Unlimited Freedom Is Not a Sign of Parental Love but of Parental Neglect
UNLIMITED FREEDOM IS NOT A SIGN OF PARENTAL LOVE BUT OF PARENTAL NEGLECT
Respected judges, my worthy opponents and members of the audience- sale promos like unlimited talk time or unlimited internet access- I can acknowledge, but unlimited freedom is something I cannot fathom nor recognize. Freedom is never absolute, it always comes with responsibilities. Even the highest level of freedom has a defining boundary as without it, freedom has absolutely no purpose or function.
Thus taking unlimited freedom in its idiomatic sense, and not its literal meaning - I refute today’s topic under debate. A high degree of freedom rather than unlimited as that doesn’t exist, truly concurs as parental love.
Humans cherish freedom and thrive when properly nurtured by it. Thus every parent would like to provide a wide and extensive, boundary of what is right or wrong for a child. It’s an art and science that parents must master and use in the precise manner. The real worth of unconditional love is tested, when you tell a child what is morally unacceptable and acceptable and allow them to make their choices and stand by them irrespective of the consequences.
The freedom to stumble, fall and fail within reasonable boundaries builds resilience, inquisitiveness, confidence, courage and allows the true growth of an individual. Of course children are going to make mistakes; they are necessary in learning how to be responsible. Walking the walk - the actual experiencing of life with its highs and lows provides far more real education and wisdom than guiding and controlling or just talking the talk.
There is a stark difference between being vigilant and forbidding. Parents must encourage children's freedom to help build a strong base for future independence. In a traditional Indian scenario often kids are not given enough freedom and thus don't have a chance to practice with it. So when they do have to make a decision, it may be the wrong one.
Healthy communication is at the
Respected judges, my worthy opponents and members of the audience- sale promos like unlimited talk time or unlimited internet access- I can acknowledge, but unlimited freedom is something I cannot fathom nor recognize. Freedom is never absolute, it always comes with responsibilities. Even the highest level of freedom has a defining boundary as without it, freedom has absolutely no purpose or function.
Thus taking unlimited freedom in its idiomatic sense, and not its literal meaning - I refute today’s topic under debate. A high degree of freedom rather than unlimited as that doesn’t exist, truly concurs as parental love.
Humans cherish freedom and thrive when properly nurtured by it. Thus every parent would like to provide a wide and extensive, boundary of what is right or wrong for a child. It’s an art and science that parents must master and use in the precise manner. The real worth of unconditional love is tested, when you tell a child what is morally unacceptable and acceptable and allow them to make their choices and stand by them irrespective of the consequences.
The freedom to stumble, fall and fail within reasonable boundaries builds resilience, inquisitiveness, confidence, courage and allows the true growth of an individual. Of course children are going to make mistakes; they are necessary in learning how to be responsible. Walking the walk - the actual experiencing of life with its highs and lows provides far more real education and wisdom than guiding and controlling or just talking the talk.
There is a stark difference between being vigilant and forbidding. Parents must encourage children's freedom to help build a strong base for future independence. In a traditional Indian scenario often kids are not given enough freedom and thus don't have a chance to practice with it. So when they do have to make a decision, it may be the wrong one.
Healthy communication is at the