Preview

War Is Inevitable, Therefore We Should Work to Be Good at It.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
War Is Inevitable, Therefore We Should Work to Be Good at It.
War is taken to mean a conflict often carried on by force of arms between nations or parties within a nation. It is carried on by force of arms in a series of battles or campaigns. There have been a great many wars throughout history. Since the earliest recorded history, human beings have been effective and organized at making war. The technology of war has also improved, to the point that today, weapons exist that cannot be used without risking the complete destruction of both sides. This was the basis of the cold war during the second half of the twentieth century. War is costly, both in human and material terms. History might show that war is inevitable and there seem to be a number of possible causes. Increasing population, Religion, differing ideologies and competition for resources, all appear to play a part in the cause of war. Desire for greater freedom and human rights has, in more recent years, been a driving force in civil wars. Finally, there is the fundamental question – do human beings naturally tend to make war? This essay will attempt to examine war and its causes in order to come to a conclusion as to whether it is inevitable. Today, with the United Nations trying to settle disputes peacefully and actively trying to protect human rights, war is not inevitable. However, if war is inevitable, a nation should work to be good at it. As the cold war has shown, to be very good at war may actually work to avoid major conflict and its associated costs. Being good at war means being strong enough so that nations can defend their territory and making it less likely they will be threatened. In the 21st century, being good at war means possessing the latest technology for conducting war.

Keegan (1993, p. 1) states that warfare is almost as old as man himself. Since the earliest recorded history, there have been wars. Conflict has always been a part of humanity. The reasons for every war will be different but overall, in ancient times, as farming practices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In David Barash’s book, Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies, he encompasses a large range of entries on the topic of war. In his introduction, he writes, “One of my goals in Approaches to Peace has been to bring together material that has a relatively long ‘shelf life’ that transcends the latest crisis or fad.” From his text, the material sheds different perspectives in explaining how the human race can move towards global peace. His first chapters digs into different elements of war. Like many problems, in order to prevent it, one must look at the cause of the problem. Thus, throughout his first chapter, from the viewpoint of war as a global problem, a few different authors contribute articles on the causes of war. As expected,…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Nations Go to War

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why do notions go to war? What is the reasoning behind their actions? John G. Stoessinger analyzes these questions in his book, Why Nations go to War. Stoessinger believes that to understand the war, you must understand the leaders of the war. When you understand the leaders you understand their actions and when you understand their actions, you have the answer to the question, "Why do nations go to war?" In this review paper I am going to review each chapter individually, 1-10. I will then give a brief summary of the book and what I think as a whole based on my reading.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Nations Go to War

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In John Stoessinger’s work on “Why Nations go to War” he examines ten wars that have occurred since 1914 and the one currently taking place today. These wars include World War One, World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam War, Yugoslavian War, Indo-Pakistani War, Arab-Israel War, Iran-Iraq and Iraq-Kuwait War, War on Terror, and Wars in Rwanda and Darfur. Each of these wars have many things in common, but the one thing that sticks out above many of the other statistics and reasons is that “no nation that began a major war in the twentieth century emerged a winner” (Stoessinger 387). So after reading this quote you begin to ask yourself, why then would a nation choose to start a war and face the difficulties and often tragic outcomes that coincide with war. Stoessinger thesis on why nations go to war: nations go to war out of fear and misconception that leaders have of other nations.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been movements that support or oppose war throughout all of history. The 20th century saw this movement coalesce into a much larger and more diverse series of society changing events. Spanish-American war, World War I, World War II, the Cold War, Korea, Vietnam and Desert Storm were all wars that helped American society evolve into what it is today. For each of the conflicts, there were opposing points of view as to the amount of involvement or to even become involved at all. The pro-war or more conservative point of view lists strength and strong support for our allies as a primary focal point. The anti-war or liberal point of view is more of an isolationist or pacifist opinion that believes that diplomacy and understanding will resolve issues. This paper will discuss the opposing points of view leading up to each of the primary conflicts of the 20th century.…

    • 3507 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 5th century, the philosopher Plato insightfully noted, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war,” with history showing this to be true. People have continued to engage in all manner of conflicts, be they petty arguments or large-scale confrontations from which valuable lessons have been learnt about human nature and the present. History has revealed the flaws and primitive nature of people irrespective of the mistaken belief that progress has led to civilisation and order. Past conflicts teach that individuals, communities and even nations do not learn from past mistakes but continue to repeat them and that despite eventually being resolved, the effects have the ability to linger and haunt subsequent generations. History also teaches that conflict invariably occurs when people or nations act for self-interest and personal gain, or and when uncompromising authorities exploit their absolute power over citizens to ensure their authority remains unquestioned. Also by understanding the causes of past conflicts, individuals may reflect on their own behaviours and hopefully prevent them from occurring in the present, or if they do, provide a guide as to how to best minimise the damage they cause by knowing how to resolve them quickly and equitably before they spread beyond the main combatants which they invariably do.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse- Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death- rode together during the 20th century to bring war, disease, and starvation to the world. It is estimated that around 88 million people perished as a result of the two world wars, with over half of the dead of WWII being civilians. The war machine residing over the world was anything but humane. It is interesting then that just a few decades later there is growing debate about how war can be made humane, with many proponents of the idea that it has already become more humane. This essay will first raise the question of what it means to be humane and will give a general definition of war, because the definitions you take of those terms can greatly affect your answer. It will assess popular arguments about humane warfare, including the increased value of human life and new technology, which have been said to have made war more humane. It will conclude, however, that although countries of the West may have adopted such characteristics, this is essentially asymmetrical because adversaries of the West do not tend to play by the same rules. Therefore, although war can be made more humane, it is not easy to say to what extent that will happen.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War never ends quietly; while the battlefield tells the most immediate brutal stories, it is the aftermath that shows the greatest tragedy. The Vietnam War is not an exception; it resulted in countless damages, the worst being the psychological trauma suffered by its participants. This therefore becomes a recurring subject explored by many Vietnam War authors, who wrote of an experience they lived first hand. The depiction of psychological trauma in their works heightens the brutality of the war and criticises its tragic futility.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: 1. By Dr. Colin S. Gray, Professor of International Politics and Strategic Studies at the University of Reading, UK. The author of 22 books, his most recent (published in 2007) are Fighting Talk: Forty Maxims on War, Peace, and Strategy; and War, Peace, and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. This article was originally a paper presented at the Air Force Symposium on Counterinsurgency, Air War College, Maxwell AFB, AL, 24–26 April 2007.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why War?

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is war inevitable? It appears that the answer to this question is yes. However, war is unpredictable and must be studied based on individual circumstances, actions taken, and reactions. States disagree with each other on many subjects and conflicts arise often. To answer this question, we must first examine the causes of a conflict, evaluate the outcome and determine any alternatives that may exist. Then we can analyze some alternative theoretical outcomes compared to the actual conclusions. The Peloponnesian War provides an excellent example to be evaluated. The following gives a brief history of the war, causes of the war, and the importance of its study.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Warfare Is Wrong

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humanity always resolved their conflicts with one another with various weapons. The only difference is as over time, so do the methods of combat. Warfare is wrongfully defined as "the process of military struggle between two nations or groups of nations; war." (Warfare). This untrue definition induced many to wrongfully assume that only one type of warfare exists; Leading to believe it only happens on the battlefield during a war between countries. The actual definition of "warfare" doesn't imply military action or combat limited to only soldiers, yet it's defined as a direct act of aggression that ends with individuals emotionally or physically scarred.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warfare did not come about in a very typical manor. The Agricultural Revolution influenced warfare in a few different ways; some argue that it created war. The Agricultural Revolution turned the peaceful hunter and gatherer civilizations into the violence thriving cultures that were encountered. “Organized” violence has also changed a great amount, from little or no conflict at all, to huge large scale wars in which hundreds upon thousands are brutally murdered.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benjamin Franklin once said, “There is no such thing as a good war or a bad peace.” Franklin argues that no war can be justified due to the countless casualties resulting from each war, and no peace can be claimed as being “bad”. As seen in significant wars throughout history, wars may in fact have both positive and negative results. Specifically, the Korean War and the American Revolution had a telling impact on the world; the Korean War, which bore millions of unnecessary casualties, and the American Revolution, which laid a foundation or future rises of democracy, are two examples that qualify Franklin’s statement.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inevitability of War

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people believe in a deep-root theory, that this predisposition to violence is a component of evolution. E. O. Wilson is considered the “father of Sociobiology” and is a respected scientist in his field. In his article “Is War Inevitable”, he mentions an old parable. A scorpion wants to ride on the back of a frog across a stream. The frog hesitates at first but then realizes that if the scorpion stings him while they’re in the water they will both perish. So the frog agrees and halfway across the water the scorpion stings him. As they both drown the frog asks why he did that. The scorpion replied “because it’s in my nature.” Further in this article Wilson argues that war is “human’s hereditary curse”, and explains that, with the necessity of survival, our prehistoric ancestors have handed down over generations the “engrained” social behavior of competition and contention towards each other. These instincts, he says, started as small tribes of homo-sapiens fought over territories of land during the hunting and gathering era. Food was scarce so territorial conflict was an imminent product of this situation. Even with the…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics