Preview

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess Sociological Explanations of the Nature and Extent of Family Diversity Today.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess Sociological Explanations of the Nature and Extent of Family Diversity Today.
Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today.

Family diversity is the idea that there are a range of different family types, rather than a single dominant one like the nuclear family. It is associated with the post-modernists idea that in today’s society increasing choice about relationships is creating greater family diversity. Item A makes clear that different sociologists ‘are divided over both the extent of family diversity and its importance’. The Functionalists and the New Rights view increased family diversity as ‘a serious threat’; whilst Robert Chester argues in recent years there has been a ‘shift from the conventional to the neo-conventional family’. In today’s society there are many different family types the nuclear family which makes up the largest percentage of family types in the UK, single parent families, co-habiting families, gay families, inter-racial families, reconstituted families, joint families and transsexual families. This is interesting because in previous societies, this variety of family types would not have been accepted however in today’s society family diversity is much more easily accepted. However functionalists and the New Rights tend to have very traditional opinions on family diversity, they believe that anything that deviates from the nuclear family is negative and unnatural and individuals raised in different family types will not have the stability necessary to make them valuable members of society. Charles Murray of the New Right perspective, associated children born out of wedlock or ‘illegitimates’ with the ‘underclass’. He suggested the fathers of theses ‘illegitimates’ were ‘unskilled young men, who were unwilling to take up uninspiring work’. He believed the mothers of these ‘illegitimates’ ‘would be better off on benefits’ than marrying these ‘unskilled young men’. These illegitimate children with unemployed, uninvolved fathers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    life and family

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, the premodern era in the British society was greatly dominated by the traditionally recognized nuclear family as the main definition of a family unit. Acknowledged the perfect nuclear family, the 'cereal packet family' is where the whole family gather at the breakfast table in the morning. Structurally, the husband is the bread winner and the wife's duties include housework and childcare.(Browne K). Return to the modern era, rapidly changing times and social standards mean we must reconsider Murdock's ideology of a 'family'. Argumentatively, individuals declaring…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists employ the idea of the nuclear family being the main universal family in society and most benefitting. The nuclear family functions to meet the pro dominant means of society (sexual reproduction, educational and economic functions). The family allows each member of the family to shine individually and enjoy success. Functionalist Charles Murray also argues other family institutions weaken the production of society’s needs. Divorce is ultimately highlighted as one of the main causes of this creation of new reconstituted families which are presumably less effective in meeting the functional needs of society through the family.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way in which families in the UK have become more diverse is through an increase of same-sex marriages and families; when lesbian or gay couples live together with children. This can be linked to social policy in 1967 which legalised homosexuality in the UK and as a result made homosexuality more socially accepted and also allowed homosexuals to start their own families.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in the contemporary UK (17)…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly the increase of single parents (lone parents) has tripled since 1970s in the UK. About 25% of all families with dependent children are single-parent families. There are various reasons which contribute to the increase of single parenthood but one main one is the demographical changes in the UK, is divorce. Divorce was legalised in the early 1970s and as a consequences it is cheaper and easier to get a divorce and this one of the explanations for the growth in lone-parent families since the early 1970’s. Whereas in the past it would take years to get a divorce and even then the outcome was not always fair. Feminist argue that diversity is valued and liberal as it gives women a choice. They also argue that this not only benefits women but en as well as they can have more time with the child and care for their children, then in the past that was only seen as the women job. However these traditional values are stilled established by ethnic groups not so much.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dh3N 34

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay will discuss the “modern family Structures” within society and explore the lack of any “normal” or standard family. Using existing sociology perspectives this essay will further discuss modern behaviours, experiences and life chances within a specific family unit and how they fit the existing theories. Finaly the author will evaluate the usefulness if any of these theories and how they can be used in a coherent manner to explain the impact they have on a family unit and in turn what impact the family has on the individual.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modernist approaches to the family such as functionalism and the New Right emphasise the dominance of the nuclear family type in modern society.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another issue the new right have with diversity is that family diversity encourages a dependency culture. They are ague that any type of family that is unstable such as reconstituted families, lone-parent families and cohabiting families present a risk of dependency on the welfare state. This is extremely detrimental to society as the welfare state is a ‘perverse incentive’; it takes money from those who work hard, gives money to those who do nothing, and allows fathers to avoid their duty as breadwinners.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today (24 marks)…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The family has been the focus of study for many different sociologists, all of which can be criticized in some form.Throughout this essay I am going to examine how the different theoretical approaches explain how family structures and the roles of individuals within them have changed in relation to each of the historical stages that Western society is said to have developed through.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists are classed as modernists when it comes to their opinions on family diversity in post-modern UK. But they also see modern society as clear-cut, fixed and predictable. They think that the best and strongest family type is the nuclear family. The main functionalist who is focused on is Parsons. He came up with the functional fit, which is where pre-industrial society and the extended family changed into industrial society and the nuclear family. He also believes that the nuclear family meets all of society’s needs the best unlike any of the other diverse family types which society has to offer. Functionalists see all other family types as inadequate, abnormal or deviant. This shows that they don’t think that any other family type other than the nuclear family will benefit society and help to achieve the best it can. Functionalists also believe that there is no need for family diversity on society. They also feel that families such as single parent or same-sex families are inadequate or abnormal because they are only able to provide one side of the learning structure which a child needs when it comes to socialization because they don’t have the influence of a mother and a farther and they will only know how to fit in with either men or women…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of family diversity suggests that there is no dominate type of family, therefore none can be considered as the norm. However there are studies to suggest that in historical periods of Britain like when it was industrializing there is dominating types, in this period it was considered to be the nuclear family.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However it then changed again in the year 2000’s when employment started to increase, therefore meaning that people could live on their own and not have to rely on other people for financial and emotional backing, they could be more independent which would encourage a single-person household.Family diversity is something that by some people could be considered as a good thing, but by others a bad thing. Views that see family diversity as a good thing is the post-modernist view. This post-modern view is however disagreed with by Functionalists theories and New Right theories. Firstly, functionalists believe that family diversity is a bad thing in society. For example, Robert Chester see’s family diversity as a bad thing because in his eyes, the nuclear family is most important and due to diversity, the nuclear family rate is decreasing. However Chester does recognise that traditional nuclear family has been changed into a more neo-conventional family in which both spouses go out to work and the division of labour is more equal and shared. Chester argues that ‘family diversity’ is being exaggerated and it is more about lifecycle than people choosing the type of family they want to be in. He believes that everybody still aspires to be in a nuclear…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As an institution, the family has constantly evolved, shaped and adapted to social changes, and although families have much in common, there is no longer such a thing as a typical family in the 21st Century. When people talk about the family, undoubtedly many think of the “conventional” nuclear family. However, stereotypical images of mother, father and children rarely holds true to modern families. The family, which has undergone a major transformation from the past generation, is poised to continue to change even more as time progresses. Family and household structures are becoming more diverse with co-habitation, common-law arrangements, single parents and gay adoption all becoming increasingly common types of family units in the world today.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rapport argue there’s many more factors causing more family diversity and how this means the nuclear family isn’t necessarily the norm and that this diversity represents a greater freedom of choice and acceptance of cultures. For example cultural diversity, they say is that different cultures, religions and ethnic groups all have different structures living in the UK, an example of this would be Indian ethnic groups being a largely extended family and African-Caribbean households are mainly headed by women. They also argue that the nuclear family is not the norm now because of life-stage diversity. This means that family structures differ depending on the stage in their life reached, for example newlyweds with no children aren’t a nuclear family nor is a retired couple with independent children living away from home or widows/widowers living alone, even though they may have been a nuclear family at one point, they aren’t anymore because of the stage in their life reached. Another reason Rapport argues is of organisational diversity. Referring to different family roles, such as joint conjugal roles and two wage earners, meaning the males and females have equality in their relationships and both go out to work, meaning they can’t have the typical expressive and instrumental roles seen in a…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics