Preview

Victory of the North

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Victory of the North
22 March 2013
Victory of the North
There are many causes that led to the victory of the North, as well as many effects that follow their victory. Three important causes that led to the victory of the North are economic growth, secession, and the election of President Abraham Lincoln. Three important effects that followed the victory of the Northern States in the American Civil War are emancipation, a new financial system, and political freedom.
The Civil War of America has been discussed as the first modern war of the new industrial age. Army’s of such a large size had yet to meet head on, face to face in the battle field with weapons of such mass destruction and deadly force. America had not yet seen casualties of this magnitude to date. The Civil War of America started out as army against army, Northern states against Southern states. Which led to disagreements, therefore turning society against society, in which there was no distinction between military enemies and civilian enemies. It was all against all. In this kind of war, political leadership being effective, as well as the ability to mobilize all economic resources, and society’s commitment to fight for what they believed in, know matter how harsh the obstacle. This pledge of allegiance was necessity in the success or failure of the fights to come, on the battle field.
The first cause leading to the victory of the North is economic growth. There was a huge explosion of economic growth to the northern states after the railroad system expansion of the Illinois Central Railroad was finished and made operable. In the Eighteen fifties, the new line of Illinois was the most important, there were parts of the Old Northwest’s commercial agriculture and settlements that were not easily accessible in the past, Illinois Central fixed that problem, which led to a vast growth in population. The newly constructed railroads were able to link the eastern cities with to the commercial trades of western

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the south it was nearly impossible to win the war . The north had many advantageson the south, which created a large difference in the outcome of the Civil War. The North had a bigger population, better leadership, and Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was a leader of the union, and led them to many great victories with his decision making on generals to lead the Union. The north had many plans to shut down the south, though they often took longer than what was expected of them, so many of them were stopped by generals or were figured out by the south.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War DBQ Essay

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” This statement that created by President Abraham Lincoln demonstrates the necessity of the Civil War. If the United States were to remain divided, the strength of these two nations would be degraded and allow the continuation of an immoral practice; slavery. “Politicians, business leaders, newspaper editors, and others desperately sought a last-ditch compromise that would keep other states from following South Carolina...no compromise on Earth could reverse the election of Abraham Lincoln and the Southern fears of a “Black Republican” administration” (Roberts 50). As various groups split within the nation, the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Union had a much more developed and strong government and various technological advantages over the Confederacy. For example, the North had over triple the amount of factories that the South had, six times the workers in those factories, and over double the railroad mileage compared to the South (Source 5). Contextually, these advantages in manpower and technology in the North were long term consequences of the North taking advantage of advancements in technology and having a solidified government in comparison to the South, which stuck with a plantation model based on growing cotton and had little to no government after their secession from the Union. The North’s dominance over technology and manpower gave them a more stable base of resources going into the war than the South, which basically only had cotton and not enough food or manpower. The Union’s use of their technological power gave them the ability to win battles by a landslide and leave cities as large as Atlanta, Georgia completely leveled in the wake of military advancements such as General Sherman’s March to the Sea (Source 7). The photo of the destruction left by the Union army shows the capability of the technology that they possessed in comparison to the Confederacy, and how organized the Union army was because of their strong leadership. Contrastingly, Confederate leadership was…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ideologies that drove citizens to combat in the Civil War varied dramatically between Northern and Southern soldiers. Many soldiers who enlisted in the Federal Army of the North did so as to preserve the young nation, which had less than a century ago, gained its independence from England. The idea of “freeing the slaves” was a very small concern in the minds…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    North, agriculture boomed in the West. The federal government had given plenty of land to…

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killer Angels

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages

    During the Civil War, there were two sides, the Confederate Army and the Union Army. While the Confederates fought for slavery, the Union fought for their freedom. While the Confederates fought for the continuance of state’s rights, the Union fought, the Union fought for what its name stood for, preserving the Union.While one side seemed to be more religious, the other seemed to remain rather independent .…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, The war was based on age-old prejudice and extremism. The South used to think of the North as money-grabbing "yellow bellies" while the Northerners thought of the south as hillbillies and oppressors of the weak and disadvantaged, namely the blacks. The South did a lot of things that severely angered the North. One such thing was the Fugitive Slave Act. This Act made it possible for representatives of slave owners to capture back slave and prosecute anyone that had helped the slaves. Many Northerners were abolitionists and this made them angry as they themselves had helped many slaves escape through the Underground Railroad. Another issue that angered the North was the Brooks vs. Sumner clash. This event could have largely been avoided if Brooks had kept a cooler head. But this event drew a large number of Republican votes, which in turn would help jump-start the civil war.…

    • 920 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several factors played in to the American Civil War that made it have the outcome that it did. Although the South had better trained officials due to their military school, the North was far more advanced than they. The North had the advantage over the South in several ways. However, the outcome of the Civil War was not inevitable: it was determined as much by human decisions and human willpower as by physical resources, although the North's resources gave them an edge over the South.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the War

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The first contributing factor to the South’s loss of the war is the fact that the North had a fundamentally sturdier and superior economy. Economically, the Civil War was not a contest between equals. The South had no factories to produce guns or ammunition, and its railroads were small and not interconnected, meaning that it was hard for the South to move food, weapons, and men quickly over long distances. In addition, though agriculture thrived in the South, planters focused on cash crops like tobacco and cotton and did not produce enough food crops to feed the southern population (“Economy” 2004). The North, on the other hand, had enough food and enough factories to make weapons for all of its soldiers. It also had an extensive rail network that could transport men and weapons rapidly and…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the waning battles, and the slow, contentious process of reconstructing the Union and the readmission of the Confederate States, the American Civil War has filled more pages of scholarly discourse than any other event in U.S. history (1). Amongst the endless topics to which these volumes are devoted, no topic is more debated, chronicled and studied than the various causes that lead to the bloodiest conflict in American history, and its effects on this country’s future. As the 19th century rapidly progressed toward internal conflict in the recently-formed United States of America, it’s physical, economic, and military growth created continuous need for its leaders to build its structure through the tools provided by the Constitution. “Manifest Destiny”, as John O’Sullivan described it, was realized as America’s borders stretched to the Pacific. Population rose exponentially and continued West forcing leadership and legislation to work to maintain democracy, quickly putting a spotlight on the cleavages that had been slowly dividing the nation’s allegiances into Northern or Southern. Many of these cleavages, such as different economic, social and political ideologies, were indirectly born from factors inherent to two distinct regions of the nation. Others, such as the Southern defense and reliance on slavery, and its radical, separatist threats of secession, that directly caused passionate divisions and often-violent results. Ultimately, it was the South’s active pursuits of these direct causes of the Civil War, as well as its use of those indirect cleavages to further separate themselves from the North, that lead a nation of united states to be split in…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    meant to build up the South by helping slaves become free and give them citizenship,…

    • 356 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The American antebellum South, though steeped in pride and raised in military tradition, was to be no match for the burgeoning superiority of the rapidly developing North in the coming Civil War. The lack of emphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, stemming from the Southern desire to preserve their traditional agrarian society, surrendered to the North their ability to function independently, much less to wage war. It was neither Northern troops nor generals that won the Civil War, rather Northern guns and industry. From the onset of war, the Union had obvious advantages.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enthused with patriotic sentiments, civilians who chose fighting for the preservation of the Union, or perhaps to punish the rebellious South, craved the “glory” of battle. Even as the numerous state militias proudly wore gaudy, impractical uniforms and excitedly waited for the fighting, the few seasoned generals they had, attempted to whip them into a functioning army. This was not an easy task, seeing as the would-be soldiers consistently undermined any and every authority figure by ignoring orders, asking for reasons to obey, and breaking rank whenever the felt the urge. Not to mention that the number of commanders who knew how to turn civilians into warriors was dreadfully low. None of these men had a clue what was in store for them, in what would be a much longer and bloodier war than they expected. Through the excited eyes of young volunteers, the war looked to them like a “great adventure,” and those who were not be accepted went home with hanging heads.1 Men saw the Civil War as a chance to defend “The land of my childhood my love and my tears; the land of my birth and my early sunny years.”2 The sword had been drawn, and the men of the Union army gave off an aura of “passion” for the…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays