Preview

Van Gend En Loos: Creation of New Legal Order in European Court of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1046 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Van Gend En Loos: Creation of New Legal Order in European Court of Justice
EU Law Essay
Question: In retrospect was the European court of justice correct when it stated that in Van Gend en Loos (1963) a new legal order had been created? Discuss.
The judgement in Van Gend en Loos has undoubtedly had a huge impact upon the European Union and the way that it functions. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) claimed that the judgement had established a “new legal order” whether this is true is debatable but it is certainly a fundamental case in EU case law. The phrase “new legal order” was first used in Van Gend en Loos, so it was hard to know if that was what it was… Discuss what legal order means etc. The principle of direct effect (or immediate applicability) enables individuals to immediately invoke a European provision before a national or European court If this was the case it is not just Van Gend en Loos that established a new legal order, there were also other contributing factors. Namely those established by the Treaty of Rome.
The three European communities, with the Economic Community as the most prominent, were established by the 1951 Treaty of Paris and the 1958 Treaties of Rome. As an Integral part of this new system, The European Court of Justice created a large amount of new case law, it was stated that this case law was different to International law and so a new legal order had been established. It was different due to the involvement of the individual. This is reflected via the provision in the Treaty of Rome that elections to the European Parliament should now be direct which allows citizens of every member state to directly participate. Although the Parliament had existed before, the extent to which it was representative was doubtful, this change increased the importance of the European Parliament and therefore gave more force to the legislation that it drafted. The direct elections give the European parliament a legitimacy that other international institutions lack and it was argued that this new found legitimacy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to examine the historical and political significance of this case, it is fundamental to review the political discourse of the period in conjunction with case facts, notes, and finally, the decision. This assists us in our understanding of this benchmark case in completeness.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lesaffer, R. (2009). European Legal History: A Cultural and Political Perspective (pp. 34-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 7403 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tribunals and Court System

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3) European Law - This is law made by the European Union. The UK joined the EU on 1st January 1978. The European Law takes precedence over UK statute law.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    European Law is very complex law , within EU law there is various different treaties which are in place. Two most significant treaties which have importance to the legislative process are The Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union.…

    • 2450 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The absence of a written constitution … enables constitutional change to be brought about within the United Kingdom with the minimum of constitutional formality’ (Hilaire Barnett, Constitutional and Administrative Law 2011)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for EU law to be effective, individuals need to be able to enforce their rights, so in order to give…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Democratic Deficit in the Eu

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Since the establishment of supremacy in EU law by the European Court of Justice in Van Gend en Loos and Costa, it is primarily the law-making process of the EU itself that drives the debate on the perceived lack of democracy. Central to all of this is the complexity of the process that casts doubt upon its democratic legitimacy. Despite the Treaty of Lisbon (Lisbon) remedying much of the loathsome deficit, effort is still required as overwhelming flaws in the democratic legitimacy of the EU persist to which no single remedy is available. The most significant feature of the complexity of EU law-making throughout its various stages concerns the intra-EU balance of powers which furthers the debate on the democratic deficit. As such, focus must be placed upon the structure and function of the primary EU institutions which are undoubtedly interlinked to the claims of a democratic gap in the law-making process. Factors of representation, electoral politics and public scrutiny are also matters of importance and potentially propose a contrary account to the…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    “European law is based on two fundamental legal doctrines, direct effect and supremacy.”1 The doctrine of supremacy, which has no formal basis in the original Treaty of European Community,2 was first established by the European Court of Justice in the case of Flaminio Costa v ENEL3. The ECJ concluded in Costa that when conflicts arise, EU law always prevails over national law. Moreover, the ECJ argued that “the precedence of Community law is confirmed by Article 189, whereby a regulation ‘shall be binding’ and ‘directly applicable in all Member States’.”4 In other words, this doctrine of supremacy states that “in case, and to the extent, of irreconcilable results in the application of both legal systems to the same situation, the conflicting national law of member states becomes inapplicable.”5 Therefore, throughout this essay, I shall go on to examine the supremacy of EU Law over national law where this dialogue will be observed from the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) perspective and from the national perspective of some of the Member States of the EU, taking into account the tension present between the two perspectives.…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    supremacy

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aforementioned case stands for the conceptual basis of the supremacy of the EU law since the strength and, evidently, scope of it were developed in later decisions. The subsequent case provides that the legal status of an inconsistent national measure were…

    • 1215 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enforcement of Eu Law

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To answer this question I will firstly explain how EU law became incorporated within the member states I will then explain the various types of EU legislation's in circulation. This is important to define as the various types of methods will involve different enforcement procedures. Finally I will explain how EU law is enforced and the ways EU law will effect the member state and individual businesses. I will summarise my findings at the end of the essay, this will give details of all the key ideas I have ut across.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Micheal Dougan in “When worlds collide: competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy” opined that the principle of supremacy has been used as a tool to exclude national law which is inconsistent with EU law.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (Marshall (No.1)) [1986] 1 C.M.L.R. 688 arose in the United Kingdom. It concerned a Miss Marshall who had been employed as a Senior Dietician with the Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) from the 23rd of May 1974 until her dismissal on the 31st of March 1980, that is to say four weeks after she reached the age of 62. Since 1975 the Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) had a written policy of that in general, its female employees should retire at 60 while its male employees should retire at 65. The policy stated that “the normal retirement age will be the age at which social security pensions become payable”. The policy was an implied term of Miss Marshall’s employment contract. Miss Marshall’s employers waived this general policy in the case of Miss Marshall. If her employers had not done this, then she would have been dismissed on the 4th of February 1978 (upon reaching the age of 60) but was in fact employed until the 31st of March 1980 (four weeks after she reached the age of 62), therefore her employer waived they’re general retirement policy in respect of Miss Marshall for two years. The applicable pension legislation in the United Kingdom at the time of the dismissal stated that men were eligible to receive a state pension at the age of 65 and that women were to receive state pensions from the age of 60 (Section 27 (1) of the Social Security Act 1975). However this legislation does not impose any obligation to retire at the age at which the state pension becomes payable and when a person continues in employment after the date when their state pension becomes payable, the payment of the pension is deferred. According to the order of reference, the sole reason for the dismissal of Miss Marshall was the fact that she was a woman who had…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working Time Directive

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The European Court of Justice joined this case with a German case (Schultz-Hoff) and delivered its judgment on 20 January 2009. The key points of the judgement are that:…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays