Preview

Utilitarian Approach to an Economy

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarian Approach to an Economy
1 Introduction
Utilitarianism is a major position in normative ethics stemming from the late 18th and 19th century philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Contrary to the deontological approach to ethics that perceives morality as a duty or a moral rule that has to be followed, utilitarianism is a form of teleological ethics focussing on the consequences of actions meaning that the moral value of an action is solely determined by its outcome. Thus an action is considered right if it tends to produce happiness and wrong if it leads to the reverse effects of happiness, not only to the executer of the action but also to everyone else that is – either directly or indirectly – affected by the action.
The influence of utilitarianism on other areas besides philosophy, such as law, politics and economy, over the last centuries has become clearly notable, whereas this paper focuses - besides a detailed description of the classical utilitarianism itself - explicitly on its influence on decision making with respect to the economy. Based on the common characterization of utilitarianism that ethically right acts are those that produce “the greatest good (or greatest happiness) for the greatest number” this paper aims at examining this formulation in detail with respect to applying it to the decision making process in business which has a considerable influence on economy.
Chapter 2 aims to set a frame for the later theoretical discussion by presenting the basic concepts of utilitarianism. Chapter 3 further deals with the fundamental idea of the utilitarian theory formulated by Jeremy Bentham and several problems associated with its application. Chapter 4 covers John S. Mill’s enhancement of Bentham’s theory. Based on this background information, chapter 5 illustrates the how utilitarianism can be applied to decision making in business and thus impacting the economy by presenting three distribution formulations that can be derived from the classical utilitarian



Bibliography: Bentham, J. (1961). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. In Dewey, Gramlich, and Loftsgordon. Pp. 163-178. Drabble, M. (2000). The Oxford Companion to English Literature (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Höffe, O Hutcheson, F. (1990). An Inquiry Into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Hildesheim: Olms. Lyons, D. (1997). Mill 's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Lanham.: Rowman and Littlefield. Mill, J. S. (1979). Utilitarianism, ed. George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. Mill, J. S. (1985). Der Utilitarismus. Stuttgart: Reclam. Rosen, F. (2003). Classical Utilitarianism from Hume to Mill. Routledge. Internet Sources

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The idea of utilitarianism classifies actions of being "morally" right or wrong solely based on the results and outcomes of the actions. This paper will analyze the problem that Arthur, "the art dealer", faces with artwork pieces he stumbles upon. Arthur's predicament is that he is given an opportunity to buy looted artworks. His dilemma is to either purchase or to not purchase the art work. This paper will evaluate the two analysis views of a utilitarian: act (extreme) and rule (restricted).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psci 231 Midterm Review

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Section One: 1. What is, “Utilitarianism” and why is it important to the study of businessgovernment relations? Utilitarianism is a usually described as the greatest happiness for the greatest number. It reflects the action that produces the most happiness for people; meaning that an action is good if it produces a higher ultility of happiness. The thoery treats all members of a society equally, balances the inequalities in wealth between rich and poor people and justifies human acts. For example, consider a single mother stealing baby formlua. In this case, the mother is not harming anyone else and her baby is getting the food it needs. The happiness of the mother is justified because her actions did not harm anyone, and her baby having enough food increases her ulitily. John S. Mill would focus on the things that give people happiness rather than judeging actions based on religion and culture. Critisicsms of utilitariansim can also be made. It is understood that utilitarianism measures the total hapiness of people. However, it is not not right to assume that two people will have the same level of utility over something. An example of this can be depicted in the following scenario. Person A loves horses and buys a new sadle which gives her a total util of 50. Person B rather, is interested in sports car. Person B is uninterested in the saddle and would most likely produce a util of about 10. Therefore it is unpossible to say that levels of utility are compareable amongst people. Another criticsm of utilitarianism is that it fails to promote individual rights. Say that a mother likes hitting her child, and while doing so, her level of utility increases. Utilitarianism would support the mother and justify her acts because she is obtaining an increasing amont of utility. However, hitting your child repetively is morally and ethically wrong. But, in this case, according to utilitarianism, the utility gain of the mother is greater than the utility cost endured by the…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The utilitarianism theory of ethics focuses on weighing options for actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for the individual. This approach gives little consideration to the morals as long as the outcome benefits one’s self, even at the expense of some individuals. Morality issues receive consideration if the action taken is a moral one. For example, a person may not personally believe in war, but a soldier will serve when called because he or she believes in serving his or her country (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, such a simplistic route, taken especially by Bentham, overlooks other vital aspects of economic activities. The possibility of a comparative measurement of utility, along with the social, rather than individual, influence on making choices, is debated by reformists. Additions and reassessments of ideas contribute to the formation of an early egalitarian spirit within the utilitarian framework, making the economic analysis more humanistic, realistic and…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his Essay Utilitarianism Mill elaborates on Utilitarianism as a moral theory and responds to misconceptions about it. Utilitarianism, in Mill's words, is the view that »actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.«1 In that way, Utilitarianism offers an answer to the fundamental question Ethics is concerned about: ‘How should one live?' or ‘What is the good or right way to live?'.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and contrasting ethical theories helps one to understand ones guidance system which helps or aides one through their decision making process. “Each theory emphasizes different points such as predicting the outcome and following one's duties to others in order to reach an ethically correct decision.” (2011) Each theory has a familiar thread with an end goal. In this paper each of the following three ethical theories utilitarianism, Virtue, and Deontological will be described relating to ethics and morality. Concluding with a personal experience with which the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to utilitarianism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill 's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin 's "The One 's Who Walk Away from Omelas."…

    • 1220 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his piece, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism” J. J. C. Smart illustrated just how different extreme utilitarianism and restricted utilitarianism are from each other and which one is more realistic to follow. Smart developed this idea by supplying his readers with various examples on each side and explaining them thoroughly. Smart’s objective from presenting this piece is to show just how unreasonable restricted utilitarianism is in most, if not all situations. He also explains why people should live their lives the way an extreme utilitarian would. Through the course of this paper there will be multiple examples of each kind of utilitarianism, restricted and extreme, and Smart’s opinions on the matter. While some examples will support…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writings of John Stuart Mill, the father of modern liberalism, promotes ideas of democracy, saying that the interests of the majority is important. One of these ideas is Utilitarianism, which suggests that the correct moral choice is the one that maximizes utility. One example of this being that the death of one person to save multiple lives instead of letting many people die is the best choice in most cases, since it benefits the most people. Peter Singer goes even further and suggests that people are morally obligated to help and give to others above all else until doing so would harm yourself. I will be examining these two beliefs in this essay and ultimately deciding if maximizing utility is always the correct moral action.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During many years that question is being formulated and many scholars had a very difficult time to decide if it was possible to follow God's will and the principle of utility maximization. The principle of utility maximization was a theory created by John Stuart Mill and presented in his book Utilitarianism (1863). Societies throughout the years have argued that those theories are hard to combine, since Utilitarianism seeks for self-development and God's teachings seek for community growth. This paper will start with a context on actuality of society, then it will try to clarify what is the Bible view of Utilitarianism by explaining the principle of Utilitarianism, what society has to change to avoid to forget God's principles and only base their behavior on Mill's theory, how society should accept both theories and combine them into one in order to create a better society.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book, J.S. Mill attempts to build on Jeremy Bentham's original idea of Utilitarianism. His definition of the moral theory is one that is grounded in Bentham's original work but also extends to include remarks to criticisms of Utilitarianism.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper examines the procedure that were followed that it is a common sight to see on the street, children and sometimes old, physically handicapped, beggars and sickly people begging for food and some money. It critically examines these procedures in the moral dilemma with reference of applying the concepts: rule and act utilitarianism. Should we give these beggars money or not? In deciding whether we give or not, the answer for that is we should give. Why? Act utilitarianism basically states that an action is moral if it produces the greatest happiness for the most people. This reason alone the act of giving them would be a good idea, because it would benefit the most amount of people. At a first glance in the problem, by just wishing them to just go away, ignoring and disappear from our sight is directly immoral. You’re giving them pain despite the rule of greatest happiness and pleasure - utilitarianism. However in the contrary it is really right that by giving it encourages them to become lazy and to be dependent on us, but what we are looking here is our act how we respond to them. That is our focal point giving them or not giving them by the prospect of utilitarianism in which we should act in such way that our actions produce the greatest happiness or pleasure. Whatever will be the consequences on how they used the money were out of that. If we reflect off of the act utilitarianism it is all about happiness the pleasure that is produced by the action. If we don’t give them even the smallest amount of money, we feel guilty and there is no pleasure. Here is that we will be viewed and judged as being moral through our actions. With this case, it was stated that is it not true that these people need the money more than we do, right here and right now? The truth is it is really true that they need the money more than we do because why would they be asking money if they didn’t need it? And see? The effect of giving them is pleasure. In terms of my own…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics