Us-China Policy and China's Growing Military
INTRODUCTION
The debate on the effectiveness of the hegemon’s foreign policy in encouraging a world’s rising power’s growing military to enhance security relations with the hegemon is a matter of concern. The research study addresses the following question: How effective was U.S. foreign policy in encouraging China and it’s growing military to enhance its security relations with U.S. by military dialogue, transparency and coordination with China 2008-2012. This research question is important to address because understanding how effective U.S. foreign policy was in encouraging China and its growing military to enhance security relations by military dialogue, increased transparency and coordination with U.S. is critical outlining bilateral security relations. In addition, the questions importance is strategically based because of the growing concern the United States has of the rise of China and its rising military power pushing American influence out of East and South-East Asia. The research study argues that the U.S. foreign policy was not effective in enhancing security relations by military dialogue, increased transparency and coordination with the China between 2008-2012. Moreover the preliminary evidence appears to indicate that the central reason why the security relations are not enhanced through military dialogue, transparency and coordination with China is that the major steps taken by the two powers to gain a better position with regard to each other contribute to regional tension between 2008-2012. By way of organization, Section 1 is the literature review, which examines the realist and idealist models. Section 2 is the case study. Section 3 summarizes the central findings of the study.
SECTION 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
The debate on the effectiveness of the hegemon’s foreign policy in encouraging a world’s rising power’s growing military to enhance security relations with the rising hegemon is a matter of concern. By way of
The debate on the effectiveness of the hegemon’s foreign policy in encouraging a world’s rising power’s growing military to enhance security relations with the hegemon is a matter of concern. The research study addresses the following question: How effective was U.S. foreign policy in encouraging China and it’s growing military to enhance its security relations with U.S. by military dialogue, transparency and coordination with China 2008-2012. This research question is important to address because understanding how effective U.S. foreign policy was in encouraging China and its growing military to enhance security relations by military dialogue, increased transparency and coordination with U.S. is critical outlining bilateral security relations. In addition, the questions importance is strategically based because of the growing concern the United States has of the rise of China and its rising military power pushing American influence out of East and South-East Asia. The research study argues that the U.S. foreign policy was not effective in enhancing security relations by military dialogue, increased transparency and coordination with the China between 2008-2012. Moreover the preliminary evidence appears to indicate that the central reason why the security relations are not enhanced through military dialogue, transparency and coordination with China is that the major steps taken by the two powers to gain a better position with regard to each other contribute to regional tension between 2008-2012. By way of organization, Section 1 is the literature review, which examines the realist and idealist models. Section 2 is the case study. Section 3 summarizes the central findings of the study.
SECTION 1: LITERATURE REVIEW
The debate on the effectiveness of the hegemon’s foreign policy in encouraging a world’s rising power’s growing military to enhance security relations with the rising hegemon is a matter of concern. By way of
Bibliography: 28. Richard Stengel. "In Search of Pragmatic Idealism." Time vol.177, no.13 (April 2011):6-6. This article addresses U.S. foreign policy in the revolution of Libya. The author discusses related actions being taken by President Obama. 48. Friedman, Thomas L. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. Farrar, Straus, Giroux. New York, 1999. National Defense University Press, 2013. HSDL. This study assesses the motivation and context of PRC’s use of military force since 1949. 50. Kavi Chongkittavorn “China Is Searching for New ASEAN Strategies,” Nation, vol.12, no4 (October 19, 2009): 2-3 National Defense University Press, 2013. HSDL. This study assesses the motivation and context of PRC’s use of military force since 1949. 55. Nan Li. “The Evolution of China’s Naval Strategy and Capabilities: From ‘Near Coast’ and ‘Near Seas’ to ‘Far Seas,’” Asian Security 5, no.2 (2009): 160. This study assesses the motivation and context of PRC’s use of military force since 1949. 81. Admiral William J. Fallon. commander. U.S. Pacific Command. Press Conference. Shenyang, China, (May 2006). This study assesses the motivation and context of PRC’s use of military force since 1949. 82. Garamone, Jim. “U.S., China to Move Ahead with Strategic Dialogue.” American Forces Press Service, 6 November 2007. http:bejing.usembassy-china.rog,cn/110807e.html (accessed 29 January 2009). 83. Robert M. Gates. “A Balanced Strategy.” Foreign Affairs, (January/Feburary 2009). This article is about a field experiment that was conducted to measure nationalism in incentive-compatible choices 84 86. Holly Higgins. “Applying Confidence Building Measures in a Regional Context.” Paper presented at Institute for Science and International Security, (2002). 87 88. Joseph Kahn. “China’s State Secrets Agency Will Guard One Less: Death Tolls.” The New York Times International, (Sept 2005). : This article assesses each president’s successes and failures in U.S. foreign policy from 1941-1991. 89