Preview

Violence And Violence In John Middleton's The Anatomy Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violence And Violence In John Middleton's The Anatomy Of War
War; A state of usually open and declared hostile conflict between states or nations - the definition of war defined by The Merriam Webster. Throughout history there has been thousands - if not millions - of wars; fought through both violence and peace. Since 1900 there has been roughly 500 major wars or conflicts; a shockingly-low 19 of the 500 have fought without violence. Despite the common cries of people saying violence is never the answer, violence is ironically the very reason why today (2015) a majority of the world is at peace and citizens are granted rights and freedoms. Since the end of the first World War in 1917, people all over the globe commemorate the 11th of November every year as it marks the signing of the Armistice between Allied forces and Germany. Often ignored however; are all the lives …show more content…
Some see the decision as heroic and a smart move and others see it as the worst war-decision since King Napoleon decided to invade Russia in 1812. Again, no matter which way it is viewed, the decision ended an entire World war ; sparing the lives of millions. John Lyles wisely and famously wrote “All is fair in love and war” in his book The Anatomy of War. Lyles meant that no action or decision can be said to be harsh or cruel during times of war given all the unique scenarios. Unlike person conflict, war does not have a governing body to enforce rules or laws on a Country. However there can be sanctions or Treaties to defer from conflict, like the Treaty of Versailles So, given the extreme circumstances the United States were put under after the attacks on Pearl Harbor, the decision to ultimately drop the second bomb proved to be the right one. Not only did the second bomb bring an end to World War II, it reduced and nearly stopped the spread of fascism throughout
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Public Services Unit 8 P1 P2 M1
    • 1392 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Public Services Unit 8 P1 P2 M1

    War is normally defined as a state of open, often prolonged, armed conflict between two or more groups, usually nations, states or other parties. Wars are usually begun through the clash of interests between the different groups such as territory or resources. Before a war can officially begin the groups involved usually have a formal declaration of war to make the citizens aware that there is a war.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Themes In A Separate Peace By John Knowles
    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War Themes In A Separate Peace By John Knowles

    During Gene’s time at Devon School, World War II was raging in Europe and in other places and as the boys were getting closer to drafting age they feared of going to war and that fear grew much larger and scarier as the boys were getting closer to going to war. The boys that were getting ready to go off for war were treated a little better, for example the boys were allowed to go smoke without any adults saying anything to them. Eventually it got to the point that the war was all that was on anyone’s mind at the time during school especially in the latter part of the book during Gene’s senior year.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb
    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Truman's Decision To Drop Of The Atomic Bomb Justified

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Truman Justified In His Decision To
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was Truman Justified In His Decision To

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Harry Truman Influence The World
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Harry Truman Influence The World

    Army generals and past presidents have all thought of another strategy to try and redo the event in a better way. However, almost any survey that you can find will show you that most citizens supported or were neutral on the fact that the bombs were what was needed to end the war. Due to the situation, we would have been attacked and destroyed even further if we hadn’t ended it there. This proved the US’s dominance to other countries for the rest of time. Our soldiers were easily able to intimidate others with this advantage. Not only being a great leader, he was a great soldier as…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Truman Was Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Truman Was Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    As we look back on this historical event, many would argue if dropping the atomic bomb was the right choice. Strategically and politically, Truman was justified in dropping the bomb, but morally it wasn’t the right decision. America didn’t enter the war until December 7th, 1941, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The US had been trying to stay out, but many knew their entrance…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing World War II And The Atomic Bomb
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing World War II And The Atomic Bomb

    The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki marked the end to the world's largest armed conflict. Many debates have surfaced over the ethics of such an attack. The bomb itself caused massive amounts of casualties while the unknown effects of radiation caused many more deaths amongst the survivors of the blast. Despite the ghastly effects of such a weapon, it offered the best choice for a quick and easy defeat of Japan. President Truman, who authorized the use of the atomic bomb, made a wise decision under the circumstances of the war. The Japanese refusal to surrender, the massive amount of allied casualties involved in invading the Japanese mainland and the ineffectuality of a military blockade enforcing Japan to surrender made the bomb a necessary last resort.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The America's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is The America's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan

    The dropping of the atom bomb on Japan saved American lives. If American soldiers invaded Japan we would have lost even more lives. “More than 55,000 Americans had already died in the Pacific. The bomb prevented more American lives to be lost” (Walker). This shows that so many American lives were already lost, and by dropping the bombs there were many lives that were saved. Because of the bomb dropping, a huge number of American lives were saved. “An invasion of Japan would have resulted in another 500,000 American lives lost” (The Human Cost). This shows that dropping the bomb was a good idea because we didn’t have to invade Japan so we could save lives.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    One reason someone might think we did the wrong thing by dropping the bomb on Japan is that it killed many innocent people, but if we didn’t many more Japanese and American lives could’ve been lost if the war continued. Dropping the bomb caused Japan to lose thousands of innocent lives that could have been prevented. Another reason is that it might not have been the reason that we won the war. We probably would’ve won the war anyway, by dropping the bomb we just won the war faster than we would have if we didn’t. Finally, America just assumed that people would go inside and hide, but they just watched it come down. People thought the bomb was something else so they rushed out to see it come down. In conclusion the government did the right thing dropping the bomb on Japan because it saved millions of Japanese and American lives.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Effects Of Euphues By John Lyly
    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Effects Of Euphues By John Lyly

    John Lyly, in his novel Euphues, once said, “All is fair in love and war.” When it comes to war, anything goes. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified, for there are positive effects, the Japanese were brutal, and it ultimately saved lives. Firstly, there are the positive effects brought on from the bombings.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay
    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hiroshima Bombing Persuasive Essay

    Pearl Harbour was one of the most terrible acts in history. December 7, 1941 Japan bombed a naval base in Hawaii that was called Pearl Harbor. After this incident the U.S. declared decided to declare war on Japan. After a number of years in battle the U.S. was forced to make a major decision to invade Japan or use the atomic bomb. The U.S chose to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan because they wanted to completely end the war with Japan. The U.S. thought this would end the war because it was going to kill a lot of people. There was no point in dropping it because Japan was planning on giving up soon because they were losing. President Harry Truman made the wrong decisions in dropping the bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki because Japan was going to end the war anyways.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Research Paper
    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Research Paper

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was both tragic and unnecessary. This explosion caused over 150,000 civilian deaths. The United States used this bomb as a way to how superiority to Japan and the Soviets, but they took it too far. For one, it was way overfunded. The United States were also uneducated about its full power. When they dropped the bomb, even they were unsure of the full destruction the bomb was capable of. Doing this to innocent civilians that were not even a part of the war gave the United States a bad reputation, and could have been the last-resort option if nothing else worked, instead of the first plan.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More