Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

View of Human Nature

Good Essays
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
View of Human Nature
View Of Human Nature
Humans are born basically good. It is Karen Horney's view that “people are essentially good” but in my personal opinion, I think that humans are in the borderline of it. Tendencies of them being good or evil or just depends. But if you were to ask me and am only allowed to choose between the two, I think I’ll be siding on that people are basically evil meaning here that I will be contradicting on Karen Horney statement. I’ll be talking about why I think humans are basically evil.
An example is in the Bible about Adam and Eve. The snake had convinced Eve to take and eat the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil which God had forbid them not to take and eat it but eventually Eve gave in even persuading Adam to eat it as well. God was really angry and punished them and their children to suffer. My point in this example is that if people are basically good, they will not take and eat the fruit even if they are being persuaded to do it. They were basically evil because someone had persuaded them to do it and somehow this had made the evil inside them become agitated thus them ending up doing it.
Another example here is that every human are being conflicted with emotions and ideas of doing some bad things thus making me think that humans are basically evil. If they are not basically evil, they won’t be thinking of these kind of things nor even do it. Like now in this generation, some people do evil things. People say a result of this is because of their past experiences like growing up in an unhealthy family lifestyle, lack of parental love in Karen Horney’s case “basic evil”. Yes, it is reasonable but still if people are not basically evil even if they are under influences or living under unhealthy family conditions, they won’t be affected and will do right things.
So in my conclusion, I think humans are basically evil. If humans are basically good, they won’t be influenced to do it and will refuse because they know what is right and what is wrong and will choose the right thing coz of them basically being good. I know that ‘good’ and ‘evil’ are very relative terms and there’s no real way of measuring this. Even if we were to agree upon what makes someone good or bad. I think the state of the world says a lot about human nature. There is no doubt we are violent, hateful people. We rarely care about our neighbor, and it has created a rather gloomy global society. But whether that is who we are or just how we sometimes act, is debatable.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In East of Eden it is clearly shown that when given the chance humans will usually pick the evil road; however, when they do so they always justify their actions.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the flies

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With proof from the book Lord of the Flies by William Golding I can say a person’s environment factors into their overall attitude, people naturally have evil thoughts, but will rules around them they are good. At the beginning of the book on page 38 Ralph says “Shut up! What! Listen!”. From the start of the look Ralph has felt power and the slight change of letting go of rules and becoming his natural evil controlling self. Ralph wants to keep order and the only way to keep order is with rules. Rules are what separate a person from doing whatever they want and being a bad person with doing good. From a more easily transitioned to showing evil we see on page 40 “His voice rose to a shriek of terror as jack snatched his glasses off his face.” Jack has no rules therefore he does whatever he wants and acts evil. If he was naturally good he would have felt some slight guilt for taking glasses from someone who can’t see without them. Essentially humans show their true nature given the opportunity that was given in Lord of The flies.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My thesis differs slightly from the one my group created because I did not necessarily agree that only your experiences are what lead you down the path of evil or good it is much deeper than that. Everyone interprets situations differently. If someone has had a bad childhood/past it does not mean that they are going to turn out evil in the end. This theorem is proved in some of the novels we have read over the course of this year. Everyone has different morals and different priorities that shape them and lead them to make certain choices or commit certain actions that others maybe would not have made or done. An example of this is in Macbeth. If I remember correctly I absolutely hated Macbeth the attitude the people in the play portrayed bothered me since they were oblivious, ignorant, and ultimately some just plain evil in the end. Macbeth was one of those…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy of Hsun Tzu

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In order for humans to become good they must resist their original nature. “Therefore there must be the civilizing influence of teachers and laws and guidance of propriety and righteousness… From this point of view, it is clear that the nature of man is evil and that his goodness is the…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is man inherently evil? Many people have different answers to this question some do not believe that there is such a thing as good or evil. What is good and evil? Is evil a part of every human being from the moment he is on this planet? I think that man himself chooses in which direction to go to and the environment influences his or her decisions. Many think that you are not inherently evil or good it is you and the environment that makes you evil or good. William Golding in his book is trying to prove and say through his book that people are evil by nature. If a person does not see, what he has done is wrong or evil than you cannot consider this evil or wrongdoing. Evil is when a person knows that what he is doing is wrong but he wants and does it anyway.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good to Evil

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Making bad decisions is a part of life. No one should ever choose to let bad choices rule their life because this can change an individual from good to evil. Various factors can influence an individual’s personality from good to evil. In the short story “Twins” by Eric Wright and “The Road out of Eden” by Randall Grace, the characters go from good to evil because of their actions and way of thinking. This is why people should think before they act, and the consequences of their actions.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are also myriad examples showing the positivity in human nature. On the contrary, this may be due to taught values in society. One may argue that selfless actions done for other human beings show how humans may be inherently good. An example of an action corresponding to this theme would be an opposing softball team witnessing a girl who stuck a home-run collapse with a knee injury, but instead of leaving her there they brought her around all the bases, sacrificing their victory. The girls on the opposing team say sweet comments such as: “We just wanted to help her (text 4.)” and the girl with the knee injury says how she “would do the same for her in the same situation (text 4.)” One may think that kindness is an inherent property of humans or rather that society just teaches us how helping other human beings is the correct action to take in an event. Without a society to teach man what is morally right, man would want to do what is right for themselves so they can feel satisfied with themselves. Correspondingly, one may argue that “in most cases people will not do things to harm themselves or others (text 2)” therefore proving to be inherently good. Although this may be somewhat true, there is still a lot of violence that is present, even in today’s society. People’s inner evils may be at a chance of increasing due to the others around them acting hostile, therefore reverting their mindsets to their original nature. As explained in Hobbes’ work Leviathan, man “acts morally only when they are sure that others are the same (text 6,)” explaining how morals are put into thought only when others use them. Without the confidence that one is using morals, it is said that humans’ “rational behaviour leads [them] to attack others (text 6,)” which exhibits to how people may not do things to harm others when morals are present, but act more violent when morals are…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good and evil. These are two words that everybody has heard. One question that can arise from these two words is whether humans are essentially good or evil. The question of human nature has been a topic that even the greatest philosophers have struggled with. Even the best people still have evil thoughts which demonstrate that evil exists in all of us, however much that the trait is suppressed. Evil is not a bold line straight down the middle of what is right and this is why it is my opinion that human nature is essentially evil.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You cannot say that man is inherently evil because when a human being is just born all it could do is cry, and excrete the wastes in its body. The human cannot do anything when it is just born a human learns everything except for instinctive actions which it cannot learn. The human is not born evil if you look at it that way but when the baby gets older than three the baby may have an attraction to a parent of the opposite sex and might…

    • 416 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Man Inherently Good

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Is man inherently good or evil? To answer that question we will examine humanity’s past and present acts. We will discuss the causation of man through their natural acts, through wars, conflicts and common acts of violence. We will show that humanity is neither inherently evil nor good. However, we often settle our personal disagreements through common violent acts. Wars are fought because we want to establish our dominance or have some kind of agenda. Briefly mentioned are some common theories suggesting the reasoning behind such wicked behaviors. Also discussed is the examination of each team member’s personal values, which is an idea, accepted by individuals or a group; beliefs are any cognitive content held as true; morals are principles of right and wrong or, conforming to standards of behavior and character based on those principles. These are based in cultural and social constructs which vary from culture to culture. Thomas Hobbes, a 17th century philosopher viewed human beings as naturally egoistic creatures who seek their own welfare, even if this leads to aggression against others. Hobbes argued that people join into society to gain security from others. A century later Jean-Jacques Rousseau disputed Hobbes’ theory, and in 1762 Rousseau wrote humans are natural compassionate loners. But, unlike animals, human behavior is not determined by instinct; human behavior is acquiescent; it changes in the societies within which humans live. Rousseau argues that the violent traits that Hobbes attributes to human nature are actually caused by the type of society in which people live and not essential human nature (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 2007).…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings are born to be evil. They come naturally to the face of violence and brutality, and this belief was held by numerous throughout many a time. One namely is William Golding; the author of the well renowned novel The Lord of the Flies; and he expressed it well in his work. That everyone, if the situation calls for it, has the ability to commit horrific atrocities. And then there are those that made their own beliefs known; that everyone is naturally good until pushed otherwise, which itself was demonstrated by a Jean Jacques Rousseau during the Enlightenment. This argument is otherwise known as nature versus nurture. But that will be investigated later on. For now, the reasons for the instinctual persona of everybody to do bad.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists and psychologists have different opinions regarding this. Some scientists see that people are born evil while others believe that people are naturally good. The Christianity concept of the original sin states that people are born with a normal psychological condition which is the desire for doing bad things. On the other hand, according to Islam, people are born upon Fitra. There is much research in the scientific and psychology fields that support the both opinions. Nevertheless, it seems that there is more convincing evidence for the opinion that says people are born good. “Society corrupted man; however, people were born good at birth”. (Cameron, 2013). Being good is one’s nature before getting influenced by the outside sources. We are all born good. However, we might develop tendencies for being evil depending on the surrounding circumstances. We come pure in this life; nevertheless, we learn how to be bad. Throughout the life, we learn and acquire evil and violence. We learn all the amoral qualities. We learn greed, selfishness, Gossiping, hatred, lie, and stinginess. It is impossible to be born with these qualities. There is no way to carry such genes in our blood. Human being is pure. However, society and environment contaminates us…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are humans inherently good? It is a question many people are puzzled about, and many do not know the answer too. The fact that humans may be born good and slowly turn evil because how corrupt society is, or that they have been born bad and been put in order from lessons and rules in life is completely unknown. It is such a complicated question that there has been no solid proof to whether humans are good or evil. Many studies support that we are all inherently good to begin and those who are evil only do so because they have been created by their own experiences in society or the background they have come from. All men are inherently good to begin with and those who become "evil" have been created by their own life experiences and personal background.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever wondered why your parents teach you manners? Or why they punish your for hitting your sister or biting your brother? Humans must be taught to be good because we are born inherently evil. The definition of evil is being somewhat wicked and immoral. The definition of good is being morally right and having integrity. Now, some people may say that this is a horrible thing to say, but if you think about it, how do all these bad things happen if people aren’t truly bad? Why do we have crime, rape, domestic violence, war, and murder? Not all people do these things and most people believe these are wrong, but there are people who still do it anyway. Humans can be good, if they try; however, humans are born inherently evil.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays