Preview

Violinist Theory

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violinist Theory
Throughout the class we have opened our minds to three different views on abortions. After reading and understanding each philosopher’s argument I agree with Thomson. Unlike Marquis who argues that most abortions are wrong because it deprives a fetus of its future, and Warren who states that abortions are permissible because a fetus is not a person; Thomson believes that abortions are permissible under normal circumstances because a woman has a right to stop something from using her body against her own will. We will look at Thomson’s argument compared to Marquis to prove that Thomson is correct that abortions are morally permissible under normal circumstances. After we will compare Thomson with Warren to prove that even though Thomson supports that abortions are permissible under normal circumstances that abortions are not permissible under all circumstances. When we compare Thomson and Marquis we will look at Thomson’s Violinist case. Marquis supports that abortions are not morally permissible under normal circumstances. Marquis believes that abortions are only morally permissible in hard cases, such as when the mother’s life depends on it. Marquis takes us down a different road, not whether or not the fetus has a right but the morality of killing and asking the question when is it morally permissible to deprive someone of their future. Marquis develops this FLO account which stands for future like ours. He will argue that the fetus is an entity and has a future of value like ours therefore it is wrong to kill that entity. Since having an abortion is killing an entity that has a future value than it is wrong to kill that entity. Marquis’ FLO argument is stated as; if Flo then it is wrong to kill an entity with a future of value and abortion is the killing of an entity with a future value. Therefore FLO and abortion is wrong.
(1) It is morally wrong except in extreme circumstances to cause anything the loss of a valuable future.
(2) Abortion causes a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Don Marquis believed that abortion was impermissible. He wrote a paper titled Why Abortion is Immoral which he argues about how abortion is seriously immoral and is in the same category as killing an innocent adult human being. Marquis’s arguments are the opposite of what it is that I am arguing. Marquis believes that a fetus is a person, so a fetus has a right to life. He believes that unless it is extreme circumstances it is immoral to kill a normal adult human because it causes “the loss to the victim of the value of its future” (Marquis, 192) and this is the equivalent to what happens when someone has an abortion.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but, whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also, each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse, she is not inviting the fetus to live inside her body. This is why birth control and other contraceptives are not a sure deal when dealing with sexual intercourse. What if the birth control method fails and the women end's up getting pregnant? She did…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomson made her assumptions very clear through the different situations she gave to when abortion can be justified. She proves the moral permissibility to abort a fetus in three different scenarios and gave reasons to why abortion is never immoral. Under certain circumstances, despite all situation not being unjust, many still question the ethical principles behind abortion. Although everyone is given the 'right to life', morally it would be unaccepted to force others to carry on a life they do not want in their body. For example, going back to the violinist. If the innocent person is forced to help safe the violinist, it goes against her autonomy and one moral principle should not outweigh…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this argument, right to life is closely connected with the future- a future like ours concept. We might be tempted to ask what is so unique about our future?! What does the future hold for us?! Our future consists of unique experiences- either good or bad, different activities, pleasures and accumulation of knowledge and etc. All of these experiences have value to us. Sometimes we might not value things that are going to happen in our future because we might think that our future is unknown. For Marquis, the future has value independent of whether or not it is recognized by the person or the fetus. For instance, a suicidal teenager might not see any value to her future but Marquis would maintain that her future has value. Having a future like ours alone is enough of a reason for Marquis to put human fetus under the umbrella of morality, which in this case is, in fact, connected to the issue of killing or aborting the embryo. He is approaching the morality of abortion from the future like ours perspective but not from genealogical or biological factors about the embryo. So a being can have a future like ours but not be a person. For instance, we can also apply this concept to a newborn baby or a toddler. A newborn baby or a toddler doesn’t have the conceptual capacity of an adult human but he/she has a future like ours. So Marquis holds that one can have a future like ours even…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis believes that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). His argument is that “it is wrong to kill us because such killing deprives us of all the value of our futures” (525). He also argues that fetuses are close enough to being like us and that is it just as wrong to kill them as it is to kill us. The conclusion of his argument is that not all abortions are wrong since there may be other conditions in some cases such as “abortion before implantation, when the life of the woman is threatened by a pregnancy or abortion and abortion after rape”…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Research Paper

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper will state the medical definition of abortion. Summarize the famous court case Roe vs. Wade and the impact that had on The United States. This paper will also discuss the present abortion debate, the states that have chosen to ban abortion, and the affect this will have on individuals. The last part of the paper will be my opinion on the current abortion ban.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Violin Analysis

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To emphasise McQueen’s point about the racism, he used the idea of recurring motifs to further illustrate his point. The recurring motif of the violin symbolises Solomon’s passion and hobby, and of what he should be doing with his life. In the film, there is a mid-shot of posh men and women dancing to the music created by the violin that Solomon is playing, to symbolise the happiness and joy in the Northern state of America, where equality is present as blacks and whites lived in harmony and with equal opportunities. Retrospectively, in the past, the Northern parts of United States had a slave-free environment where all are treated equally during the 1840s. The pure talent that Solomon possess is regarded as being very fine, proved by the dialogue, “These two gentlemen were enquiring…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis stated in his writing “Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. Clearly, it is not wrong to end the life of some arbitrarily chosen single human cell. Fetuses seem to be like arbitrarily chosen human cells in some respects and like adult humans in other respects.” (Wolff pg. 361). Marquis thus suggest that a proper contention for an anti-abortionist (Value of the future account) must be founded on the theory that if someone is not afforded the ‘opportunity’ to experience certain gains or projects due to the negligence/actions of others then whomever is responsible for the loss of that person’s life is in fact morally…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202. Print. This journal is written by a philospher by the name of Don Marquis. While this document is quit outdated it still plays an important role in today 's debate about abortion. It is used by pro-life activists when debating the reasons why they feel abortion is immoral. This journal is long and filled with great ideas to ponder about life, its meaning and signifigance to the world. Marquis has etched his name with this written journal in the never ending debate of wether abortion is right or wrong. I think this piece will be valuable to my essay in that it will give my audience a deeper perception than the current idea that abortion should be a womens choice.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marquis On Abortion

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’s argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. Abortion is defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, which is most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. (dictionary.com) Furthermore I do agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, however I do believe that in some cases it is permissible, for instance choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Ethics Paper

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. Thesis: Abortion is a highly controversial topic in America. The act of disregarding a human life and terminating a pregnancy should only be performed on women who have been victims of rape, incest, or failed contraception. Instances where the pregnancy is terminated because the child threatens the health and well being of the female should also be a valid reason for an abortion to be performed. Other than those circumstances listed, the fetus should have the right to develop and have a life of its own.…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, Why Abortion is Immoral, Don Marquis argues that abortion is seriously morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases (2012). The exceptions Marquis makes for when abortion is permissible include, in instances of rape, when the pregnancy could threaten the woman’s life, when the fetus is anencephalic, and during the first fourteen days after conception (2012). In his argument, Marquis attempts to bypass the traditional abortion debate which has largely focused on whether or not the fetus is a person (2012). By explaining why killing in general is wrong, Marquis will seek to prove that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult because it robs them of their future (2012).…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion is the deliberate killing of the weakest and most defenseless among us. Unfortunately, for the last few decades, the practice has been recognized as a fundamental human right by the highest court of the land. Many people are fervent supporters of abortion. Their reasons for support are varied. These readings include excerpts from the majority opinion of Roe v. Wade, as well as articles by two feminists-- Judith Jarvis Thomson and Serrin M. Foster--on the morality of abortion.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Don Marquis, who argues for the conservative view of abortion, there is an essence in the wrongness of killing (book). However, Marquis does agree that abortion to save a life is necessary. Another similar viewpoint is that of Judith Thomson, who states that a fetus is a person from conception1. However, Thomson focuses on the mother’s decision over her own body. She uses an analogy of forcefully donating an organ in order to keep another person alive in relation to rape pregnancies.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marquis then connects this idea with abortion by saying that aborting a fetus is depriving a being of a valuable future. Regardless of what pro-choice or pro-life views somebody might have, the bottom line is that the fetus has the potential for a valuable future and…

    • 1412 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays