Vietnam War Dbq
The United States strategy in Vietnam from 1965 to 1968 went through various changes and revisions as leadership tried to find a feasible plan of action. US Army General William Westmoreland and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara were two of the major forces in US leadership that would shape the war effort. They devised a military strategy of attrition through tactics of search and destroy, covert operations, and other factors in hopes of wearing out the enemy. While their strategy found some success on the battlefields, the ineffectiveness of search and destroy missions, the over emphasis on body counts, and the disconnect between everyday soldiers and their superiors about defining success would doom the US war effort.
Argument
In the …show more content…
This desire for body count was part of Westmoreland’s plan to reach a cross-over point in which enemy forces were being killed faster they could be replenished. He believed that the US could out produce and out supply North Vietnam, and he was ready to attrit and rack up casualties until they fell. This focus on body counts as a measure of progress and success was an additional failure of US military policy. Unit commanders and captains were given kill quotas for their units, and if they did not meet the quotas they were replaced. This immense pressure to produce would lead to indiscriminate killings and atrocities, sometimes even “encourage soldiers to continue the violence.” The My Lai massacre was just one example of platoons wiping out entire villages of people and writing them up as Viet Cong killed in action to drive up the body count. This practice was widespread in the villages of Vietnam and grew even larger as the US begin to set up their own counter guerrilla teams and task forces which would be responsible for most of the massacres in the villages. The obsession with body counts and kill ratios as a measure of success lead to a shoot first, ask questions later mentality from many soldiers, most of whom were taught that everybody they meet is a potential “VC sympathizer” and could be a …show more content…
The soldiers were simply told to wander around the country looking for the enemy, and when the find him, try to take him out. Once the soldiers won the battle or skirmish and gained the territory, they could not feel any source of pride as they were quickly transported by helicopter out of the newly gained territory to go search for the enemy again. This life for the every day soldier made it seem like no tangible progress was being made, and the promise of success from the generals appeared more and more empty. Enemy casualties were being over estimated, and despite the still massive enemy casualties, 75% of all fighting was engaged by the Viet Cong as this “war of pin pricks” was beginning to takes it toll. The unclear mission and lack of leadership communication would lead to a severe drop in soldier morale and was another significant failure of the US military
Argument
In the …show more content…
This desire for body count was part of Westmoreland’s plan to reach a cross-over point in which enemy forces were being killed faster they could be replenished. He believed that the US could out produce and out supply North Vietnam, and he was ready to attrit and rack up casualties until they fell. This focus on body counts as a measure of progress and success was an additional failure of US military policy. Unit commanders and captains were given kill quotas for their units, and if they did not meet the quotas they were replaced. This immense pressure to produce would lead to indiscriminate killings and atrocities, sometimes even “encourage soldiers to continue the violence.” The My Lai massacre was just one example of platoons wiping out entire villages of people and writing them up as Viet Cong killed in action to drive up the body count. This practice was widespread in the villages of Vietnam and grew even larger as the US begin to set up their own counter guerrilla teams and task forces which would be responsible for most of the massacres in the villages. The obsession with body counts and kill ratios as a measure of success lead to a shoot first, ask questions later mentality from many soldiers, most of whom were taught that everybody they meet is a potential “VC sympathizer” and could be a …show more content…
The soldiers were simply told to wander around the country looking for the enemy, and when the find him, try to take him out. Once the soldiers won the battle or skirmish and gained the territory, they could not feel any source of pride as they were quickly transported by helicopter out of the newly gained territory to go search for the enemy again. This life for the every day soldier made it seem like no tangible progress was being made, and the promise of success from the generals appeared more and more empty. Enemy casualties were being over estimated, and despite the still massive enemy casualties, 75% of all fighting was engaged by the Viet Cong as this “war of pin pricks” was beginning to takes it toll. The unclear mission and lack of leadership communication would lead to a severe drop in soldier morale and was another significant failure of the US military