Preview

Velleman Arguments For Euthanasia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Velleman Arguments For Euthanasia
Velleman’s argument that there should not be a public policy that allows euthanasia. Also, that settling on the decision of voluntary active euthanasia be accessible to the general population can make them worse off even regardless of the possibility that they pick the choice that is best for them. The capacity to settle a decision makes one worse off than going with the default alternative. Even though Vellenman brings up some good points, individuals as of now have the choice to deny life-managing treatment and there is no confirmation of unsafe impacts. If the patients agree to take the euthanasia, him or her will no longer be suffering in pain. With doctor help, patients have a superior shot of encountering an effortless and less traumatic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The beneficial consequences that may result from the legalization of euthanasia as proposed by brock are the following:…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, “A Right of Self-Termination?” J. David Velleman asserts that one should not end their life to make it better, since value should be placed in life itself and not how well it is actually going. The act of suicide involves the intentional termination of ones’ life, for the sole purpose of making life better on the whole. Vellemans’ argument in denying the right to end one’s life includes that: 1. One should value their life over how well their life is actually going.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Velleman poses an interesting point in saying that “having an option can be harmful even if we do not exercise it and – more surprisingly – if we exercise it and gain by doing so.” (83) It seems that Velleman is bringing up the perceived detrimental psychological effects of the option of euthanasia on a patient. Velleman argues that once a patient is given a choice to live or die, they are forced to be responsible for the choice they make and may be made to justify their decision. Of course it would be in poor taste to ask a terminal patient why they insist on prolonging their suffering, but the internal psychological damage caused by the question could be a heavy burden to bear in someone’s final days. Velleman also brings up the pressure placed on the patient by the family after the question to live or die is posed. A patient’s family could be adamant in keeping the patient alive until the very last moment, or they could try to coerce a patient into euthanasia for financial reasons. In short, Velleman believes that having more options places unneeded pressure on a patient, pressure that can negatively influence decisions made influencing the patient’s…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The study of Bioethics involves the consideration of ethical issues arising from advancements in medicine and/or biology. The study of bioethics helps with determining the proper decision in regard to medical or biological issues. Bioethics is highly influential in academia, where scholars investigate the various scenarios arising from advancements, but is also influential in the applied realms of biology and medicine. Albert Jonsen, in his book Bioethics, claims "This field has established itself as an integral part of practical or applied philosophy and as a valuable adjunct to health policy and medical practice" (Jonsen 4). When dealing with the human body, ethics must be considered in order to preserve the value of human life. A highly…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.” Nelson Mandela. What are human rights? The right to life, the right to our bodies? Do we have a right to control how we die? Assisted suicide or euthanasia is medically receiving help to end one's life and it is legal in five states. Despite being a highly debated issue there has yet to be a consensus on the ethics of performing euthanasia. While those in favor of euthanasia say that people have the right to end their suffering on their own terms and the legalization will permit much needed regulations to protect the patient from abuse; those against assisted suicide argue that the practice contradicts…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia, “also called mercy killing. The act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die,as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from incurable ,especially painful,disease or condition.” (Dictionary) . Physician assisted suicide is a personal choice patients in great pain chose to find relief. By law in most places of the world, it is illegal for a doctor to take part in helping someone end their own life. A doctor or physician can go to jail for many years or possibly even for life for doing what their jobs are supposed to be dedicated to - helping people. It should be common sense to realize it is one’s own civil right to decide what to do with his or her own body, life, and fate. If a person would…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, assisted suicide has become a rather controversial topic regarding whether or not a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. While some are against it due to moral beliefs, others support it as a result of their respect for those suffering. However, physicians remain divided on the issue, being torn on the difference between relief from dying and murder. After analyzing the issue in depth, it is clear that terminally ill patients should be granted the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce financial burdens placed upon their families, and preserve the right of individuals to determine their own fate when facing death.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will discuss the topic of euthanasia which according to the NHS is “the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering.” The arguments from both sides are strong and passionate. I believe that people should have the choice to end their own lives if they are suffering from an incurable pain that will slowly kill them. However, this is where the arguments start “what if the person is in a coma and he or she can’t choose to end it?”, “what if he or she is pressured into it” these are valid arguments and there is no question that when it comes to this topic the waters get muddy so to speak. Personally, I believe that it should be within the rights of a person to end their suffering.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of intentionally ending a life through assisted suicide or euthanasia is a controversial topic. There are many moral, practical, and religious arguments either for or against these acts, making it difficult to find any easy answers to these issues. There are a variety of perspectives on euthanasia and assisted suicide that have developed and have been put into policies in some states or countries. This paper will explore what is meant by euthanasia and assisted suicide, some of the arguments for and against intentionally ending a life, and my own values and beliefs surrounding these issues.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Topics regarding taking the decision to deprive yourself or someone else’s life have always caused controversy, regardless of the religion, race or political parties; assisted suicide and euthanasia are not exception for this statement. Assisted suicide occurs when a physician gives all the pertinent information and mechanisms to the patient, giving him the needs tools to end his own life. In the other hand, euthanasia is when you terminate the life of a person who suffers from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, with the patient’s request. Nevertheless, there are other cases where some people want their life to be ended even if they do not have a incurable illness. Euthanasia can be either by taking actions, or by not doing what is necessary to maintain someone alive. “We question whether it is medicine 's role to give patients control over the timing and manner of death.” (Snyder)…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays