War and Peace Among Peoples and Nations
Department of History and Geography
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Baltimore, Maryland 21251-0001.
War and Peace Among Peoples and Nations: A Historical Examination of the development of World War II, and the impact on Europe and the world.
By
Instructor: Dr Aubrey A. Thompson.
Course/Class: History 102.
Date: Monday, April 8th, 2011
INTRODUCTION:
Dating back to ancient civilizations, humans have always engaged in war and conquests. With civilization, man seems to have developed two sets of opposing traits: individualistic traits like selfishness and competitiveness versus sociable traits like loyalty, self-sacrifice and kindness. The first set of traits likely to stimulate war while the second set of traits brings peace and togetherness. [1] The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines war as “a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations ”. Wars take different forms: tribal wars, wars for empire, wars for independence and wars for revenge. Whether or not these wars brought actual progress is popularly debated. Civilization, in this context, means a relatively high level of cultural and technological development[2] while progress is a gradual betterment in the development of humankind.[3] Just as civilization improves the quality of life of man, civilization has equally improved the “quality” of wars. Specialized arms are being fashioned daily: guns, missiles, submarines, fighter jets and bombs are among the blessings of civilization.
The ideas of war, progress and civilization are somewhat interrelated in the sense that civilization brings about the organization of groups of people into states and nations; while progress involves population growth, industrialization, trade and economic growth and when these nations relate with one another, war or peace results. The peace and treaties that may follow a war can also be said to
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Baltimore, Maryland 21251-0001.
War and Peace Among Peoples and Nations: A Historical Examination of the development of World War II, and the impact on Europe and the world.
By
Instructor: Dr Aubrey A. Thompson.
Course/Class: History 102.
Date: Monday, April 8th, 2011
INTRODUCTION:
Dating back to ancient civilizations, humans have always engaged in war and conquests. With civilization, man seems to have developed two sets of opposing traits: individualistic traits like selfishness and competitiveness versus sociable traits like loyalty, self-sacrifice and kindness. The first set of traits likely to stimulate war while the second set of traits brings peace and togetherness. [1] The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines war as “a state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations ”. Wars take different forms: tribal wars, wars for empire, wars for independence and wars for revenge. Whether or not these wars brought actual progress is popularly debated. Civilization, in this context, means a relatively high level of cultural and technological development[2] while progress is a gradual betterment in the development of humankind.[3] Just as civilization improves the quality of life of man, civilization has equally improved the “quality” of wars. Specialized arms are being fashioned daily: guns, missiles, submarines, fighter jets and bombs are among the blessings of civilization.
The ideas of war, progress and civilization are somewhat interrelated in the sense that civilization brings about the organization of groups of people into states and nations; while progress involves population growth, industrialization, trade and economic growth and when these nations relate with one another, war or peace results. The peace and treaties that may follow a war can also be said to
Bibliography: Arika, Iriye. The origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific. 10th impression. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 1996. xx. Print. Cross, Robin. The Battle of Kursk: Operation Citadel 1943. 1st ed. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 2002. xx. Print. Dallin, David. The Big Three: The United States, Britain and Russia. 1st ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1945. Print. Gilmartin, Mary. Gallaher, C. et al., 2008. Key Concepts in Political Geography, Sage Publications Ltd. : Imperialism/Colonialism. pg.116 Keegan, John Lyons, Graham. The Russian version of the Second World War. New York: Facts on File, Inc, 1976. Print. Mace, Nigel. "British Historical Epics in the Second World war." Britain and the Cinema in the Second World War. Edited. Phillip M. Taylor. New York: St Martin 's Press, Inc., 1988. Print. Raman, T.A. What does Gandhi want?. 1st Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1942. xx. Print. Saerchinger, Cesar. The way out of war. 1st Ed. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1940. xx. Print. Sulzberger, C.L. World War II. 1st ed. New York: American heritage Press, Inc., 1985. xx. Print. Tucker, Spencer, and Pricilla Roberts. "Canada, Role in the War." Encyclopedia of World War II : a political, social, and military history. 1st ed. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2005. Web. Waszak, Leon. Agreement in Principle. 1st ed. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1996. xx. Print. Wegs, Robert. Europe Since 1945: A concise History. 1st ed. New York: St. Martin 's Press, Inc., 1977. xx. Print. [4] [5] Saerchinger, Cesar. The way out of war. (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1940), 12 [6] Gilmartin, Mary [7] Dallin, David. The Big Three: The United States, Britain and Russia. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1945), 52. [8] Dallin, David. The Big Three: The United States, Britain and Russia. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1945), 57. [9] Keegan, John. The Second World War. (New York: Penguin Books USA Inc., 1989), 10 [10] Keegan, John [11] George Q. Flynn, The Draft, 1940-1973 (University Press Of Kansas: 1993) 11Tucker, Spencer, and Pricilla Roberts