Preview

Utilitarianism and Happiness

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
945 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism and Happiness
Utilitarianism

In his book, J.S. Mill attempts to build on Jeremy Bentham's original idea of Utilitarianism. His definition of the moral theory is one that is grounded in Bentham's original work but also extends to include remarks to criticisms of Utilitarianism.
Mill believes that, like Bentham, utility is what is valuable to society. Utility, according to Mill, is the promotion of pleasure or the absence of pain. He defines this as happiness, which is why he refers to utility as the Greatest Happiness Principle (Mill 55). Thus, pleasure (or painlessness) is what society finds valuable. Because society finds happiness valuable, it must attempt to maximize total happiness. Mill describes that the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain are the only ends desirable to society. Because of this, any event, decision, or experience is favored only because it is a source for happiness. This means that actions are good if they lead to more happiness and bad if they prevent it (Mill 55) .
Mill further states that happiness or pleasure is stratified. There are different levels of pleasures. Some pleasures are of higher quality than other pleasures and thus more desirable than pleasures of lower quality. Mill defines a high quality pleasure as one that if people would choose that pleasure, even if it brought upon slight pains, over another pleasure. The adage "Ignorance is bliss" would be one with Mill would strongly disagree. He says that once people are mindful of these higher pleasures, they will desire actions that promote those types of pleasure (Mill 56-58).
Mill also states that Utilitarianism is not promoting selfishness or self-indulgence. The happiness mentioned is not solely that of the individual, but primarily that of society as a whole. In fact, all actions should be based on what is better for society as a whole. Usually, however, most actions that an individual can take have a very small scope in its effect for the whole of society. But it



Bibliography: Mill, J S. Utilitarianism. 1861. Ed. Roger Crisp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Smart, J.J.C, and Bernard Williams. "The places of rules in act-utilitarianism." Utilitarianism: For & Against. 1975. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 42-56.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    He thought it was not possible to quantify pleasure and did not agree with the hedonic calculus, he believed in higher and lower pleasures. Higher quality pleasures were better than lower quality pleasures. He believed that higher pleasures of the mind were better than lower pleasures of the body. Once the minimum requirements of the body had been fulfilled, the real moral business involves pursuits of higher goods. Mill quoted “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates satisfied than a fool satisfied”. Mill is basically implying that it is better to have a higher pleasure than a cheap and quick pleasure. Humans have the power to get pleasures from the mind compared to animals who cannot think for…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill, through his Greatest Happiness Principle, a set of ethical teaching known as Utilitarianism, seeks to bring about the greatest good in the world by setting into play a morality that gives happiness to the largest number of people possible. Mill argues that the purpose of morality is to benefit mankind, and thus the ultimate end of morality lies in providing the most amount of pleasure to the greatest number of people. In The Greatest Happiness Principle, human actions are measured by their consequences. For example, if one were a ruler of ten million people, and a famine had diminished the food supply to that which only half of those people could survive on; to kill off five million people would not only be justified but morally obligatory. After all, in this scenario, without the death of five million…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his Work, Jeremy Bentham states Utilitarianism as "that principle which approves or disproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have augmented or diminished the happiness of the party whose interest is in question." Plainly stated, Bentham defines utilitarianism as the ethical rightness or wrongness of an action directly related to the utility of that action. Utility is more specifically defined as a measure of the goodness or badness of the consequences of an action. J.S Mill later expands Bentham's definition of the term by saying utility "holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness." Mill defines happiness as "the absence of pain." Mill further states that there are different levels of pleasures. He states that "some pleasures are of higher quality than others and thus more desirable." Mill states that, if all pleasures are equal and the only difference is in their quantities then human beings and lesser beings (such as a "pig" ) would receive gratification from the same sources of pleasure. Whereas Bentham's utilitarianism makes no distinction between different beings and assigns the same pleasure to all members of the community, Mill separates human beings and lesser beings, which have pleasure that is of different category and worth. Mill…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory of utilitarianism was developed by and associated by Jeremy Bentham and utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory where the moral value of an action can be judged by its consequences. Three main philosophers have come up with different types of utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham introducing Act Utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill trying to improve the flaws that he encountered with Bentham’s theory with his Rule Utilitarianism and lastly, Peter Singer with his preference utilitarianism.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham held that all pleasures are the same. It is still necessary to weigh pleasures, to multiply them by different numbers as you try to calculate the consequences of your action, but the criteria for the weighing of pleasures are subjectively felt intensity, duration, purity, and other considerations of this nature. Mill, on the other hand, disagreed. Mill thought that ‘it is better to be Socrates unsatisfied rather than a pig satisfied,’ whereas Bentham had famously opined that ‘push pin is as good as poetry’ – push pin being a mindless game for children. This is a way that Mill shows his splitting of pleasure into higher and lower pleasures. The higher pleasures included intellectuality and pleasure of the mind, whereas lower pleasures are more like materialistic needs such as food and water. He believes that it is much easier to acquire the lower pleasures in comparison to the higher pleasures which require hardship and suffering to obtain. Mill understood that both higher and lower pleasures are connected, because in order to survive we must eat and drink, but when we fulfil that and are comfortable, we should always pursue intellectual gain rather than bodily…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of Mill and applying his theory, if it is only a ‘lower pleasure’ then what would be the point in building on this happiness if it isn’t long term? The idea of the pain and suffering caused to someone is so great and there seems to be no way of putting a stop to it, the whole point of utilitarianism is undermined. Also, there is the example of the swine ethic; one woman’s pain brings ten men happiness, which contradicts Bentham’s idea completely as in this example, one person’s pain is another person’s pleasure, so where is the middle…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” John Stuart Mill utilitarianism, 1863…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarianism, by John Stuart Mill, is an essay written to provide support for the value of utilitarianism as a moral theory, and to respond to misconceptions about it. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Mill defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain. He argues that pleasure can differ in quality and quantity, and that pleasures that are rooted in one's higher faculties should be weighted more heavily than baser pleasures. Furthermore, Mill argues that people's achievement of goals and ends, such as virtuous living, should be counted as part of their happiness. Mill argues that utilitarianism coincides with "natural" sentiments that originate from humans' social nature. Therefore, if society were to embrace utilitarianism as an ethic, people would naturally internalize these standards as morally binding. Mill argues that happiness is the sole basis of morality, and that people never desire anything but happiness. He supports this claim by showing that all the other objects of people's desire are either means to happiness, or included in the definition of happiness. Mill explains at length that the sentiment of justice is actually based on utility, and that rights exist only because they are necessary for human happiness. The theory of utilitarianism has been criticized for many reasons. Critics hold that it does not provide adequate protection for individual rights, that not everything can be measured by the same standard, and that happiness is more complex than reflected by the theory. Mill's essay represents his attempt to respond to these criticisms, and thereby to provide a more complex and nuanced moral theory. Mill's argument comprises five chapters. His first chapter serves as an introduction to the essay. In his second chapter, Mill discusses the definition of utilitarianism, and presents…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the beginning of Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill states that throughout history very little progress has been made towards developing a set of moral standards to judge what is morally right or wrong. Although a certain disagreement about such foundations can also be found in the most “certain” sciences, in those areas truths can still have meaning without understanding the principles underlying them. On the other hand, in philosophy, where all actions exist to proceed towards a particular end, statements unfounded upon a general principle have very little validity. Therefore Mill says that in order to know what morality dictates, it is necessary to know by what standard human actions should be judged. He rejects the idea of a moral instinct inherent in human mind, which supplies us with this ability to judge. Even if such a sense would exist, it wouldn’t show us whether something is right or wrong in a particular matter. Instead, Mill assumes that right and wrong are questions of experience and he tries to show that the principle of utility or “the greatest happiness principle” is the foundation of this distinction.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitariansim

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill, a second advocate of Utilitarianism, invented the idea of qualitative utilitarianism. Mill saw Bentham’s quantifying system as dehumanizing and replaced it with considerations which are more qualitative in origin. He advocates rule utility, the idea that the greatest good for the greatest number of people for the longest amount of time possible, should be sought out. While still filled with problems of the unequal treatment of people, qualitative utility surpasses quantitative utility because it holds moral and intellectual pleasures higher than physical pleasures. This idea is captured in Mill’s statement, “It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” Mill also distinguishes between happiness and contentment, stating that all pleasures can cause contentment, however only certain…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mills defines utilitarianism as whatever action is right to promote happiness, In other ways go for what is the greater good. Mills define happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain. Mill believes that happiness is the sole basis of morality, and that people never desire anything but happiness. The basic principle of Mill's Utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle; an…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham and Mills

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mills constructed the theory of “Rule utilitarianism”, which focuses on general rules that everyone should follow to bring about the greatest good for that community. Rule utilitarianism establishes the best overall rule by determining the course of action which, when pursued by the whole community, leads to the best outcome. Rule utilitarianism argues that, in any situation, we must obey the given rule even if it does not lead to the greatest pleasure for us in that particular situation. Despite of this, Mill maintained that the well-being of the individual was of the greatest importance and that happiness is most effectively gained when individuals are free to pursue their own ends, subject to rules that protect the common good for all. To contrast this greatly, Bentham’s theory of act utilitarianism maintained that, whenever possible, the principle of utility must be directly applied for each individual situation, abolishing this idea of “general rules” which are believed to apply to everyone. This provides Act Utilitarianism a greater amount of flexibility, as it enables to take into account specific individual situations at given moments, although the actions that it justifies can change. Despite of this contrast, a similarity is present, with Bentham agreeing with Mill’s emphasis that a person’s well-being is of the utmost importance.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Stuart Mill’s theory of utilitarianism focused more carefully on the shift from quantity to quality. He accepts that being governed by feelings of pleasure and pain is subjective, he challenges us to show how it is not a principle which governs all human behavior. Mill believed that humans would always seek the ‘higher’ pleasure over the ‘lower’ pleasure. He states that only those who have experienced both kinds of pleasure are capable of deciding which are morally better - “better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied”. Mill calls these type of people competent judges. Mill believes the competent judges would always choose the higher intellectual pleasure over the lower sensual ones. However, Mill explains that the higher pleasures are only accessible by humans, not by other creatures.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Individual Hapiness

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Mill, John Stuart. “Utilitarianism.” Twenty Questions. By G Lee Bowie, Meredith W Michaels, and Robert C Solomon. 2004. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2011. 600-601. Print.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill S Ethical Theory

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Mill, we ought to do any action/act that makes best use of the sum-total of anybody’s pleasure. Moreover we should do anything that makes the most of our own pleasure, the society agrees with it, and it increases everyone 's pleasure (Wilson, Fred 1990). Our aspiration to do the right and acceptable act is based on the action itself. An act could be right even if it is not intrinsically…

    • 703 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays