Virtually Face to Face
Virtually Face-to-Face: Technology vs. People Between the two articles, “Frequently Asked Questions About eLearning” by eLearners.com and “The Sensuous Classroom: Focusing on The Embodiment of Learning” by Suzanne M. Kelly it is easy to gather the differences between a face-to-face school environment and a “virtual classroom”. Although one seems to be neutral to which is better the other clearly states that face-to-face learning is more beneficial. The two articles also look at both sides of the same issue, although Suzanne seems to favor face-to-face learning. The two types of learning both teach the students something, and both have opportunities to “discuss” class material. Although the differences out way the similarities, some may find one better than the other depending on their life style. The pros of an actual classroom may attract more students, especially the hands on learners. For example Suzanne M. Kelly states in her essay that, “none of what I’ve described could have been experienced online” (177). Whereas an online classroom is, “a substitute for traditional education “(178), a room full of real people is just better because there is no, “lack of face-to-face interaction” (182) or, “feelings of isolation” (182). There is nothing that can compare to the quality of learning in a room of real people, or “dragging one’s exhausted body into class with readings in hand, being (more or less) awake, alert, listening, and ready to open ones mouth” (179). As unappealing as that sounds, it’s a great life experience, and there is nothing that comes close to living out real life with real people. Students just can’t get the same quality of education in a “virtual classroom” as in a traditional face-to face-environment. Sure maybe they will save some money, but will they really be living?