Preview

Was Hannibal Ever Close To Getting To Rome?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Hannibal Ever Close To Getting To Rome?
The final question in need of asking is, was Hannibal ever close to completing his was Hannibal ever close to getting to Rome. The answer to that question is that Hannibal withdrew before he could attempt the final attack on Rome. As explained by Polybius, The consuls Gnaeus Centumalus and Publius Sulpicus Galba… then boldly led out these troops Drew them up in battle order in front of the city, and thus checked Hannibal’s intended attack. The Carthaginians had at first pressed forward eagerly with the alluring hope that they might even capture Rome by direct assault; but when they saw the enemy drawn up in battle formation… they abandoned the idea of attempting a direct attack, and turned instead to ravaging the surrounding …show more content…
As Leonard Cottrell stated Hannibal had a sense of arrogance, as well as confidence, an example being when he attended “a lecture given by an academician named Phormio, on “the duties of army commanders.” after the lecture Antiochus asked Hannibal what he thought of it. “well” replied Hannibal… “I’ve listened to some old fools in my time, but this one beats them all.” Another example would be in a meeting with Scipio his antagonist who asked “Hannibal whom he esteemed the third greatest general. “Myself beyond doubt,” replied the Carthaginian. Scipio laughed and then asked, “what would you have said if you had conquered me?” “then” came the reply, “I would have placed Hannibal… before all other commanders.” It was the “memory of Hannibal [which] would endure, brilliant as a general… [as] the Historian Arnold Toynbee would say his searing course of conquest left an imprint still diescernible in Italy.” As Spray writes in the book Hannibal “we have the impression that [Hannibal] had admirers and faithful adherents rather than men who were personally close to him. His peers in Carthage were suspicious of him and were jealous of the power and fame of the Barca family.” Lastly the Romans viewed Hannibal “[as] the cause of great evil. They insisted that Hamical and his sons had consciously provoked a war.” With all the people of that time’s view on Hannibal in the eyes of those in the ancient world it’s in the book Hannibal which gives the best summary of who Hannibal was. As written by Spray “[Hannibal] was and rained Carthage’s loyal servant, no more and no less. That is how we read him from his actions: a great man unshakeable faithful to his native

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ Barbarian Invasions

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages

    8. According to Procopius, “some say that Rome was not captured in this way by Alaric.” What do they say happened?…

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hannibal resumed his siege of Saguntum and conquered it after a terrible and costly siege. Hannibal, although he held preeminence in Carthage, still had to rely on his allies to keep him in power. A delegate was sent to Rome to answer a question regarding whether Hannibal had acted on his own or had the approval of the Carthaginian senate. The delegate, according to Livy, was the best orator in Carthage. He quickly quashed the argument regarding the border of Hasdrubal because the Carthaginian council had not been part of the talks. Furthermore, he argued that the Romans had broken the treaty after the First War by invading Sardinia; finally, he stated that Hannibal broke no treaty because the Saguntines did not have an alliance with Rome when the treaty between Hasdrubal formed. However, the Romans did not care about that, they wanted peace or war. The Carthaginians declared the Romans needed to choose, and the Romans chose the later. At this critical juncture, Carthage still held with Hannibal and wanted to help him.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the overview, prelude, and battle of Lake Trasimene will be analyzed and discussed to understand the brilliance behind one of the greatest military tactical attacks in history. The Battle of Lake Trasimene was waged by one of the most charismatic, smart, and cunning generals of all time in Hannibal. Hannibal, the son of Hamilcar Barca of Carthage, was raised to eat, breath, and hate Rome from the beginning of his childhood. Livy states that, “From the day when he was proclaimed commander in chief, he seemed to regard Italy as his assigned field of action, and war with Rome as a duty imposed upon him.”(Livy 21.5, Line 1-3.) This inner rage that was instilled in him as a child is a driving force that can be seen throughout this battle as well as his remaining campaigns against the Romans.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 600 BCE and 600 CE, many empires throughout the world rose to power as a result of powerful military organizations that allowed them to defend themselves and conquer new land. Forceful armies were especially important in both Rome and Greece, where their dynamic military permitted them to dominate and expand their territories, thus increasing their empire’s power and influence. Most notably in the Roman Empire, the strong martial force led the state to victory in several battles, including the Battle of Zama. The empire’s powerful military obliterated Carthage and led to Rome subsequently taking control of the area. As a result of winning such battles, Rome took control of more land and expanded its territory to take over much of Southern…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One general, wreaking havoc throughout the Roman lands was known as Hannibal Barca. Following in his father’s footsteps as a superior military general, he challenged Rome in battle every chance he could. After several attempts of coaxing Rome into battle he achieves a decent victory at the Battle of Trasimene in 217…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suetonius Battle Analysis

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They expected to easily slice the outnumbered enemy into pieces, but they were unnoticeably channeled into a tight pack (). The Romans had two great advantages on their side, they were much more skilled in the tactics and arts of battle and they also had the position on the defensive. Roman soldiers were accustomed to defending themselves while attacking fortified positions by forming up in a tight phalanx formation, the men positioned shoulder to shoulder, their shields creating one great continuous shield, a mobile walled fortification. Boudicca’s spear throwers, hurling their weapons uphill, were wholly ineffective. The spears that made contact with the Roman force bounced harmlessly off the impenetrable shield barrier.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scipio got his reputation as a great general through defeating the Carthaginian general Hannibal. In 210 B.C. When Rome decided to send reinforcements to the battlefield in Spain there was no senior general willing to head down there, so Scipio volunteered to lead the fight against Carthage.In 211 B.C., Scipio was put in charge of Rome's forces in Spain, Two years later, he took the city of Carthago Nova. In 208 B.C. At the Battle of Baecula Scipio defeated Hasdrubal (Hannibal's brother), who fled to Italy with some of his troops. Scipio defeated the rest of the Carthaginian forces in Spain retaking it for Rome in 206 B.C. He next planned to take his forces to Africa after being elected consul in 205 B.C. but ran into some opposition from the Roman government. He then traveled to North Africa with as many troops as he could muster to fight Hannibal. Hannibal’s government then called him back to protect carthage. Scipio and Hannibal finally faced each other in the Battle of Zama In 202 bc, during the battle the Roman soldiers sounded horns which frightened the carthaginian elephants causing them to…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then for some years Carthage was the most successful who was commanded by Hamilcar. However, at the battle at the Aegates Islands in 241, the Carthaginians were beaten so badly that they requested peace. This agreement involved leaving Sicily and paying a huge tax. Rome now had complete control of Sicily.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, indeed throughout history, Rome ultimately exhibited a readiness to adapt its military tactics and strategy to successfully confront particular challenges. The Roman military was a highly organized institution. There was a straightforward system of rank, and a number of different splitting up of the basic unit. The entire basis of Roman infantry tactics was the idea that by keeping troops in arranges, one could fight more successfully. Most military commanders of the day simply had their troops rush passionately at the enemy, relying on better numbers, better soldiers, or luck to hold the day. The Romans realized that they could not always rely on these, so they turned to strategy. Each situation was wrapped up differently, taking into account land, the type and strength of the opponent's troops, and the type and strength of the Roman's troops. The Romans also thought that the best tactic would be the one that had the most effect without exposing the troops to unnecessary risk. One of them was to cut off their opponent from his resources. Armies run on their stomachs and equipment, and both require regular supplies. Without a stable supply of food and water, an army will starve or dehydrate killing or uncomforting the troops and they would fall apart. The Roman Soldiers would attack the resources themselves. When they conquered territory, they took as much as they could. This not only gave them more food, it prevented it from falling into their opponent's hands and they would also try to cut off the transportation so the amount of supplies that could reach the enemy was severely reduced. One of the most famous tactics that the Romans used was called “siege”. Siege was a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender. The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built to prevent the enemy from escaping. The ongoing siege would eventually…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alaric Raid Rome

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alaric soon realized that he has been deceived by the Roman Empire once again. Time and time again, the Romans demonstrated to Alaric that they will barely tolerate the Goths and would massacre them at any available opportunity. Following the ambush, Alaric realized that there was no chance of formulating a treaty with the Empire. Ultimately, what was most important to Alaric was feeding his people. His people were in desperate need of land and food and “At last it was felt that the famine could be borne” (Bradley 92). Therefore, Alaric decided the best course of action would be to raid Rome itself.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both, Scipio and Hannibal, are similar in the sense that they bring up their enemies’ weaknesses to induce their armies. Scipio mentions to his soldiers that their enemies have lost…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    trojan war

    • 1638 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trojan War is one of the most legendary stories about warfare of all time. There has been much debate regarding the historical accuracy of sources about the war, leading many historians to disagree about whether the war actually occurred or not. Due to the lack of primary sources, the likelihood of some of the sources being untrue is very high, however there is too much uncovered evidence that supports the Trojan War’s existence to extinguish the idea that it did occur. The Linear B Tablets gave historians information on the lifestyle and the fall of the Mycenaean Empire. Euripides’ Women of Troy gave a detailed account of the aftermath of the war on the women involved. The Hittite Diplomatic Archives offer information about the location of Troy and suggestions about the circumstances surrounding the Trojan War. One of the most famous recounts of the Trojan War, The Iliad, clearly narrates the events that occurred during the war. By investigating the archaeological evidence from each source, we can draw conclusions and consider the usefulness of sources in assisting our understanding of the Trojan War.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays