|Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…
The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…
Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…
Metzger, M 2007, 'Making sense of credibility on the web: models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research ', Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58, no. 13, pp.2078-2091.…
Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…
Hence I will be able to capture the right and relevant information that I need and enable me to have a logical thinking of what I infer from the source. This includes measuring of the reliability of the resource like the author/authors of the resources. Experts or professor from that particular field will be a more trustable source as they are trained and specialized on that area. The fairness of the resource is also considered as if the resource is published from a commercial organization, then the source will definitely be more favorable to their main interest. The time and date of the resource will also be one of my criteria as this could affect the accuracy of it. For example, the resource might be outdated and being overwritten by a new claim. After checking the credibility of it, i will the break down the resource and analyse what is necessary for my essay and what is not. From there i will justify the questions i have from the essay and apply it with the useful information that i had capture from the resource. From here, i will eliminate all the unnecessary information from the resource and take out information which supports the answer to my question of the…
Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…
As a researcher, I must be aware of what information from the Internet. I must keep a look out for bias opinions, and cited materials.…
Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…
Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…
Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…
The criteria illustrated by Thede and Sewell (2010) is important in guiding users to differentiate between reliable and unreliable information. By using this criteria users become knowledgeable about evaluating the credibility of a website. The questions posed in the checklist prompt critical thinking process, and leads us to find the underlying intent of the website. The criteria assist users to check the validity of information by finding if the information is peer-reviewed or verified by qualified editor. Only if the found health information were from a valid scholarly source then it would be trusted. If the user’s intent is to validate the information then this criteria should be applied to any other website regardless of the underlying intent. For instance, commercial website’s sole intent is to sale their products. The Internet users now can search on the web for other websites that offer peer reviews on that product.…
However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…
Today in society, source credibility is becoming a bigger issue. Many people and students now a days find themselves in a predicament where credible sources are needed to help with research projects, essays, books etc. The internet is a big place and is filled with insane amounts of information for societies reach. The question is whether these sources are credible sources or just information filled in by average person with little experience or knowledge in the subject.…
information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…