Preview

view of henry clay journal

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
view of henry clay journal
Antonio P
History 11

January 29, 1820

Slaves welcome here, slave not wanted there. Man, it's a tough one trying to achieve what is best. How can everyone be happy if a solution cannot be reach here in Missouri? Across this whole world, there are those states that perhaps love working these black folks night and day. This is not right. I must find a solution to all this! Something must be done, who knows what will people want in the new vast territory we have just acquired. Will the territory allow slavery, or shall it be declared free? Ah yes, perhaps the inhabitants should be allowed to choose for themselves. Yes, this Missouri Compromise can achieve all that is well. I shall present this to Congress, and I hope this will get their support. I believe everyone is equal in one way or another. Now with my fellow Congress members, we must wait to see what happens. It has now been about 8 months, and we finally heard word. We are happy to inform that a solution has been met. We have equaled the power between the North and the South. The Missouri Compromise passed by Congress consists of two parts. Well with Missouri being a slave state now, I am certain that many slaves will now be fleeing away. Sometimes we lose, sometimes we win. At least Maine will be a free state, allowing the welcoming of everyone. Well for sure slavery will be excluded in all the new states that we got from the Louisiana Purchase, North of the Southern boundary of Missouri. Those folks can have a sense of relaxation. This compromise has achieved what it was intended to do. Now our nation will remain united by having an equal balance of states that want slavery, and those that do not. I sometimes wonder if this is only a temporary solution. Will this awaken future leaders to strive for a better tomorrow? I feel that this has prevented any war that might have been planned to erupt. ~ Henry Clay

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr was born on January 17, 1942 in Louisville Kentucky. He was born into a middle class black family. He didn’t have what some would call a rough child hood. He began boxing at the age of twelve. When Cassius was 12 years old, he and a friend went to the Columbia Auditorium to partake in the free hot dogs and popcorn available for visitors of the Louisville Home Show. When the boys were done eating, they went back to get their bicycles only to discover that Cassius’ had been stolen. Furious, he went back into the auditorium to find a police man. He found police officer Joe Martin, a trainer at a Louisville gym. When Muhammad Ali said he wanted to beat up the person who stole his bike, Martin told him that he should…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Clay Frick was born on December 19, 1849, in Western Overton Pennsylvania. Frick was the second child of an immigrant father and a mother that was the daughter of a flour merchant. He grew up with six siblings. He was raised as a Christian. Frick’s grandfather was wealthy because he was a rich miller and whiskey maker. In his early life, he received little formal education. He early showed a talent for business, and at age nineteen he became a bookkeeper for his grandfather’s business (People & Events: Henry Clay Frick (1849-1919) , 2004). At age 20, Frick had formed the company Frick and Company. The company dealt with coke production (a carbon residue that’s used in metalworking). Frick had been buying coal lands in the Connellsville region and constructing coke…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the southern contention to include slaves as part of the representative count is correct and that they should be counted as whole individuals. Given the views and discussions of the time revolving slavery, the south was facing the strong possibility that norther views would have great power in congress, thus threatening southern wealth and way of life. The inclusion of the slave population to protect the interest of the south would give southern suffrage enough voting power to keep the institution in place and maintain the wealth produce by slave labor. Further, since voting is constrained to white males, who most often represent and oversee the business of their households, there can be concession to only levy taxes upon the free populace who have aspirations of wealth and property in exchange for a limitation on how long the slave population can be used as part of representation. I believe the big three states, knowing that the north states were opposed to slavery, slavery abolitionist were demanding more and growing and that the existing…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and Free states. The slaveholding states feared that if they became outnumbered in Congressional representation that they would lack the power to protect their interests in property and trade.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 7

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the Compromise of 1850 was made, the South wasn’t very fond of the idea. “If the agitation goes on, the same force, acting with increased intensity, as has been shown, will finally snap every cord, when nothing will be left to bind the States together except force.” (Document A) This shows the North’s control of the government and constant pressure on the South for their beliefs. Also it shows that if nothing is done to relieve the constantly growing pressure on the country, that it will fall apart. If the North continues to fail to form some sort of measures to please the South, the Union will not stay together. The North was also not happy with a lot of the compromises that were made and benefitted the South. One of these was the Fugitive Slave Law. They believed that the law was immoral and shouldn’t be followed. The North believe the law was “suicidal,” and that “the Union is at an end as soon as an immoral law is enacted.” (Document B) They thought that if this law were to be effective it would destroy the Union. There was very much discontentment within the states. So much that at one point, a man was beaten unconscious with a cane after delivering a speech to the House. (Document F) The people of the South did not agree with the North on many…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution of California outraged many southerners because the constitution banned the slavery. Henry Clay worked to make a compromise that would both satisfy the South and the North. With the support of Daniel Webster, a powerful senator of Massachusetts, Henry Clay presented to the Senate a series of resolutions later called The Compromise of 1850. In order to appease North, the compromise regulated that California be admitted to the Union as a free state. To please the South, the compromise proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law. To appease both sides, there was a provision allowed the right to vote for or against slavery called popular sovereignty. Even though Henry Clay put great effort on the compromise, the…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pre-Civil War Apush

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the 1850s, the North and South could not agree on anything and were in constant disagreements. In 1850, Henry Clay created the Compromise of 1850. In the compromise, it was said that California would be admitted as a free state which created a stir in the South since it would mean that the amount of Free states and slave states would be unbalanced (Shown in Document B). The North would now have power of the Senate and superiority over the South. The country would give Texas ten million dollars if they gave up claims to Mexico. This would take away a large piece of territory for a relatively low sum. There would be abolition of slave trade in Washington D.C., but not slavery. This meant that emancipation of slavery in the nation’s capital was starting. Also, Mexico and Utah’s slave status rested on popular sovereignty which leaned toward Free State status due to the incompatibility of the plantation system with the environment. Then, there would be a Fugitive Slave Law put in to place which would compel local officials to capture and return runaway slaves along with denying them jury trials, which some congressmen were against (Document F). Daniel Webster also delivered the Seventh of March speech backing this compromise up as everyone else did not like the idea and explained why he thought it was necessary (Document A). This caused the South distress…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These failed compromises served purposes other than their intended ones. They served to “feed the extremist factions” in each of the divided sections of America. The deterioration of these compromises aided the progression of groups like the Radical Republicans, Know- Nothings, Free-Soil Party, and Abolitionists. One of the compromises that served to feed these factions was the Missouri Compromise. As stated before, this compromise debated on the admission Maine and Missouri as slave or free states. It resulted in the 36°30’ line being set and is an example of an almost direct conflict between the North and the South on the institution. The North was against the spread of slavery so even though they conceded Missouri they were able to contain…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise of 1850

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Personally, I feel that the Compromise of 1850 was a success. Clay and his other men were very fair about every decision made. Even though I wish there was no such thing as slavery, I believe that having an even number of slave states and free states was smart. However, because there would be laws against slaves to cross over the free-state line, then there should also be laws set to slave owners that could…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By electing me as president, the people chose for power to be exercised with principle. The Senator is right in one assertion, that I do wish to reunite the North and the South, but not at the sacrifice of social change. However, one must understand social change cannot be forced upon the South like it is some conquered foreign nation; such oppression was after all, the very reason they seceded in the first place and by humiliating them as Mr. Sumner so desires, will only birth another horrid…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now that the sure wind of war within our country has prevailed we must continue to rebuild upon the accomplishments of the Grant Administration. We must rebuild within our trust with other human beings and rebuild within the large battered roads of this nation. Though much has been done in the last presidency, there is still ton more to accomplish. Likewise the efforts of before have helped me gain a foot on the task to better our united nation. Looking back the last few years, already have we recovered from the tribulation of Civil War. We have started the healing process between the different races that were pitted against each other but now stand as brothers. The recent Civil Rights Acts and the passing of the 15th Amendment have helped to guarantee and ensure the equal Civil Rights that all men will share and all able to be comprised under the glorious Constitution. Yet throughout the years we have also placed ourselves in the continued process of reconstruction in which we have rid the terrors of extremists groups but also have accomplished the first steps of reunion with the Southern states. Likewise, these efforts to heal the previous tension have been done to almost a full recovery. Many former rebels have been pardoned and now the first steps to a unified country have put under way by the removal of many federal soldiers. The vanquishing of the post war tensions has been successful but now we must continue and move…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What the southern states want also goes against the ideas that our founding fathers built this great country. Although i can see where their point view is coming from about the rights of the states, but this problem of social segregation needs to be fixed nation wide not just in certain states, therefore the federal government should intervene with the states. The federal government solving an issue through the Supreme Court for the whole nation is the best way to solve problems. The United States was built off liberty, freedom, rights, and equality, and what the southern states want is going against the idea of equality. Although segregation wasn’t just present in schools but also in other public places, this small step to unifying races in schools was beginning of the end of segregation and beginning of equality amongst everyone. This conflict really was the beginning of desegregation and equality. After this conflict many riots broke out, protests, the Rosa Parks incident, civil right movements,etc. Another reason why this segregation thing in the US was wrong, was because World War 2 had just ended and one main thing the US was fighting against Germany was RACISM! The US was fighting racism in Germany, for the Jews. Racism wasn’t the only thing the US was fighting against in Europe, but it did play an important role. The US fought against racism and equality, but in our own country at the time was full of racism and equality, which showed that the US was just being a hypocrite. Also many african americans fought in the wara and all of them realized what was going on back home, and it wasn’t right and something needed to change. Although the southern states did make some great points, but everything they believed in was wrong, therefore i believe what the Congress was doing at the time was the right thing to…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a bad solution, because it did not solve the slave problem but it was also a good compromise because it lasted for several years and temporarily solved the conflict of whether or not the new states would be slave states or free states. Perhaps the more important aspect of the Missouri Compromise was the agreement that no territory to the north of Missouri’s southern border could enter the Union as a slave state. That part of the compromise effectively stopped slavery from spreading into the rest of the Louisiana Purchase. The Missouri Compromise, as the first great Congressional compromise over the slavery issue, was also important as it set a precedent that Congress could regulate slavery in new territories and states. While the Missouri Compromise seemed to settle an issue at the time, its full impact still lay years in the future. The issue of slavery was far from settled, and further compromises and Supreme Court decisions would play a role in the great debates over it. This was meant to settle the question of slavery in the Western territories that were applying to become states of the Union. It was agreed to draw one line of latitude, north of which slavery would be illegal. The line was the Southern border of Missouri. The compromise was made to make everyone happy, it wasn’t really about the slaves but about power. There were 11 slave and 11 free states and one more state was coming into play. If the state became a slave state then the South would have had more power in the House of Representatives, than the North. If the state became a free state then the South would be weak in the House of Representatives. No one in the government or in the North wanted the South to have more power because they were afraid the country would become a slave nation and they didn’t want that. The only way to make everyone happy was the Missouri Compromise, but it was not an ideal way to settle the dispute over the expansion of slavery in the…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Slippery Slope

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As with all great conflicts in history, it was not one factor but rather a multitude of issues that led to the breakdown of compromise during the 19th century and eventually to the Civil War. The government of the period was entirely content to sweep the issue of slavery under the rug, contrasting sharply with the strongly polar feelings of the nation, with the South wanting to expand the ‘peculiar institution’ and the North beginning to see it as a moral dilemma. The combination of these contradictory views set the stage for purely sectional political parties, the development of which precluded any further hope of peacefully settling the issue. As the federal government became increasingly complacent in its handling of slavery and the North became decreasingly tolerant of the institution, the nation split along party lines and eliminated any hope of reconciliation.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Amendments

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For four long years, a war raged on, a war being fought for the freedom of slaves. These men and women were held in bondage and seen as property by their owners. Brothers fought against brothers, to preserve the union, but also for the rights of African- Americans held in slavery. The war’s end brought a victory for the Union and freedom for the slaves. With Lincoln’s influence, constitutional amendments were ratified that provided the newly freed slaves with the right to vote and US citizenship. These amendments will provide a foundation for all civil rights for all Americans in years to come.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays