Preview

Use of Force Terrorism and International Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Use of Force Terrorism and International Law
Title of the Paper: Use of Force, Terrorism and International Law
Author : Rishav Banerjee
Designation : Student, Third Year, B.A.L.L.B (Hons.)
University : Gujarat National Law University, India.
Address : 6/11, GNLU Student Hostel Gujarat National Law University E-4, GIDC, Electronic Estate Sector- 26, Gandhinagar- 382028 Gujarat, India.
Phone Number : +91-9974421458; +91-9274579804.
Email Address : rishavban@gmail.com

Use of Force, Terrorism and International Law
Abstract

There exist today a number of conventions aimed at combating terrorism. These treat acts of terrorism as criminal acts. However, the events of 11 September 2001 introduced a new dimension into the debate on the use of force in addressing the problem of terrorism. This article discusses what is terrorism, its various interpretations, the United Nations Security Council Resolutions and whether the use of force can be justified under the right of self- defence. However, it is important to remember that acts of terrorism ought as far as possible to be addressed through criminal prosecution. Furthermore, any use of force ought to take place under the control of the UN. And we must be on our guard against any erosion of the prohibition against the use of force in international law.

Use of Force, Terrorism and International Law
By
Rishav Banerjee

International law, as commonly understood, consists of a body of rules governing the relations between states. It is a system of jurisprudence which for the most part has evolved out of the experiences and the necessities of situations that have arisen or time to time. It has developed with the progress of civilization. Thus international law
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bus 378 Week 3
    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bus 378 Week 3

    International law is a body of laws, regulations, and accepted practices by which different nations throughout the world interact with each other as well as with their own citizens and citizens of other countries. There are two basic categories of International Law, public International Law and private International Law, although the two tend to overlap frequently. Public International Law deals with relationships between different nations or between a nation and persons from another country. Private International Law generally deals with individual concerns, such as civil or human rights issues, not only between a government and its own citizens but also in how its citizens are treated by other nations.…

    • 3675 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Just And Unjust Wars
    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Summary Of Just And Unjust Wars

    EXPOSITION The justification of war — both in terms of jus in bello and jus ad bellum — is a difficult and complex task. This difficulty is increased immensely when trying to apply just war principles to terrorism, a complicated mix of typical and unconventional tactics that can be performed by both established and state governments. In the essay, I will critically address the discussion of terrorism by Michael Walzer in chapter 12 of “Just and Unjust Wars” (1977) and advocate for the justification of revolutionary terrorism. Walzer’s judgment of terrorism oversimplifies and neglects important complexities that must be considered in the ethical analysis of terrorism.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Coady's Essay 'Tactical Definition Of Terrorism'
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Coady's Essay 'Tactical Definition Of Terrorism'

    The tactical definition of terrorism in Coady’s essay is the organized use of violence to target non-combatants for political purposes. Non-combatants are any person’s that do not directly coherence with the agents of aggression. The just war tradition tells us the conditions under which it can be right to resort to war (jus ad bellum) and to guide us in the permissible methods by which we should wage a legitimate war (jus in bello). Given the just war tradition and the tactical definition of terrorism, terrorism is morrally wrong. In addition, the supreme emergency must be accounted for. The definition of supreme emergency allows for the violation of the normal immunity of terrorism to be permissible in warfare, though only with a heavy burden of remorse. However, the theory of supreme emergency suffers from grave defects whether it is offered as an exemption on behalf of a state, or some less established political community, or a group claiming to represent either.Therefore, all forms of terrorism and their exemptions are morally wrong.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    War on Terroism paperfinal 2 1

    • 1679 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War on Terroism paperfinal 2 1

    When analyzing the world's current situation concerning terrorism, it is difficult to say whether the global war on terrorism has been a successful one. Since the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Centers in New York City, George Bush, former president of the United States, vowed to defeat terrorism. Moreover, to entirely grasp the subject, one must be familiar with the definition of terrorism and it can be defined as an act of violence or threatened violence intended to spread panic in a society, and to bring about political change. Terrorists do not necessarily live in their native states, majority migrate to neighboring countries, and countries and often go undetected. The logistics and man power it takes to combat terrorism is immense, and it seems more evident that the global war on terrorism is not succeeding due to essentially three factors. First, that The United States has created a terrorist haven in the Middle East. Second, international support for the global war on terrorism is decreasing. Third, terrorism has been on the constant increase since 911. Sept 11, 2001 changed the world forever because the attack on the two most powerful economic symbols which was the Twin Towers World Trade Center and the Pentagon.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ch 21 Vocab
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ch 21 Vocab

    12. international law- a body of rules established by custom or treaty and recognized by nations as binding in their relations with one another.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    9/11, 2001: Acts Of Terrorism Against The United States
    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9/11, 2001: Acts Of Terrorism Against The United States

    The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, were acts of terrorism against the United States and its allies. These attacks killed thousands of people, and left the United States in disbelief. Compared to previous history, international terrorism is different in many ways. We cannot win a war solely on military might. United States must fight terrorist organizations, networks, and anyone who wishes to put fear in people around the world. However, the United States must be prepared to respond and fight malicious acts and beliefs that threaten and destroy our American ways of life. In this paper, I will discuss how counter terrorism policy program works, implementation of laws and regulations, and logic diagram. Nevertheless, counter terrorism…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Has the Nature of Terrorism Changed over the Last Thirty Years?
    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Has the Nature of Terrorism Changed over the Last Thirty Years?

    This essay will endeavour to give an historical analysis of contemporary terrorism and its changing nature by focusing on three specific terrorist campaigns over the last thirty years. The essay will begin by first presenting a definition of terrorism and will move on to provide a brief account of the geographical shift in terrorism by discussing the movement from territorial based terrorism to more ideological focused campaigns. In addition, it will give a concise discussion on the theory of globalisation in relation to terrorism and the impact it has had on the growth of international terrorism. The essay will then move on to discuss three separate but equally significant terrorist campaigns within the last thirty years and will highlight how each of these terrorist campaigns became turning points in the evolution of international terrorism and evaluate how each one played a significant role in the evolution of contemporary terrorism. The three individual campaigns this paper will focus on is the 1979 Iranian revolution, the Russian intervention in Afghanistan and the September 11 attacks instigated by Al- Qaeda; this essay will highlight the importance of each of the afore mentioned terrorist campaigns and also the scale of impact they each had on international terrorism. The importance of the question this paper will endeavour to address is that terrorism is a major issue of contemporary societal life; this paper will demonstrate how terrorism is a borderless, faceless threat and as the nature of terrorism changes so too does the extremity and lethality.…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press
    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press

    In his article “Terrorism,” Michael Walzer describes terrorism as the indiscriminate murder of innocent people. He goes on to explain that terrorists have the objective of destroying the morale of a nation and instilling fear within a society by not targeting a specific group of people, but rather, targeting the population as a whole and killing “random” people. Walzer and many like-minded philosophers share the view that terrorism is wrong and is not justified under any circumstances; thus rendering it akin to murder. The preceding view is referred to as the “the dominant view,” as labeled by Lionel K. McPherson, because it is common to a great deal of people – many of who are not philosophers. McPherson attempts to discredit the notion that terrorism is wrong by relating it to modern warfare and showing the ways in which it is better in comparison. After reading the opposing arguments presented by Walzer and McPherson, I will be proving that although terrorism is not as immoral as war, it is still wrong.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Justifiable Terrorism in Total Wars
    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justifiable Terrorism in Total Wars

    The word ‘terrorism’ instantly makes people shudder; the negative connotations and controversies surrounding terrorism in modern society are enough to spark a discussion of whether it is justifiable or not. In order to determine whether or not terrorism can be justified, a clear definition must be decided upon. Decades before the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, the definition of the word terrorism was hard to define. Political figures around the globe argued and disagreed on what they thought should have determined the act of terrorism.1 Now, there are multiple different definitions originating from distinct cultures and societies, suggesting that terrorism is in the eye of the victim. One definition of terrorism is “any violent or criminal act planned for a political or ideological purpose2”; while another claims that terrorism is understood to be a direct attack on innocents3. Since both of these definitions have important components to them, it can be assumed that both traits are essential to defining terrorism. For the purpose of this paper, the definition of terrorism will be understood as ‘a violent attack on innocents for the purpose of political change’. It can be hard for most people to understand the act of injuring and/or killing hundreds, or maybe even tens of thousands of people, as justifiable. However, if the innocents are seen as legitimate targets, the violent acts of terrorism can be carried out without justification. In order for innocent people to be perceived as legitimate targets or combatants, there must be a defined situation of total war. Total war is a type of warfare where a state or a nation battling and fighting with another, mobilizing all accessible resources and population to aid in the battles and the overall victory. For example, during World War II, all countries involved were deploying their civilian…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ultimate Sacrifice Research Paper
    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Ultimate Sacrifice Research Paper

    Violence used as a solution to injustice is only acceptable when it is necessary to prevent innocent people from being harmed from a threat such as terrorism. In order to stop terrorists from causing mass destruction to our country, we must act fast. Terrorists not only cause destruction, but they also affect innocent people who aren’t even involved with the problems the terrorists may have. To stop them quickly and not let them become even more dominate by attacking again, we must use violence.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is War The Right Way
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is War The Right Way

    Why do people resort to such violent acts as bombing, assassinations, and hi-jacking? How do individuals and organizations justify these acts of terror? These acts can be described as terrorist actions. Terrorism is a growing international problem. During the last twenty years, new terrorist groups have sprung up all over the world. Governments have had little success in their attempts to resolve issues in which terrorism is used.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of Australian Government's Response To Terrorism
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Importance Of Australian Government's Response To Terrorism

    The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, highlight terrorism as an ongoing contemporary legal issue. This results in a new emphasis for domestic and international responses as governments can implement new legislation considering the rule of law and interagency cooperation through non-legal measures. Such responses will aim to ensure the security for its citizens. I will focus on the Australian government’s response both domestically and internationally to the threat of terrorism, as well as, considering international responses to terrorism that will offer a global perspective on this World Order issue.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Origin of Terrorism
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Origin of Terrorism

    Terrorism involves activities such as assassinations, bombings, random killings, hijackings, and skyjackings. It is used for political, not military, purposes, and by groups too weak to mount open assaults. Terrorism reaches back to ancient Greece and has occurred throughout history. In the 20th cent. acts of terrorism have been associated with the Italian Red Brigades, the Irish Republican Army, the Palestine Liberation Organization, Peru 's Shining Path, and the Weathermen among many groups. It is a modern tool of the alienated and its psychological impact on the public has increased because of extensive coverage by the media. Governments find terrorism difficult to prevent; international agreements to tighten borders or return terrorists for trial may offer some deterrence. In 1999 the UN Security Council unanimously called for better international cooperation in fighting terrorism and asked governments not to aid terrorists.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Should the Defence Power, S51, Be Interpreted in an Age of Terrorism
    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Should the Defence Power, S51, Be Interpreted in an Age of Terrorism

    A law in relation to defence requires a test of proportionality, so that law-making channels are seen as being able to be “reasonably appropriate and adapted to the purpose of defence”[4]. Thus, in attempting to determine the correct application of the defence power in the current political climate, one must contemplate all facts and circumstances surrounding the threat of terrorism before coming to a conclusion. One must also look back through the history of the defence power to decipher the correct proportional means by which it is applied.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Terrorism Justified ?
    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Terrorism Justified ?

    Is terrorism ever justifiable ? The answer is no, terrorism is never justifiable. I will argue that terrorism is not justifiable because it does not contribute to a goal of a more peaceful society. Terrorism contributes to conflict, no matter what reason is used to legitimize it. But in order to argue that terrorism is unjustifiable I must first decide on a definition of terrorism. This definition encompasses all the acts that we would determine as terrorism. This includes acts that one side would label as “freedom fighting” and another would label as terrorism. Terrorism is violence set against non-combatants in order to intimidate a side to submit to a particular goal. For something to be justifiable, it needs to be morally right and it can never be morally right to intimidate people with violence whose sole purpose is to shock, intimidate and/or cause fear.…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics