Preview

Utilitarianism and Euthanasia

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1031 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism and Euthanasia
Laurentine Asare Philosophy 103 April 28, 2011 ETHICS
The moral issue that I will discuss about is Euthanasia. Euthanasia simplu means bringing the death of another for the benefit of that person and also known as mercy killing. “When a person carries out an act of euthanasia, he brings about the death of another person because he believes the latter's present existence is so bad that she would be better off dead, or believes that unless he intervenes and ends her life, it will become so bad that she would be better off dead” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). There are two forms of euthanasia; voluntary and non-voluntary. Voluntary euthanasia means if it’s coming from the patient him or herself. Non - voluntary means a family member making the decision for the patient. In an active euthanasia which is illegal, it is saying that you are performing direct action to take someone’s life. In a passive euthanasia which is legal, it is allowing someone to die by not performing some life sustaining action. What does euthanasia has to do with morality? My morality behind euthanasia is that euthanasia should be the right to die for patients who are intensely ill. Euthanasia is natural in a way because in real life, there is a matter of life and death. It is natural for people to live but death is also part of nature. No one can live forever, and since euthanasia is performed on people facing serious illness and facing death. Euthanasia seems to understand the course of nature and its ways by letting the patient wish be fulfilled and let them die in peace instead of suffering in pain.
Jeremy Bentham, founder of Utilitarianism. Actions are good/bad, right/wrong based on whether or not they will produce

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reg Crew Euthanasia

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First there was Jeremy Bentham the one to think of the Utilitarianism theory. Bentham was an act Utilitarian. Bentham was interested in the principle of utility, this is the theory of usefulness that suggests that an action is right if it brings the greatest happiness for the greatest number. He developed his ethical system based on ancient hedonism, which perused physical pleasure and avoided physical pain. Bentham believed that a moral act is one that maximises pleasure and minimises pain. From this Jeremy Bentham invented something called the ‘hedonic calculus’ this was his way of measuring the good and bad of an action.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the United States, but still considered cruel to some people. Animals that are in agony and need mercy are euthanized. Some think that it's cruel to put animals out of there misery, but some think it's cruel not to. Euthanasia, mercy killing used on animals, is fair to animals in suffer. If a dog got hit by a car and was in great pain, you could either wait until it dies on its own, or euthanize the dog, putting it out of its misery.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…

    • 2132 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Living is more valuable than dying and threatening to diminish the value of life is dangerous. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of doctors intentionally ending a terminally ill patient’s life in what is purportedly a gentle and dignified manner. The term originated in ancient Greek and means “easy death.” Doctors perform euthanasia by administering lethal drugs or by withholding treatment that would prolong the patient’s life. Physician-assisted suicide is also a form of euthanasia, but the difference between the two methods is that in euthanasia, doctors end the patient’s life with lethal injections, whereas, in physician-assisted suicide, patients kill themselves with a lethal amount of drugs prescribed by the doctors.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted dying is a very controversial issue and it is only becoming more controversial with more cases coming to light. Many people believe that assisting a patient in dying goes against the moral code that doctors should follow. Their job is to go to any measures to sustain the life under their care, but what about individuals suffering with no hope of getting better? Wouldn’t doctors then be obligated morally to relieve these individuals of their agony and put them to peace? Considering that, some argue in favor of the sick and believe they deserve a voice and a right to choose how much suffering is enough suffering. Should someone who is suffering from a terminal illness that…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of euthanasia, passive or otherwise, brings up controversial feelings. Passive euthanasia, or the letting nature take its course approach with no extraordinary measures taken to preserve life, is commonly accepted with minimal outrage. Generally, only extremists take a stance against this practice. Active euthanasia however strikes a chord within people that put us at odds not only with each other but within ourselves as well. It is important to understand that active euthanasia in this essay is characterized by the intentional act of ending your own or someone else’s life when terminal illness presents itself. I myself believe that the practice of active euthanasia should be made available but there is much work to be done on defining when it is appropriate. J. Gay-Williams spoke against active euthanasia in his article titled “The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia”. The title alone leaves little guesswork as far as what his beliefs are. He claims an understanding of why we lean towards more acceptance of this practice but remains convinced that our beliefs are misplaced for three very distinct, compelling yet simple reasons. In my essay, I will discuss and critique his first two lines of logic; 1) the argument from nature and 2) the argument from self-interest.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is defined in Webster's Dictionary as "the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reason of mercy (Webster's Dictionary 401). The Hemlock Society defines it as "justifiable suicide, that is rational and planned self-deliverance". The word euthanasia comes from the Greek- eu, which means good and thanatos death. No matter what your definition, euthanasia is ethical, and physicians should be allowed to assist in it legally (Derek Humphry, 18).…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, somebody could perceive euthanasia as a courageous act to assist somebody you love. Whether it is to relieve pain or end a history with an incurable disease, essentially our inherent virtues will help us chose the right decision to help a friend in a very dire situation. The right decision in this case would be to grant the final wish of a patient pleading to end months of suffering and hardship. I think that one issue many people have with euthanasia is that in certain circumstances, involved family members could be trying to take advantage of the situation for their personal gain. Whether they want to euthanize the relative because they wish to be freed of the burden or because they want to get their money, in both instances those persons’ actions are defined by the vices that influence their actions. Greed, rashness and selfishness are all vices that will inhibit an individual’s ability to make clear headed morally correct decisions. In one of his books, Aristotle refers to these invirtuous people as having a distinctly distorted moral vision. Because they lack the proper virtues to guide them in decision-making, the invirtuous could actually end up harming themselves as well as other people. So really any situation in which somebody is prematurely or unjustly euthanized would be immoral because it is an action influenced by someone’s vices. This action does not follow the virtues of happiness or courage, but…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham's Utilitarianism

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jeremy Bentham was a British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer. He is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to End Ones Life

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is described as the intentionally killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. Euthanasia is frowned upon by society because it is deemed unethical to intentionally take one’s own life regardless of what life has to throw at them. In today’s society, individuals have now started realizing that deciding to take one’s own life is a personal choice they can make and should not be restricted by moral or social laws from doing so. Depending on which theory (Kantianism/Utilitarianism), one can come to a conclusion if they support euthanasia or not. If one has the right to preserve their life, they certainly have to right take away their life. Euthanasia is a personal choice that’s should be freely made as long as the decision is made when the individual is in the right state of mind.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Killing is often referred as an immoral act, which an equal sign has been drawn to Euthanasia. As people regard them same as killing, they are therefore regarded as immoral. However, Euthanasia may be voluntary when people rather be dead than being to tortured by extreme illness. By disregarding his/her right to die can be immoral(moral). The morality is determined through balance of these arguments, which can be ambiguous.…

    • 982 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the essay, The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia, J. Gay-Williams states that euthanasia is inherently and morally wrong. He further argues that euthanasia is the intentional and deliberate act of taking a person’s life. Gay-Williams supports his claim by presenting three arguments which will prove why euthanasia violates the nature and dignity of human beings. In this essay we will discuss two of those arguments and some of their weaknesses in: The Argument from Nature and The Argument from Practical Effects.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays