Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Us Coking Coal Specifications.Pdf

Satisfactory Essays
1294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Us Coking Coal Specifications.Pdf
High Vol Petro Analysis Coal Analysis As Received Dry Basis % Moisture 7.52 xxxxxx % Ash 5.10 5.51 0.79 % Sul 0.86 %Volatile 37.35 34.54 Fixed Carbon 57.14 52.84 13,522 BTU/lb 14,622 MAF BTU 15,475 FSI 7 Oxidation 96 ____________________________________________________________

____________ CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Date sampled: 09-Mar 11 MACERAL COMPOSITION VOLUME%

REACTIVES V-Types

7

8 9 10

7.3

36.4 20.5 2.0 66.2 0.0 3.4

VITRINITE EXINITE RESINITE Semifusinite INERTS

3.8 Total Reactives 73.4

Semifusinite Micrinite Fusinite Mineral Matter Total Inerts

9.7 3.2

6.7 7.0 26.6 0.88

MEAN MAXIMUM VITRINITE REFLECTANCE % Composition Balance Index Calculated Stability

Rank (Strength) Index

1.00
3.32

42

Ash % (dry) Sulfur % (dry)

Volatile Matter % (dry) Volatile Matter, daf

5.51 0.85

37.35
39.53

Mid Vol Petro Analysis
DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: PROXIMATE ANALYSIS: Moisture % Volatile Matter % Ash % Fixed Carbon % BTU/lb Calories/Gram Sulfur % FREE SWELLING INDEX: OXIDATION: %T SULFUR FORMS: Pyritic % Sulfate % Organic % TOTAL % FUSION TEMP. (F): Initial Softening (H-W) Hemispherical (H-1/2W)

March 9, 2011 March 9, 2011 AS REC’D 7.28 25.45 8.78 58.49 13,053 7252 0.79 8.0 96.3 DRY BASIS PETROGRAPHIC DATA (MACERAL ANALYSIS) VITRINITE TYPE V-8 V-9 V-10 V-11 V-12 V-13 V-14 V-15 V-16 V-17 Vitrinite Exinite Resinite Samifusinite TOTAL REACTIVES Samifusinite Micrinite Fusinite Mineral Matter TOTAL INERTS Composition Balance Index Rank Index Mean-Max Reflectance Calculated Stability Factor SOLE HEATED OVEN: (52/2) % Moisture % - 6 Mesh BDT ET Contraction 52/2 DRY BASIS: 27.45 9.47 63.08 14,078 7821 0.86 MAF MINERAL ANALYSIS: Silicon Dioxide SiO2 Aluminum Oxide Al2O3 Iron Oxide Fe2O3 Calcium Oxide CaO Magnesium Oxide MgO Sodium Oxide Na2O Potassium Oxide K2O Titanium Dioxide TiO2 Phos. Pentoxide P2O5 Sulfur Trioxide SO3 DRY BASIS 55.75 26.81 7.39 1.70 1.03 0.56 2.59 1.33 0.37 1.27

15,551

REDUCING

OXIDIZING

ULTIMATE ANALYSIS: Carbon % Hydrogen % Nitrogen % Oxygen % Ash % Sulfur % TOTAL % GIESELER FLUIDITY: Max. Fluidity (ddpm) Max Fluid Temp Initial Softening Temp. Solidification Temp Temperature Range ARNU DILATATION % Maximum Contraction % Maximum Dilatation Initial Softening Temp Initial Dilatation Temp Final Dilatatiion Temp CALCULATED CSR: Respectfully Submitted *Corrected to 2.5 G Air Dried Coal and 4.00 MM Tube Radius 2 018 440 403 487 84 27 40* 392 429 474

% REACTIVES 4.80 19.00 10.90 2.00 1.40 0.70 5.40 8.80 10.90 4.10 68.00 2.10 1.10 2.00 73.20 % INERTS 5.80 10.60 4.90 5.50 26.80 1.37 5.24 1.25 62

Low Vol Petro Analysis
DATE SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: March 9, 2011 March 9, 2011 AS REC’D 10.02 16.03 6.29 67.66 0.78 DRY BASIS: 17.82 6.99 75.19 0.83 8.0 99.8 DRY BASIS MINERAL ANALYSIS: Silicon Dioxide SiO2 Aluminum Oxide Al2O3 Iron Oxide Fe2O3 Calcium Oxide CaO Magnesium Oxide MgO Sodium Oxide Na2O Potassium Oxide K2O Titanium Dioxide TiO2 Phos. Pentoxide P2O5 Sulfur Trioxide SO3 Undetermined DRY BASIS 54.43 26.18 8.77 1.43 1.18 0.53 2.80 1.21 0.67 0.93

PROXIMATE ANALYSIS: Moisture % Volatile Matter % Ash % Fixed Carbon % BTU/lb Sulfur % FREE SWELLING INDEX: OXIDATION: %T SULFUR FORMS: Pyritic % Sulfate % Organic % TOTAL % FUSION TEMP. (F): Initial Softening (H-W) Hemispherical (H-1/2W) ULTIMATE ANALYSIS: Carbon % Hydrogen % Nitrogen % Oxygen % Ash % Sulfur % TOTAL % GIESELER FLUIDITY: Max. Fluidity (ddpm) Max Fluid Temp Initial Softening Temp. Solidification Temp Temperature Range ARNU DILATATION % Maximum Contraction % Maximum Dilatation Initial Softening Temp Initial Dilatation Temp Final Dilatatiion Temp CALCULATED CSR: Respectfully Submitted

REDUCING

OXIDIZING

PETROGRAPHIC DATA (MACERAL ANALYSIS) VITRINITE TYPE V-14 V-15 V-16 V-17 Vitrinite Exinite Resinite Samifusinite TOTAL REACTIVES Samifusinite Micrinite Fusinite Mineral Matter TOTAL INERTS Composition Balance Index Rank Index Mean-Max Reflectance Calculated Stability Factor SOLE HEATED OVEN: (52/2 % Moisture % - 6 Mesh BDT ET Contraction 52/2

% REACTIVES 3.60 34.30 19.70 15.30 72.90 0.00 0.00 1.40 74.30 % INERTS 5.50 7.90 8.30 4.00 25.70 3.63 7.10 1.61 52 3.93 79.3 52.4 +11.7 +13.2

189 476 439 509 70 20 97* 415 451 487 49.0

*Corrected to 2.5 G Air Dried Coal and 4.00 MM Tube Radius

Mine & Sample Information Coal Source Seams Date Identification Averages Sample Date: March 9, 2011 Moisture Moisture Equilibrium Moisture 5.57 1.25 17.48 7 75.53 0.66 18.81 14,660 85.02 4.37 1.24 7 0.66 1.73 0.03

Std Dev

0.32 0.07 1.36 1.14 2.5 1.69 204.35 1.72 0.21 0.13 1.14 0.65 0.01

Proximate Analysis (dry basis) Volatile Matter Ash Fixed Carbon Sulfur Volatile Matter dry, Calorific Value BTU/lb (dry basis) Ultimate Analysis (dry basis) Carbon Hydrogen Nitrogen Ash Sulfur Oxygen Chlorine Phosphrous Forms of Sulfur Sulfate Pyritic Organic Physical Characteristics FSI Hardgrove Grindability Grindability Moisture Oxidation Index (% T Ash Chemistry (% of ash) SiO2 Al2O3 TiO2 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O

0.01 0.12 0.53 7.8 101 0.69 97 50.24 28.82 1.43 10.09 2.56 1.42 1.75

0.01 0.01 0.35 141 0.05 1.41 0.7 0.83 0.01 1.2 0.31 0.06 0.6

Na2O SO3 P2O5 SrO BaO Mn3O4 Undetermined Ash Analysis Total Alkali in Ash (% Base/Acid Ratio Silica Percentage Slag Viscosity at 260 Alkall Index Rheology Gieseler Plastometer Softening Temperature Max Fludity Temperature Solidification Temperature Plastic Range Maximum Fluidity Arnu Dilatometer Maximum Contraction Maximum Expansion Softening Temperature Temperature of Max Temperature of Max

0.55 2.53 0.05 0.15 0.26 0.05 0.14 2.29 0.2 78.14 481 1.44

0.06 0.43 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.1 0.54 0.02 2 126.54 0.13

438 478 507 69 93 20 61 436 463 496 2.685 2.700 2.700 2.700

2.12 2.12 4.24 12.73 0.71 3.54 1.41 3.54 1.41 21.21

Ash Fusion Temperature Initial Deformation Softening ST (red.) Hemispherical HT Fluid FT (red)

Petrography Petrographic Indicies Mean Maximum Refl 1.69 Standard Deviation 0.0512 Distribution of Vitrinite Types (100% basis) V-10 V-11 V-12 V-13 V-14 V-15 7.5 V-16 47.5 V-17 45 V-18 V-19 Maceral Analysis

0.03

4.95 20.51 25.46

Vitrinite Liptinite

69.3 0.2 Semi-inert Macerals Semi-fusinite 19.5 Inert Macerals Oxyvitrinite 0.3 Fusinite 7.9 Inertodetrinite 2.3 Micrinite 0.5 Macrinite Reality Checks Ash Volitile Matter Fixed Carbon Volatile Matter (dry Carbon (dry ash free Hydrogen (dry ash free Nitrogen (dry ash free Oxygen (dry ash free Rank DAF Carbon to Rank DAF Hydrogen to Ra Gieseler Plastic Ran Gieseler Maximum F Arnu Dilation 7 17.48 75.52 18.8 91.42 4.7 1.33 1.86 1.69 54.09 2.78 69 93 60.5

8.06 3.82 0.14 3.25 0.71 0.14

1.14 1.36 2.5 1.69 0.73 0.16 0.16 0.72 0.03 1.34 0.14 4.24 12.73 3.54

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    These samples were annealed in an air atmosphere furnace for one hour at 500° C.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab 2 Study of Minerals

    • 316 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12. For each mineral below, list at least one diagnostic property. (Refer to Fig. 1.23 or Fig. 1.24)…

    • 316 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chemistry

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Complete a data table that includes a prediction of reaction type (single replacement, double replacement, synthesis, decomposition, or combustion), observations, and identification of reaction type for each reaction in the lab. (10 points)…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bio 101

    • 24956 Words
    • 100 Pages

    If you have any questions or concerns, refer to the Material Safely Data Sheets (MSDS)…

    • 24956 Words
    • 100 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rosebud Coal Breaks

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The lab prepared coal samples for Rosebud Coal identified as KDBH weekly Truck samples. The daily samples are subdivided into four splits. One of these daily split samples is combined with the other daily split samples (in this case, five days) to create a weekly composite. A split of the composite sample (here designated as “split A”) are forwarded by the lab to Coaltech for petrographic analysis. Split B is pulverized to 60M and analyzed by the lab. The fourth split (designated here a split D) is discarded.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SCI203 Phase 3 Lab Report

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For this lab I utilized information taken from the M.U.S.E as well as information gleaned from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The chart below an information gathered for the…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Coal Commission, Report, 5 parts, Senate Document 195, 68th Congress, Second Session. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office,…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Preliminary Analysis

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    sample was once living. There is a significant difference in dry weight and ash weight for these samples,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2b). Manganese was with high concentration in the exchangeable fraction, except between 18 and 14 cm where it showed less concentration. Manganese in carbonate and organic bound fractions was almost constant with depth, except higher value at 30 and 18 cm, respectively. Manganese in the Fe-Mn oxide phase showed slight increase from the bottom to 30 cm which was followed by a sharp decrease at 18 cm. Further, it maintained low concentration up to 10 cm and showed slightly higher values from 8 cm to surface. Sum of the bio-available phases was higher in the lower part of the core from bottom to 30 cm. From 14 cm to surface, bio-available Mn increased towards the surface. Nickel exhibited an increase in the bio-available fractions from the bottom to 18 cm. It was highest and constant between 18 and 14 cm, and then gradually decreased towards the surface. Cobalt in the exchangeable fraction increased from the bottom to 18 cm and then showed overall decrease towards the surface. Its concentration in both exchangeable and carbonate fractions was much higher between 18 and 14 cm. In the Fe-Mn oxide fraction, it decreased from the bottom to 8 cm followed by an increase towards the surface. Cobalt exhibited very high concentration at 8 cm in the organic phase. Chromium showed overall an increase from the bottom to 14 cm in exchangeable, carbonate and organic phases and then exhibited overall decrease towards the surface. The organic and Fe-Mn oxide phases showed slightly higher values between 18 and 14…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3) "Air Quality Factsheet - Carbon Monoxide (CO." Department of the Environment and Heritage. 17 Dec. 2005 .…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Class Work

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) Due to the recent increase in the price of natural gas, the quantity of coal demanded by electric power generation plants has increased. Based on this information, coal and natural gas are.....…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    NMR Spectroscopy

    • 4135 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Sample 40 has been provided with sample information stating; an Infrared reading of 3350 / 1040 cm-1, a boiling point ranging between +107⁰C and +109⁰C,…

    • 4135 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Friction

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coefficient - μs Clean and Dry Surfaces Lubricated and Greasy Surfaces Aluminum Aluminum 1.05 - 1.35 0.3 Aluminum- bronze Steel 0.45 Aluminum Mild Steel 0.61 Brake material Cast iron 0.4 Brake material Cast iron (wet) 0.2 Brass Steel 0.35 0.19 Brass Cast Iron 0.31) Brick Wood 0.6 Bronze Steel 0.16 Bronze Cast Iron 0.221) Bronze - sintered Steel 0.13 Cadmium Cadmium 0.5 0.05 Cadmium Chromium 0.41 0.34 Cadmium Mild Steel 0.461) Cast Iron Cast Iron 1.1, 0.151) 0.071) Cast Iron Oak 0.491) 0.0751 Cast iron Mild Steel 0.4, 0.231) 0.21, 0.1331) Carbon (hard) Carbon 0.16 0.12 - 0.14 Carbon Steel 0.14 0.11 - 0.14 Chromium Chromium 0.41 0.34 Copper- Lead alloy Steel 0.22 Copper Copper 1 0.08 Copper Cast Iron 1.05, 0.291) Copper Mild Steel 0.53, 0.361) 0.181) Diamond Diamond 0.1 0.05 - 0.1 Diamond Metal 0.1 -…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this experiment is to allow students to understand how to differentiate physical and chemical properties and reactions of matter by observing changes of matters under circumstances. Physical properties are properties of matter that can be observed without changing the composition of the matter, including the volume, mass, color, density, and shape of it. Chemical properties include the matter’s flammability, acidity, and heat of combustion. It can only be observed through a chemical reaction. Chemical reaction is when the chemical identity of a matter is altered through reacting to another matter. There is a change in the arrangement of atoms. A lot of property changes during a chemical reaction too. Chemical reactions are also very hard to reverse. One example of chemical change is when sugar is combined with sulfuric acid. We can tell it is a chemical change because heat and bubbles are produced, and carbon was separated from the other substances. On the other hand, physical reaction only does macroscopic changes to the matter, for example, altering the shape, and painting the matter. There is not rearrangement of atoms in a physical change. Only a few properties change during a physical reaction, and they are mostly easy to reverse. One example of a physical change is mixing salt and water together. Although there is not a change in its appearance as they are all transparent liquids, the mixed salt and water can be easily separated again through boiling the mixture, making it a physical change because it is easily reversible.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3.1 Materials / Equipments - the exact technical specifications, quantities and source of method of preparation for all materials used should be given. Specifically built equipment used in the study must be described and the description accompanied…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics