Preview

Was Roosevelt responsible for Pearl Harbour

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2228 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Roosevelt responsible for Pearl Harbour
Was President Franklin D Roosevelt responsible for the attack on Pearl Harbour?

On December 7, 1941 the infamous bombing of Pearl Harbour by the Japanese took place, but who was really responsible? Many historians lay the blame with President Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR), citing his approach to the war as antagonistic and inciting a Japanese attack. This report however will highlight that the Japanese were the real antagonises, deliberately and purposely attacking the United States (US), United Kingdom and Holland, and Pearl Harbour was but a pawn in their war plan, thus alleviating FDR of the historical responsibility bequeathed to him over the last 70 years. The key elements within this review focus on Japan's Pacific War plans, FDR's approach to the threat of Japan, the events that led up to the Pearl Harbour attack, the 14 part message decoded; what did it say about an attack, the attack on Pearl harbour and other locations attacked within the same 24 hour period and finally; the reinforcement of Pearl Harbour and Hawaii and their shortcomings in preparedness.

In the midst of World War II, Japan devised a plan to seize all of Southeast Asia. The intentions of this plan were to take over territories of the United Kingdom, Holland and the United States of America (US) ensuring a ready supply of rubber, oil, mineral and tin, vital to the war efforts. This plan came about after the US enforced an oil and rubber embargo on Japan for their continued threat in China. There were several difficulties within the Southeast Asia plan that the Japanese government were fully aware of. They included the US occupied Philippines which stood between Japan and its conquests. They knew that an attack on the Philippines would warrant a response from the US and therefore began negotiations, but plans were already underway to attack. Their most lethal weapon was one of radio silence, enabling stealth and the inability of tracking by other countries. This was in some way also



References: Ford, D. (2011). Pacific war: Clash of empires in world war II. London: Continuum International Publishing. Trefousse, Hans L. (Hans Louis). (1958). What happened at pearl harbor? Documents pertaining to the Japanese attack of December 7, 1941, and its background. United States Bibliography Anderson, C.J. (2002). The pearl harbor attack was just one of Japan 's surprises. World War II, 16(5), 92. Ford, D. (2011). Pacific war: Clash of empires in world war II. London: Continuum International Publishing. Mark Grimsley. (2007). Japan hadn 't attacked pearl harbor? World War II, 22(5), 85-86. Murray, W., & Ishizu, T. (2009). Conflicting currents: Japan and the united states in the pacific. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. Peter Mauch. (2004). Revisiting nomura 's diplomacy: Ambassador nomura 's role in the japanese-american negotiations, 1941. Diplomatic History, 28(3), 353-383. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2004.00416.x Trefousse, Hans L United States. Congress. Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack. (1946). Investigation of the pearl harbor attack. Retreived from: http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b643511;view=1up;seq=7

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Following the close of World War II, The United States made thoughtful strides to lock Japan confidentially within its scope of influence and power. The true risk for the U.S. in post-Cold War was “armed impotence” (www.foreignaffairs.com). The U.S. guided Japanese reconstruction plans that focused on democracy and anti-Communism. The campaigns encouraged cultivation of land reorganization, establishment of self-governing trade unions, elimination of arranged marriages, granting the woman’s right to vote, extensive demilitarization, and ultimately a lawful democracy that opposed war and band Communism as a whole. The establishment of this relationship with Japan would prove to be beneficial to both nations. (Faragher, Page 701) (Fukuyama, et al)…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The two sources selected for evaluation, Code-Name Downfall: The Secret Plan to Invade Japan-And Why Truman Dropped the Bomb by Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar and Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire by Richard B. Frank are evaluated for their origins, purposes, limitations, and values.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theater of war with Japan in the Pacific was very different from the theater of war with Germany in Europe as described in Chapter 5, The War against Japan: What Was Needed and What Was Done, in Major Problems in the History of World War I . The Chapter describes the intense military and political disagreements among the Allies over strategic military objectives, the resulting implications, and consequences in fighting the war on post-war diplomacy. The Chapter also describes experiences among those serving in the War in the Pacific.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had two options, fight or take control. Japan also thought Pearl Harbor would be a good location so they could refuel. In 1941 Japan focused on taking south Pacific colonies by eliminating US interest in the region. This leads to an economic embargo by the US against the…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    December 7th, 1941 - the day in which the Japanese took action against American territories in Hawaii by “suddenly and deliberately” attacking naval and air forces stationed there (Doc.1). Along with the loss of many many lives,…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War II was full of massive battles that led every country involved to almost total destruction. Few moments stand out in American history more than Pearl Harbor. It was, and still is today, one of the most well-known events of World War II, and continues to ignite a strong nationalistic pride for the U.S.’s strong defensive comeback after Pearl Harbor. Though Pearl Harbor is renowned as a military feat, it can be argued that Japan’s victory actually was a counterproductive, strategic disgrace. Carefully examining the preparation and execution of the attack on Pearl Harbor reveals the many flaws within Japan’s military operation.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1983 In his book Infamy, John Toland suggests that Roosevelt knew about the coming attack on Pearl Harbor and let it happen; Gordon Prange’s At Dawn We Slept offers a detailed look at what all professional historians accept as the proper view of the events, mainly blaming human error and miscommunication and dismissing the idea of a conspiracy to take the county into World War II by an alleged “back door” of Pearl…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 7, 1941 the bombing of Pearl Harbor happened. The leader of Japan, Yamamoto Isoroku, sent off planes to destroy our ships. They wanted to make sure we didn’t interfere with their plans. Japan wanted to take over part of Europe and they thought we would get in the way. According to the Atomic heritage foundation, the Japanese sent over 43 fighters and 51 dive-bombers to drop bombs. They also sent 40 torpedo planes from six carriers that floated 200 miles north of Pearl Harbor. The Japanese killed 68 civilians and 2403 people died on the ship. They destroyed half of our planes too. One of the survivors said “It was my first day on the board. I was going over to check out the planes when i saw a fleet of them in the sky.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor Hawaii was attacked by the Japanese. Yoshiko Uchida was a senior at the University of California-Berkeley. She and her family, as well as millions of other Japanese- Americans were uprooted from their homes and forced into internment camps. Yoshiko Uchida uses her experience living in the early 20th century as a Japanese American during the time of World War II.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the morning of December 7th, 1941, while most Americans were sleeping, drinking coffee, reading the morning paper or attending church, thousands of the men who fight for their country were being killed. Due to a shocking attack on Pearl Harbor, a naval base near Honolulu Hawaii, there were 18 naval vessels that were sunk or heavily damaged, 188 planes that were destroyed and over 2,000 servicemen who were killed. (Perloff, Pearl Harbor: Hawaii Was Surprised; FDR Was Not). Trailing the gruesome attack executed by the Empire of Japan, the 32nd president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, presented the “Pearl Harbor Speech” to a joint congressional session. While addressing congress about Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Pearl Harbor and the Coming of the Pacific War by Akira Iriye, the author explores the events and circumstances that ended in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, an American naval base. Iriye assembles a myriad of primary documents, such as proposals and imperial conferences, as well as essays that offer different perspectives of the Pacific War. Not only is the material in Pearl Harbor and the Coming of the Pacific War informative of the situation between Japan and the United States, but it also provides a global context that allows for the readers to interpret Pearl Harbor and the events leading up to it how they may. Ultimately, both Pearl Harbor and the subsequent Pacific War between Japan and the U.S. were unavoidable due to the fact that neither nation was willing to bow down to the demands of the other.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 is an event that has intrigued many historians. An aura of mystery surrounds the motivation of the Japanese and any connection between the bombing and Roosevelt. Many different historians (and revisionists) have their own take as to the events of that day. George Morgenstern, Charles A. Beard, and Charles Tansill are three of the revisionists quoted approvingly by John McKechney in his article "The Pearl Harbor Controversy: A Debate Among Historians." McKechney uses these three revisionists to try to show that the events of that day did not take Roosevelt completely by surprise. In fact, according to McKechney, the President knowingly provoked the attacks against Pearl…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: College of Public Affairs. “Operation Downfall: Planned Invasion of the Islands of Japan in World War II” (PDF) Portland State University. Web 23 Oct. 2012…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "World War Two - Japanese Internment Camps in the USA." 10 September 2012. History on the Net. 11 November 2012. <http://www.historyonthenet.com/WW2/japan_internment_camps.htm>.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael W. Doyle, “A Liberal View: Preserving and Expanding the Liberal Pacific Union,” T. V. Paul and John A. Hall, ed. International Order and the Future of World Politics, Cambridge…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays