Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?

Powerful Essays
1490 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified?
On December 8th, 1941 the United states of America, “Land of the free and home to the brave” declared war upon the Empire of Japan in response to Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbour the prior day. On December 7th, 1941, Pearl harbour was attacked and bombed by Japanese pilots without warning, destroying and crippling everything in their path. In one swift stroke Japan had silenced yet enraged the whole of the United States. To avenge all those American lives lost, the United States launched the Manhattan project, developing the greatest weapon created at that time, the Atomic Bomb. On August 6th, 1945, The Atomic Bomb was first unlatched from a bomber above the city of Hiroshima, reducing the city to rubble. Three days later, the next bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, marking the quick yet gruesome end of WWII. There has been a big debate and a lot of controversy towards the dropping of these two bombs; ‘Little Boy’ and ‘Fat man’. Was it really necessary? Some think it was necessary as the country had no other choice, but some people think differently and believe that the Atomic Bomb was an unnecessary sinister and shameful act. There are both valid and compelling arguments on both sides of this Ethical Dilemma.
Many believe that the Atomic bomb was the lesser and a necessary evil. This is because in 1941, the Japanese launched a surprise attack at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii. The Americans believed that they had not done much against the Japanese but cut trading to try and stop them from invading more of southern Asia. But this enraged the Japanese more, causing them to attack the states. This attack was uncalled for, as behind the Japanese planes left utter chaos, 2,403 dead, 188 planes destroyed and the remains of the Pacific Fleet that included 8 damaged or destroyed battleships. The U.S wanted revenge for killing all those innocent people in one swipe, so they designed the Atomic bomb, a weapon that would cause mass destruction in a matter of seconds. It was so show Japanese that is was a bad idea to start was on America, and it was a taste of their own medicine, to show them what would happen if they tried to attack again.
In addition, this was nearing the end of WWII. Hitler and Germany were already out of the picture, but Japan was still strong, holding several hundred islands in the Indian Ocean. They were the nightmare of the Americans, an extremely powerful force equipped everything from the latest technology to the toughest soldiers. The 5,000,000 soldiers in the Japanese army were trained to the extent of rather dying than surrender, trained to know and face that they could die any moment for their country. America moved to take out Japan by defeating the Japanese on several islands, but because of their kamikazes, they took heavy casualties, and the Japanese lost far less men than they did. A full-scale invasion of Japan would have cost thousands upon thousands of American lives, and that was simply unacceptable! America would have been weakened in the sense that their military could have been reduced drastically. It was estimated by the army that 500,000 to 2,000,000 American lives would be lost in a successful invasion, as the Japanese would not surrender and would rather die fighting. Dropping the atomic bombs saved American lives and killed over 50,000 Japanese in total, instead of the large number that would have died in an invasion. The bomb crippled the Japanese and stopped them from attacking the states, thus effectively ending WWII in the Pacific Ocean.
People also believed that President Harry Truman was justified in not one but both atomic bombs on Japan. Ending the war was the main reason why President Truman launched the atomic bombs in the first place. He wanted the unconditional and quick surrender of Japan, but even after the first bomb of destruction, he failed to gain this, leaving him no choice but to drop the second bomb. But with the second launch came the surrender of Japan, and World War II would come to a halt. Americans would have to no longer keep fighting in this brutal war and return troops home back to their families.
The last argument proposed from the U.S. Stated that the Director of the Manhattan Project wanted to see the price of his labours before the war ended. The equipment used to arm the Americans and to develop the atomic bomb was approximately $20 billion, and they wanted to make sure they did not waste any money. They felt like they needed to see the aftermath of the bomb, and felt like the whole world needed to see the aftermath, so after the war, there would be no more major attacks on the U.S.A.
On the other hand, some argue that the dropping of the atomic Bomb was necessary, some believe that it was immoral and unjustifiable in every way. It was simply an act of cruelty, torture, pure evil. The bombing killed over 50,000 people in Hiroshima was immoral and shameful. People who survived the blast of the bomb had their skin melted off, eyes burned out, disintegrated by a bomb with an explosion equal to over 20,000 tons of TNT. And for the Americans so stand there and watch it happen is inhumane and unacceptable. This has to be considered a war crime, the United States were too uneducated at the time. This was nothing other than a brutal murder. If the bomb wasn’t dropped, it would have saved thousands and thousands of lives. The effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with ordinary weapons had already done enough damage for the Japanese to surrender.
Furthermore, the bomb was not needed as said by the allied commander Eisenhower, as he said Japan was already largely defeated and the bomb was no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. Yet Truman ignored this advice and still decided to bomb Japan. If the bombs hadn’t been dropped, Japan possibly would have surrendered shortly as they were defeated to an extent of losing most of their navy and air force. The dropping of the American Bomb showed that they did not care what happened to Japan, as long as they won the war. The people most affected by the Atomic Bomb would not be military men who killed Americans, but innocent civilians Women and Children, I repeat, innocent children, were butchered. Many of these children died slow, horrible deaths. I can only imagine the outrage that would come from the citizens of the United States if New York had been bombed, and instead you were the ones who had to watch the skin melt off of your children's faces. “They had adopted the moral standards of the Barbarians of the Dark Ages.” Said Admiral Leahy.
Also, during the war, most of the Americans, if not all, were Christians. In 1946, a report by the Federal Council of Churches entitled Atomic Warfare and the Christian Faith, includes the following passage: “As American Christians, we are deeply penitent for the irresponsible use already made of the atomic bomb. We are agreed that, whatever be ones judgement of the war in principle, the surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible.” This was against the ten commandments of Christianity and the words of God, the Bible, which states clearly that ‘Thou Shalt not Kill.’
In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the argument, as said previously, have very strong and justifiable reasons. The Americans Certainly did a bad evil that killed thousands of innocent children and civilians, but in my opinion it was necessary, as they were putting their own country first, being independent to save as many American lives as possible. In a war like this, it is survival of the fittest. They were trying to lessen the impact and damage whilst also ending the war, as quickly as possible as they wanted no more violence. Although the Americans were unaware of the long term effects of the bomb, they did this in retaliation to the lives lost by a surprise attack that was not suspected. The Americans played fair and gave Japan 5 days to surrender. I respect President Truman’s decision and I would have agreed to give them a chance, but if America gave them another chance, it would make them look weak and Japan may attack with full force, and this will lead to more American casualties and Japanese casualties. I believe that the atomic bomb is was the lesser and necessary evil, and although many died from the bomb, it would not add up to the lives lost if the war didn’t end immediately. Statistics say that If the bomb wasn’t dropped, over ten times the casualties of the bomb would die from a full scale invasion. If the bomb wasn’t dropped, many of us wouldn’t be here today.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 Dbq

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McLaughlin, John J. “The Bomb Was Not Necessary.” History News Network (2010). Database. Web. 25 April 2014.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite its destructive consequences, the American bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to put an end to the war in the Pacific. President Truman’s choice to release a nuclear weapon on Japan was the fastest solution to ending the United States’ involvement in the Second World War, making the decision the most time efficient way out. Hiroshima’s destruction was also, very possibly, the only way for the United States to win the war, because the Japanese were very clear that they were prepared to fight until they were down to their last man. The Japanese military was the strongest in the world, so ending the war with a bang was much more appealing to Americans and the Truman Administration than fighting until there was no one left to fight. Perhaps most importantly, the dropping of the atomic bomb saved the lives of millions of American soldiers and civilians, as well as Japanese soldiers and civilians. This made it not only the quickest way to bring the soldiers home and ensure the United States’ victory, but also the best way to reduce the lives lost on both sides. The Truman Administration’s decision to drop a nuclear bomb on the Japanese was horrific, but necessary in bringing about a cost-effective, Japanese surrender that saved more lives than it took away.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the horrific atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Should the bombs have been used? The answer to that is undoubtedly clear: no. The bombs did more harm than good. The US had conducted “the world’s most devastating military mission”1, effects of which are still evident today.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary? No, it was not. Neither of the two cities were military targets. Both cities had more civilians than troops. This would also mean that we broke the rules of war. We bombed innocent civilians. This, according to multiple documents of war, is illegal. Especially since the towns had no means of defending themselves. Bombing these towns also started the Cold war arms race. Everyone wanted the atomic bomb. I believe that the dropping the 2 bombs was not necessary because we killed innocent civilians, we started an arms race, and we ended a war that was already on the verge of ending itself.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wars have occurred for various different reasons all around the world, each nation involved using their best means of defensive and offensive attacks. Weaponry has been updated as time went on, leading us from arrows and bows to powerful guns. In the 1940s during World War II, however, one weapon in particular left a huge impact. The United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II was not justified due to the fact that it was ethically wrong, an excessive use of force, and unnecessary.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1945 Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bomb not only once, but twice to finish World War Two. The first bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima August, 6th killed upwards to around 80,000 people and the second bomb dropped on Nagasaki August, 14th killed 40,000 people. The controversy of the atomic bomb is because of the amount of innocent people that were killed in Japan. Nobody will ever know the outcome of the war if we never dropped the bomb, but we do know that the war was ended because of it. Over 100,000 people lost their lives because of these bombs, but how many lives would have been lost if we never dropped them? That is the other question that can never be answered, but based…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may feel that the United States was justified in using atomic bombs against Japan. The US was obligated to use the atomic bomb, because, after the Potsdam Conference in July, US asked the Japanese to surrender in early August. Japanese said “no” and that they would never surrender. This left Truman with two very difficult decisions; one: keep fighting or two: use the atomic bomb to end the war. Truman chose the usage of atomic bomb on Japan to end the war quickly, by doing this, he saved tenth of thousands of American soldiers lives. According the Truman’s Decision to Drop the Bomb; four cities were recommended as targets: Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, because of fewer populations. The atomic barely got the Japanese to surrender. Us dropped two, then only with the intervention of the Emperor and even then, there was an attempted coup to prevent surrender. If US have hadn’t used the bomb, the war could have lasted for decades.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Atomic Bomb put a huge mark in American history. It changed the way war takes place and introduced the amass weapons of destruction to warfare. The destructive force also wiped out hundreds of thousands of people, mainly consisting of women and children. Many people were appalled by America’s immoral effort to end the war. Others disagreed and stated that it was a necessary evil to drop the atomic bomb and end the war. Even 70 years after World War II this argument continues of whether it was appropriate to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While dropping the atomic bomb was cruel and immoral, it was essential to ending the war in the Japanese Theatre of World War II, it established America as an even greater power, and it saved American lives.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First I will give the perspective of those who believe the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was indeed justified. Operation Downfall was the planned invasion of Japan but it would not be like any normal invasion. The American forces knew that they planned to confront provoked and zealous Japanese, which would cause skyrocketing casualties. The majority of the forces believed in a concept referred to as bushido, which demands bravery and extreme self-sacrifice. Honor comes from death and disgrace from surrender, so those who willingly gave their lives were esteemed and respected. This belief stems from feudal Japanese samurai warriors but is still widely accepted as a motive for war. During World War II, when the Japanese air fleet was outdated, they developed a defense of kamikaze pilots which were basically suicide bombers. This showed the United States that when backed into a corner the Japanese were going to fight back with everything they had. It was estimated that invading Japan with a normal attack would cost 1.2 million casualties (Source #2, see annotation). This was one of the most prevalent factors in President Truman’s decision to authorize the use of the atomic bomb. The other leading influence on the atomic bomb’s justification was the Japanese…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb was something that helped America win the war. However, it wasn't something that our country absolutely needed. The United States did an awful thing when it dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. If it was aimed at a military target, it is not remembered for that. It is remembered because of the civilian people whose lives were ruined by this horrible action and the terror that the photos…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays