Preview

Us Marine Pacific Shift

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Us Marine Pacific Shift
SHIFT OF US MARINE PRIORITIES FROM ATLANTIC TO ASIA PACIFIC REGION – IMPLICATIONS FOR PAKISTAN

INTRODUCTION
1. As per the new global strategy of American imperialism, the United States will deploy the majority of its naval forces to the Asia-Pacific region over the next decade, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced in a speech to a security conference in Singapore on june 2012. The move is part of a major shift in the global strategy of American imperialism that puts China at the top of the US target list.
2. The mobilization of warships will be accompanied by an increase in the number of military exercises conducted by the Pentagon in the region, involving air, sea and land forces. Most will be carried out in conjunction with countries that are openly or tactically allied with the US against China, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and the Philippines.

BACKGROUND
3. US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta was on a nine-day tour of Asia which included visits to Singapore, Vietnam, India and Afghanistan. On 31st May, Leon Panetta disclosed the naval plans in an address to an annual international security conference in Singapore. He emphasized that USA is moving away from the Cold War strategy where you build permanent bases and basically impose our power on the region. USA would be moving toward an innovative and creative relationship. He highlighted that the future U.S. presence in Asia would look very different than the deployments of decades past and he clarified that the USA is not trying to contain China in any regard and rejected that view entirely. The efforts to renew and intensify the involvement in Asia are fully compatible keeping in view the development and growth of China.

US NAVY – BACKGROUND AND PRESENT MARITIME STRATEGY
4. US Navy is larger then the next 13 largest navies combined in terms of battle fleet tonnage The U.S. Navy also has the world 's largest carrier fleet, with 10 in service, one under construction (two



Bibliography: 1. www.wikipedia.com 2. www.bing.com 3. Defence journals 4. Defence Reviews 5. Defence Blog US-Army

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1775-1815: A Case Study

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Beginning in 1775, the United States, just starting to fight for its freedom, did not even have one central navy. By the end of 1815, the US had established its navy as one of the best and it was finally respected around the world. The United States would not have survived as a nation had the navy not been built up. It was a progression over 40 years with several wars and conflicts that led the Americans to have to develop naval power.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blue Chromite Training

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the current times there are possible threats to the USA Military Bases, moreover the strategy to have shore operations to protect the bases and continue US Navy world domination.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was a leader in the victorious coalition, with the greatest economy and military power in the world. The U.S. Navy was larger than the one combined of every combatant nation, having more than 70% of the naval strength. “American ships, planes, and tanks were among the most reliable and effective in the world and were supported by a supply system unrivaled on the planet. The U.S. Army, ranked 17th in size in 1939, grew to more than 8 million soldiers and 90 combat divisions. The Army Air Forces boasted 80,000 aircraft.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vera Cruz Research Paper

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Through the test of time, the military has transformed and improved as new lessons have been learned and as new technology has been implemented. The Navy has been the backbone of America’s fighting capability since its founding on October 13, 1775. Throughout its history, the fleet has served as a means of offensive and defensive power for the nation. Its versatility has allowed for the protection and growth of American land, commerce, and prestige. The Battle of Vera Cruz, Hampton Roads, and Manila Bay were essential to the rise of the United States of America because the battles demonstrated the importance of Army-Navy cooperation, technological adaptation, and military preparation.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1994 Dbq Outline

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Main Idea: America must respond to expansionism in the Pacific by other countries by strengthening its great sea power.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marine Military Strategy

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is important to note the United States naval maritime strategy and understand the USMC’s role in it. Maritime strategy involves six key elements: forward presence, deterrence, sea control, power projection, maritime security, and humanitarian assistance and disaster response (Navy 19). Maritime forces are the initial line of defense with their rapid ability to deploy anywhere. With over seventy percent of the Earth’s surface as water, over…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the Navy has changed over time because of technology but several aspects of sea power remain relevant today. Historical naval forces roles included protecting commerce and defeating enemy navies. Now naval forces roles focus on power projection, supporting ground and air forces, and defeating enemy naval forces. The changes in roles and technology have affected how naval forces are configured, available firepower and where they can deploy but with minimal changes of how they are deployed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Harding, Harry, July 4, 2009, “Change and Continuity in the Obama Administration’s Foreign Policy”, Think About Asia, http://thinkingaboutasia.blogspot.com/2009/07/change-and-continuity-in-obama.html…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1994 Dbq Apush

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States has progressed economically and as a result methods of expansionism have evolved but it also tried to stay with the ideals of the forefathers. In Document C the importance of naval power is expressed and it outlines the obligations: the protection of the chief harbors by fortification and coast-defense ships, the naval force, the arm of offensive power which alone enables a country to extend its influence outward, and that no foreign state should henceforth acquire a coaling position within three thousand miles of San Francisco. In Document E Naval dominance in the Pacific Ocean is further stated by Senator Albert J. Beveridge in his speech to the 56th Congress. It states “The Pacific is our ocean…And the Pacific is the ocean of the commerce of the future…The power that rules the Pacific, therefore, is the power that rules the world.” America began expanding to find markets for our ever-growing production. Once it had conquered the continental United States, it had the ambition to take on the world, as well as a faith in God that expanded. The United States could withstand the competition involved in economic world dominance because of the acquisition of a naval power. This is shown in Document G; the cartoon of American Diplomacy in 1900. Uncle Sam is standing at the forefront of China’s open door holding the key which represents American Diplomacy. The Roosevelt Corollary was the most important departure from past United States expansionism it made the acquisition of…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    + The higher the tension between the U.S and Japan, the more the U.S spends on its navy strength.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Ww2

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two strongest countries in the world, and they didn’t want to war, so the National Security Council: use military force to “contain” communist expansionism…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mahan’s intent is extremely conspicuous and he offers little qualification about his desire to increase the size and relevance the US Navy to achieve the interests of the state; however his theories are largely insufficient when examining a large amount of technological, geographic, and strategic factors. In his words, “Naval strategy has indeed for its end to found, support, and increase, as well in peace as in war, the sea power of a country.” He offers no scientific validity to his assumptions and prepositions, only that history has shown with clarity in specific circumstances that naval power has been decisive to achieve the ends of the state. Mahan saw limited utility in naval bombardment, amphibious operations, or operations other…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Grand Strategy?

    • 8589 Words
    • 35 Pages

    When my colleagues Paul Kennedy, Charlie Hill, and I first began talking about setting up a grand strategy course at Yale in the late 1990s, at least half the people to whom we tried to explain this thought we were talking about “grant” strategy: how do you get the next federal or foundation grant? This misunderstanding would not have occurred, I think, during the fifty years of insecurity that separated the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December, 1941, from the final collapse of the Soviet Union in December, 1991. We had a grand strategy for fighting World War II already in place at the time of Pearl Harbor – go after Germany first – and with adjustments we stuck to it throughout that conflict. We had, in containment, a grand strategy for fighting the Cold War worked out within the first five years of that conflict – some would say earlier. With adjustments, we held on to that strategy for the next four decades, despite the confusions generated by our domestic politics, our relations with allies, and at least one grievous miscalculation of fundamental interests, which was the war in Vietnam. We maintained purpose and direction during those dangerous years because we had to. For as Dr. Samuel Johnson once put it: “Depend on it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.” Now, maybe historians of some distant future will conclude that the United States has been equally adept at framing and sustaining grand strategies during the two decades that have passed since the Cold War ended. Revisionist ingenuity is always surprising. But I have difficulty right now seeing how that argument is going to be made. Consider the record. The administration of George H. W. Bush, facing the most favorable prospects ever for the use of American power in the international arena, spoke grandly of building a…

    • 8589 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 1950, the US secretary of state, Dean Acheson, did not include South Korea in his list of countries that the USA would automatically defend against any communist aggression in his Defence Perimeter speech. Truman supported him in believing this mainland Asia was outside the USA’s Pacific defensive perimeter. It had been argued that since Korea was not mentioned as within the defence perimeter, it convinced the communists that the US was not ‘interested’ in defending South Korea. Hence,…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richelman, J (1999) China and the United States: From Hostility to Engagement. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from website: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB19/…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics