Preview

veil of ignorance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1376 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
veil of ignorance
Those people who are ignorant of themselves are able to design a society with equalities in wealth, power and liberty amongst its members (Rawls, 1971; Freeman, 2012). This is the general claim made by john Rawls (1971) in his ‘veil of ignorance’ method within the idea of ‘justice as fairness’. The veil has two factors that contribute to its’ success. Firstly, that a party/person has no knowledge of themselves including (but not limited to) class, wealth, race, gender, age and intelligence. Second, that knowledge is enough so you are able to form a standard of justice in which free and rational people accept a position of equality to defend the association. A criticism to Rawls’ theory on the veil of ignorance is it is not a universal theory. It only applies to those who are capable to rational thoughts, which do not include children, those with special needs and non-humans. In reply to the criticism, the second contribution to the Rawls theory is the parties’ restricted knowledge (class, intelligence, age, race etc.) means all people would be classes as a rational being (Rawls, 1971). The concept of justice presented by Rawls in 1971 within the original position was designed to reflect those social contract theories of Locke, Kant and Rousseau with the focus on the idea of the principles of justice as the basic structure for society. He assumes that free and rational people would accept a fairness agreement if all parties were initially found as equal (Freeman, 2012; Rawls, 1971). This ‘justice as fairness’ sees each person to decide what constitutes their good just a party is to decide what they will find to be just and unjust, all through rational reflection. Once the conception of justice is formed the constitutional and legislative laws are to be chosen. Essentially it is the formation of a just society by rational people through rational thinking. The two principals towards justice are firstly: everyone is entitled to equal rights and basic liberty,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper aims to compare the ideas of equal opportunities and sports equity with regard to sport in Britain. Within this structure, there will be particular emphasis on the theoretical approaches that are used to look at equality in British sport. A key part of this comparison is the study of (social) equality; this includes formal, radical and liberal interpretations of equality. The arguments and suggestions will be reinforced and supported by literature and other texts outside of just the sporting context.…

    • 2881 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Veil of Ignorance, Rawls asks us to imagine what rules we would want to exist in the world, assuming that we do not know what kind of life we would have in the world. For example, it assumes that we do not know how we will look like, how much money will we have, or what sexual orientation will we have. In this position, Rawls states that the rationally self-interested person will ask themselves, “what if I were in the position of society’s least advantaged?…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (MacKinnon p. 291) In order for this idea to work the people involved would have to be free from bias, in other words they must not be able to tip the scales in their favor by knowing their positions in life. Rawls points out that people consider liberty to be particularly important and would therefore choose a society that supported equal rights. However wealth is not as important and therefore it is easier to accept inequality in wealth so long as ones basic needs are met. Rawls believes that people would choose the society that better serves the poorest citizens and provides them with equal opportunity to obtain…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the moment of publication of “A Theory of Justice” in 1971, John Rawls is considered having worked out a thorough theory of social justice with his “justice as fairness” principle. In his work, Rawls presents two basic principles of justice that he considers to be the foundation of our society. The first principle states that everyone has the same exact rights and freedoms as anyone else. The term…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls Summary

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rawls first begins with discussing how we are lead to the original position. The original position is a hypothetical argument that considers a society where people do not decide what is right or wrong based on a higher power or emotion, but rather on common sense. These ideas establish justice or fairness simply based on the community’s beliefs that they create. However, these agreements cannot be made without the “veil of ignorance.” This means that all instances that would create a distortion of views must be ruled out. Thus, the people discussing what the rules will be cannot have any information about the other individual, or the society’s position. The hypothetical argument is contingent on all things being fair and equal, which means that all people involved in crating the beliefs must be free of any preconceived ideas. Another part of the equality of this situation is that every member of a society, including the minority, must be treated fairly. Rawls stated that every citizen had basic liberties and human rights that must be protected. He believed that societies need to protect the least advantaged citizen in order to be successful. We determine which citizens are least advantaged based on if they possess primary goods. Primary goods are what is needed to be a functioning and contributing member of society. These things are not necessarily monetary, but rather on psychological capabilities, historical facts, social capabilities, as well as, moral abilities being free and equal. Rawls believe that the five most important primary goods that determine advantage are basic rights and liberties, freedom to choose, responsibility, income and self respect. These things can make this hypothetical a reality and a society fair as equals.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls, using Kantian rationality, discusses ways to determine principles of social justice. He begins by making a clear distinction as to what defines the social justice used in his argument – “the way in which the major social institutions distribute fundamental rights and duties and determine the division of advantages from social cooperation”. Rawls then continues to introduce concepts such as the original position which pertains to the thought experiment he calls the veil of ignorance – the original position is a hypothetical state where members of society decide what the principles of justice are. To find the original position, the members must use the veil of ignorance in the sense of having ignorance toward class, intelligence, strength, and things alike, in order to prevent bias and in turn create a fair choice. With this in mind, Rawls sets forth to disprove utilitarianism within justice. He claims that utilitarianism is unjust for it does not respect the rights and liberties of all individuals - if slavery was beneficial to the majority, using utilitarianism logic, some would claim it is just. Rawls argues for the equality of rights; inequalities are justified only if they benefit the society as a whole. He makes a key distinction between the benefit of the majority, and the advantage of all.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Week 3 Justice Theory

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rawls believes the utilitarian view does not place the necessary emphasis on individuals, and though he agrees with many aspects of contractarianism, he wishes to improve beyond the classic versions of the social contract (Jurik, 2016, p. 7). Consequently, he endeavors to advance the concept of utilitarianism, and marry it with the social contract theory through his inclusions of the “veil of ignorance” perspective and the “difference principle”. Rawls’ terms his overall advancement as, “justice as fairness” (Rawls, 1993, p.48). In his 1993 article, Justice as Fairness, Rawls claims, “justice as fairness, I would now understand as a reasonable, systematic and practicable conception of justice for a constitutional democracy, a conception that offers an alternative to the dominant utilitarianism of our tradition of political thought” (p.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Rawls argues that the principles of justice that govern the basic structure of society are the principles that would be agreed upon in a hypothetical fair bargaining position, which he calls “the original position.” Throughout his writing, Rawls describes the original position and conveys how it would lead to agreement on two principles of justice. The first principle that he describes says that each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all. The second principle requires that social and economic inequalities must exist only if they are to everyone’s advantage and attached to positions that are open to everyone under conditions of fair equality of opportunity.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Veil Of Ignorance

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page

    Define the term "veil of ignorance." The "veil of ignorance" was defined in 1971 by American philosopher John Rawls as political philosophy. The veil of ignorance regards people or groups who do not know the specifics of skills, tastes, and positions individuals will obtain or possess within a social order. For example, for a proposed society in where 50% of the student population does not graduate high school, it proceeds in entering the new school year that there is a 50% chance upcoming society will not complete high…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Veil Of Ignorance

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    The role of the "veil of ignorance” plays in Rawls' theory of distributive justice is by eliminating bias in society making a fair way of choosing principles (Shaw & Barry, 2016). The veil is put in place so individuals from the original position would make a just decision knowing nothing of their self and their natural abilities, or their position in society. In addition the individual would know nothing of their sex, race, nationality, or individual tastes when making a decision (Shaw & Barry, 2016). Therefore, no one is at an advantage or disadvantage when making up principles in society.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rawls, his principles of justice would be at the foundation of an ideal society. He goes on to explain this through a hypothetical situation he calls the “original position”. A person, who finds themselves in this “original position”, can be compared to being a newborn child who just came into the world without knowing anything about themselves, not their abilities, personality, nationality, nor social status. Any person in this “original position” is considered to be acting behind what Rawls’ calls a “veil of ignorance” (Scott, 2003). As they won’t know what their circumstances will be in this society, every person would choose fair principles that will benefit everyone equally. Rawls’ principles of justice consist of two principles, where the first principle states that a person has equal rights to as much liberties as is compatible with the rights of every other person (Scott, 2003). The second principle concerns the fair equality of opportunity, which allows anyone regardless of their background and social status the opportunity and equal right to hold positions in offices that are available to anyone, and the difference principle makes sure that social or economic inequality that occurs between people benefits every single person (Scott,…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls contends that when we consider how to make an equitable society, we have to envision that we are all set under a "veil of ignorance," where we don't know anything about the different economical and social preferences that we are naturally introduced to. Principle one is that "Each person has the same indefeasible claim to a fully adequate scheme of equal basic liberties, which scheme is compatible with the same scheme of liberties for all.” Principle two on the other hand states "Social and economic inequalities are to satisfy two conditions: first, they are to be attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity; and second, they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least-advantaged members of society." A portion of Rawls appeal lies in the way that there is something in it for everybody. Liberals and libertarians accentuate principle 1, whereas the socialist would back up principle 2. Together these pieces give a philosophical establishment to American liberal vote based system, and Rawls basically fabricated a practical rationale to legitimize…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays