Preview

Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism
Personal experiences have the tendency to impact and alter people’s views. With many backgrounds, it’s difficult for people to agree on what is considered good or bad because of the different background they come from. Furthermore the interpretation of the importance of good for some people may not be important to others.
A good state of affairs is based off of a matter of opinion. What some consider “good” affairs; others may consider “poor”. The statement, there is no single objective sense of a good state of affairs holds truth. Philippa Foot’s Utilitarianism and the Virtues states, “ It can never be right to prefer a worse state of affairs to a better” (198). Foot is correct, however, this statement doesn’t say what specifically would be considered worse or better. If Jenny, the green thumbed outdoors lover woke to a rainstorm, she would be happy her plants were watered. If Lauren, the bride to be, had her outdoor wedding reception during the rainstorm, she would not be thrilled. People are subjective. Therefore what's a “good state of affairs” for Jenny was not a “good state of affairs” for Lauren. Perspectives matter and should not be disregarded.
It is important to question the meaning of a “good state of affairs”. Foot believes, “We should begin by asking why we are so sure that we even understand expressions such as ‘good state of affairs’…”(199). Society uses phrases including “a good event” or “a good thing” commonly therefore the importance of a“ good state of affairs” becomes weakened. This makes it difficult to place a meaning on what “a good state of affairs” is since everyone has different views on the phrase. Since people have different opinion, it is difficult pin pointing what people consider to be good or bad.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When conflicted, naturally, we as humans look to others for guidance. Whether a broad problem faced by many or a personal problem affecting one, the support of another can sometimes help. But what problems must one face alone? We can base these moral decisions by factor of benefit. In other words, a personal problem is one that affects one person and the resolution to that problem would only benefit him/her in result. Additionally, if the ultimate decision to resolve, or repair that certain problem lies in an individuals hand, even though possibly persuaded by the community, it would be considered a personal problem, rather than a social issue.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human good can be described as something that betters an individual and does not limit their potential for a fully functioning…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To every child, good or bad seemed very clear to mind. If one stole another’s belongings, lie to their parents, or hurt anyone in any way, it would be seen as a wrong doing, as a morally incorrect behavior. But somehow, as life becomes more complicated, everything that has been done might be based on multiple reasons involving both positive and negative elements. Any act of good cannot be explained as simply because of one’s kindness, and this principle can go with an ill-minded act as well.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6.2 - By letting the person express themselves about their likes and dislikes, their interests, their choices and supporting them in a way they feel good, clean and tidy, all these will contribute to their overall wellbeing and this will affect if they generally feel happy and good about themselves on a day to day basis.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Morality is a necessary character in interactions or organizations. Generally, the words “right” and “wrong” are antonym and the meanings are used to define the positive and negative even though we are taught not to judge what other people do. However, the ideas of black and white or right and wrong in morality are difficult to determine because we usually use our own measurement to judge others based on our beliefs, experiences and knowledge. In reality, there are not only black and white but the grey area also is existed where good people can do bad things and where bad people can do good things. According to Philip Zimbardo, psychologist and a professor at Stanford University, the line between bad and good isn’t fixed but it is movable and…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kick The Game Analysis

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both negative and positive experiences shape a person to be who he or she is. However, the impacts of these two experiences are debated. Some people would argue that negative experiences have a harmful effect on how individuals become better people in life. They may become jaded and forfeit their right to optimism. However, negative experiences actually have a more positive impact than positive experiences on how people become better because those experiences can be reflected upon and one can learn and change to develop and argue for morally right positions, such as fighting for the right to a proper education, freedom to participate in group activities regardless of the person, and protection from corrupt, evil humans.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Susan B Anthony Analysis

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Someone once said, “Be a good person, but don’t waste time to prove it.” Seemingly people are good, but not everyone is able to discern that. However, no matter the viewer's perception, it is evident that good is more prevalent in today’s society and more people choose to be good rather than evil. People can see that mankind chooses to be good through the actions of leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, and Urvashi Vaid.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Describe some of the ways that the Person-Centred Approach differs to Cognitive Behavioural and Psychodynamic Approaches to Counselling.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it in an absolute way, “this is a good essay” or in a relative way, “compared to the previous one, this essay is good”. Or in a utilitarian way, “this essay will get a good result” However none of these uses or descriptions actually tell us what the word good means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is an expansive field of normative ethics that believes that the action that you take should be that which maximises utility, that is to say prospering and maximizing happiness whilst mitigating suffering or sadness as much as possible. Whilst it was once often considered a hedonistic field, there being one that argues pleasure being the only true, intrinsic good or aim, it is now more commonly referred to that of a consequentiality field, focussed more on consequentialism. It may be argued then that there is quite a difference between the seemingly 'old Utilitarianism' and that of the new consequentialism.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good vs Bad

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    good and what is bad but our society has a general consensus of what those terms mean.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Utilitarianism is the view that an act is right if it equals the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians describe moral actions as actions that boost something good and lessen something that is bad. Virtue, knowledge, and goodwill are all good but they are only good if they give people a pleasurable existence. Pain is the only thing that is intrinsically bad. Utilitarians focus on the result of an act instead of the inherent nature of the act. An example would be an individual throwing their garbage into the ocean. Utilitarians would say throwing garbage into the ocean is not necessarily bad, but the effect it leaves will cause harm sooner or later and that is what is bad. I do not think that utilitarianism can be an ethical theory. It is simply too difficult to determine whether the utilitarian theory can be justified. The dilemma of trying to focus on a positive outcome or focusing on the actions that we take in order to accomplish the greatest good is too hard to measure.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hedonistic Utilitarianism

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethics that is based on the outcome and not on how that outcome is achieved. It is based on the principal that a belief that benefits majority must be preferred. That means that all the choices made can be categorized as being generous or miserable, honestly or dishonestly dealt, irrespective of the way but must make more individuals happy. Money minded utilitarianism will measure happiness in terms of money. When we consider lottery, we need to think that there is going to be a winners that will be happy and those who didn’t win will be either bit sad or won’t care. The next question that a utilitarian will consider is the degree of happiness or sadness. The level of happiness will be enormous for the winner and others associated with him but the sadness will be negligible by those who did not win a lottery. Those who did not win do not lose hope and are seen buying another lottery ticket and may waste heaps of money for years. Besides that money raised from lottery is often used for social wellbeing programmes and…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays