Preview

Virginia and Massachusetts in Terms of Economy and Society: a Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
660 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Virginia and Massachusetts in Terms of Economy and Society: a Comparison
During the time period of the colonization in the Americas, people from all over Europe came with their own desires and hopes for this strange and mysterious land. Some came for religious freedom, and some came for wealth, fame, and glory. No matter what purpose they had, they all piled onto a boat and sailed a vigorous journey to the continent of North America. As the people settled and founding colonies, people with certain desires decided to go to a particular colony because of how the colony functioned and how its viewpoints ere set. Don’t StealTwo colonies, Virginia and Massachusetts, were part of England’s expansion into the new world. Virginia, located in the Southern colonies, was founded mainly for an economic purpose, while Massachusetts was founded by colonists seeking religious freedom. These and many other reasons illustrate that it doesn’t matter who rules a colony- there can still be many differences between the two.
The society in Virginia compared to Massachusetts are very different. Don’t StealOne thing is that they attracted different kinds of people depending on each colony’s environment. The settlement in Virginia was mainly formed for financial reasons while Massachusetts was conceived of by a group of Puritan separatists from the English Church seeking religious freedom. Virginia was known for the production of “cash crops”, such as tobacco. Since colonists were unable to find any gold in the new world, they decided to profit via means of agriculture. In Massachusetts, The Puritans that settled there proposed only to form a “purified” version of the Anglican Church from England. The Puritans were a busy, educated, and somewhat industrious group of people. The Massachusetts colony consisted of non-separatists reformers. Overall, Massachusetts wanted an educated and religion-oriented society.
The land and labor in both colonies were different as well, but mainly by means of available workers. Don’t StealThe land in Virginia was abundant, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In early America there were several colonies but the ones that stood out the most were the New England Colonies and the Virginia colony. There were many differences, for example, New England colonies were full of families while the Virginia colony was mostly dominated by males. They mostly had differences and had few things in common.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before I discuss the differences in these two colonies, I would like to give you some background information on them. Massachusetts was a New England Colony founded by John Winthrop in 1628. King James the first founded Virginia in1607. The first colony of Virginia was Jamestown. Massachusetts’ first two communities, Boston and Salem, were developed around the same time. Both Virginia and Massachusetts were royal colonies.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is many differences between the New England and the Chesapeake colonies, for example their different economic sources. The New England people left Europe in hopes to find economic prosperity and a better chance at life. For instance many young families set out to the Americas during the early 1600’s according to document B. In the New England Colonies the main source of profit was through Fishing, ship building, and lumbering. The colonist knew that this economy basis would bring in the most profit because of the infertile soil in the area. In addition the climate was very different in contrast to the Chesapeake colonies were they would make cash crops due to the high humidity. The Chesapeake colonist made profit through cash crops and a plantation economy. We see that many men went to Virginia in hope to get money quick, and they did not plan to stay long due to the lack of women incorporated in document C. The economies of the Chesapeake region where centralized around cash crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. This was the easiest and most efficient way to make money due to the cheap labor from indentured servants. Indentured servants would later show problems in Bacon’s Rebellion thus making wealthy land owners turn their heads to slaves from Africa through the triangular trade for free labor. The Chesapeake and the New England colonies had ways to make money, but where very different in how they made it due to geographic and social differences.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main cause for the differences in their economy is due to the climate and location of each of the colonies. For example, the Virginia colony had good fertile soil and had the perfect weather condition for growing crops, while on the other hand, Massachusetts was a mountainous region that did not have as good of soil. Because of this, Virginia’s economy was based on crops, mainly tobacco, and the Massachusetts colony had to find other ways to use their natural resources to boast their economy. The Massachusetts colony had a lot of forests and trees, so they specialized in shipbuilding. The New England economy also consisted of fishing, and a small amount of crops, but nothing comparable to what Virginia was putting out in tobacco. The economy was clearly more diverse in the Massachusetts colony but there was something the Virginia colony had that Massachusetts did not, and that was land. Because there was an abundant amount of cheap land, it drew more colonists to that region. Another part of their contrasting economy was trade. Virginia was involved in the triangular trade, which traded slaves from Africa with goods from the colonies and England. Massachusetts trade differed from that of the south in two ways, “The lack of staples to exchange for English goods was a relative disadvantage, but the abundance of their own shipping and mercantile enterprise worked in their favor” (Tindall, 123).…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This essay explains and shows the differences between the Virginia colony and the Massachusetts colony. People all over Europe started coming down to the “new world” (America), they came to the new world for many reasons such as land, food, religion and much more. Before I start to contrast between the 2 colonies I’m going to give a general background on them. Massachusetts was established in 1620 and Virginia was established in 1607. Virginia’s colony was Jamestown and Massachusetts was Salem and Boston.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The variations within the share of categories were improbably massive and their entire economic structure differed from one another. Virginia had additional risky culture and social science where-as Massachusetts had an additional stable economy. The economy of Virginia was primarily based exclusively on the assembly of tobacco. The plantation homeowners had to shop for slaves to figure the fields that the slave traffic trade in Virginia was conjointly an enormous issue. The plantation homeowners were within the terribly made, elite class and just about ran the politics.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the first two regions of America to be colonized, Virginia and Massachusetts had many similarities. However, their differences are what defined their society and economy and made them unique. Virginia and Massachusetts differ socially in terms of religion and demographics and economically in terms of production focus and labor usage.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development of areas and their politics can be greatly affected by many things, but one of the major developmental factors is economics. If two areas have vastly different economies, they will develop vastly different political systems. One such case can be found when exploring the development of Massachusetts and Virginia in the periods of 1607 to 1750.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The settlements of Virginia and Massachusetts were both established during relatively the same time, but the ways that they were established differed tremendously. Virginia had difficulty establishing itself; there were many errors and failures, especially in the beginning. Massachusetts, on the other hand, was extremely successful. The settlers made smart decisions in provisions and planning that resulted in a prosperous colony. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their leadership quality. Virginia, initially, had weak leadership until John Smith who established a much more rigid government system within the colony. Massachusetts enjoyed successful leadership from the beginning with Joseph Winthrop. Joseph Winthrop was able to successfully develop the settlement, and a respected, well thought out society. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their work ethic. Virginia produced slothful workers and relied heavily on labor from the Natives. The Puritans of Massachusetts held onto a rigid lifestyle and were very hard-working. The differences in the settlement’s upbringing were not the only thing that divided the two colonies; the differing views on religion helped to shape the economy of both…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The demographics between these two colonies differentiated greatly at first, but transcended to an almost equal status through the years to follow. The majority of English colonists that voyaged to Virginia in the seventeenth century were single men in their twenties. They saw Virginia as a place where quick profits could be earned before returning to Great Britain. Few had any intention of staying more than a couple of years in Virginia. This is in contrast to the New England colonies. Here the communities were composed…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    european settelments

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    New England colony economics were influenced by religion. Chesapeake economics were influenced by the ambition for gold and money. Most New England economics came from mixed farming. Chesapeake economics were obtained from tobacco cultivation. " In the interim recommends(that) all tradesmen and laborers consider the religious end of their callings, which is that receiving such moderate profit as may enable them to serve God and their neighbors with them arts and trades comfortably" (Doc. #E). Colonists in Conneticut believed that if farmers and tradesmen received proper wages they would avoid oppressing which is a sin. New England colonies were ruled by Puritans, and most settlers were puritan also. They wanted to impress God and carry out his plan of a great land( Massachussets Bay). Document "C" shows how most emigrants bound for Virginia in 1635 were majority men. Men were needed to work the tobacco plantations, and help develop the colony of Virgina. " There was no talk. . . but dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold. . ."(Doc. F). the main prioirty of Virgina was to obtain gold, and indentured servants were perfect for the job.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The motives for moving to the New World behind the two colonial areas helped shape the differences between the Chesapeake and New England societies. Many of the ships going to the Chesapeake region in the 1600’s consisted of single people, mostly men, in search for wealth, gold, and a better life in the New World. At least one third of the freemen in Virginia in 1673 were single freemen (Doc. G). With the residents of the Chesapeake being mainly single men at this time, it only made sense that their motive behind moving to the New World was to find wealth. They had no responsibilities other than themselves; therefore, the want for wealth would be appealing more so to single men causing the Chesapeake colonies to be a majority of this group of people. On the contrary, most people who migrated to New England did so as a way to find religious freedom. This meant that New England colonies would be inhabited mainly by families and couples who held their religion high as a priority. On a ship’s list of emigrants bound for New England in 1635,…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1647, Massachusetts required every town to have a public school. In the south, plantations were the centers of town and sometimes supplied a church and school, however their main focus were the crops and the work. Since the north had more schools and universities, the educated class resulted in a different culture than the south. The northern colonies had more diverse religious groups than the south. Many Dutch and French colonists also established their own towns in the north. The most prominent religious group in the north were the Puritans. Their main objective was to purify the Anglican church by establishing a model town. The southerner’s motives were to sell their crops and start plantations. The southerners were still religious people but less than the Puritans in the north. The different motives for colonizing the Atlantic coast led to a diverse religious society. The different cultures of the northern and southern colonies resulted in different social interactions, education, and different religious…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia and Massachusetts were the first two colonies settled by England in the New World. However, these colonies were very different from each other. Virginia’s economy, based heavily on slaves and other low-class workers, resulted in a very small, rich class having all influence and power. Massachusetts, in contrast, had an economy with a large middle class of “equals,” resulting in a more democratic government than that of Virginia. Overall, the first two English colonies in the Americas had extremely separate ways of creating economic and Economic development usually has a lasting influence on the political structure of any up-and-coming area. This certainly was the case for Virginia and Massachusetts. The Southern economy was based on the production of cash crops, predominantly tobacco, rice, and indigo. Crops were grown on large plantations that, by the mid 1600’s, had begun to use African slaves and lowly whites as the labor source. This meant that a lot of people worked for only a few people. Thus, the plantation owners tended to be wealthy, and they acted like it too. Many landowners hired a person in England to ship them goods that would fit the lifestyle. As a result, the South was cash poor, but the land and products owned had great potential value. The Massachusetts economy could not have been more different. Although the use of slaves and other servants did exist, it was miniscule compared to what was occurring in Virginia. Also, while plantation success depended on one system that could fail at any time, the Northern economy was more stable and diverse. In part because of the landscape, the Massachusetts colony was dependent on anything from shipbuilding, fishing, and whaling to farming, store-owning, and other types of artisan work. This allowed for a flexible economy with a large middle class that likely would survive if one market crashed. Meanwhile, if there had been a drought or drop in demand for tobacco, the whole Southern economy would have…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays