Lenin wrote in his 'April Theses' which clearly laid out his views and beliefs on the subject. A key point of his 'April Theses' was "No Support for the Provisional Government", yet without him his party were proposing just that. Lenin as an individual was able to force the Bolsheviks to follow his beliefs and goals and without him they may never have chosen this course of action at all. Through his April thesis, particularly the slogans “Peace, Bread, Land” and “All Power to the Soviets”, he was able to harness the support of the Russian people.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was Lenin Responsible For The Bolsheviks Growing Hold On Power In The Years 1917
    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Far Was Lenin Responsible For The Bolsheviks Growing Hold On Power In The Years 1917

    In 1917, the Bolsheviks gained power of Russia and were able to hold onto this growing power until 1924 and later. There are several factors that could be considered to be the reason as to why they were able to seize control. It could be said that Lenin was a significant factor due to his pragmatism and his use of terror, however it also could be said that other members of the Bolshevik party such as Leon Trotsky were responsible and perhaps even the Civil War for the Bolsheviks’ hold on power.…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in 1917?
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in 1917?

    In this essay I will analyse a combination of reasons on how the Bolsheviks came to power and discuss events such as the February and October revolutions, the fall of the Tsarist rule and the Provisional government.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Lenin "an heir to Russian tradition"?
    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Lenin "an heir to Russian tradition"?

    Since the tsar, Lenin has taken the ‘throne’ and along with the Bolsheviks proceeded to turn Russia into a one-party state. It can be argued that Russia has remained almost unchanged in terms of government policies and its traditions this is shown by Lenin's oppressive policies such as censorship. Lenin was not born into power and this shows he is in fact not an "heir" to Russian tradition. Similarly he had as little time for democracy as the tsars had, and as heir to the Russian tradition had followed the oppressive system and provided the continuation of the absolutist tradition in Russian. The Kronstadt revolt (1921) was a clear proof of the absolutism of the Bolshevik control and it is seen that rather than changing- Lenin ultimately replaced one form of state authoritarianism with another.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation
    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Russian Revolution Causes

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Was Leon Trotsky More Important To The Russian Revolution
    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Was Leon Trotsky More Important To The Russian Revolution

    The Russian Revolution was a key turning point in Russian history and in many ways is responsible for shaping the country into what it stands as now. At the helm of the revolutionary group, the Bolsheviks, was Vladimir Lenin and directly beneath him stood Leon Trotsky. It is important to make the distinction between the importance of rankings, and the amount of influence these two leaders had, when making the distinction between which of the two was more essential in the Russian Revolution. The main argument presented…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics