Preview

Unlawful Arrest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unlawful Arrest
How has the implementation of Martial law impact the increase in Unlawful Arrest in the United States from 1863-2015?

Introduction In efforts to suppress wars, counter terrorism and illegal immigration, the declaration of martial law has been devised. Although its proclamation shows in favor of settling these major issues that the United States has faced over the years. However, under the assertion of martial law, it has played a major role in the vast amounts of unlawful arrest of citizens and non-citizens by the misuse of governmental powers. The affirmation of martial law impacts the increased numbers in the unlawful detainment of United States civilians.
This order which is relatively used as a means to facilitate the United States in times of difficulties and to safeguard the lives of civilians has conflicted with the traditional notion of policing under its regime. Many ordinances go into effect at the time of its implementation. For one of which is the suspension of habeas corpus. Which gives the police the authority to hold a person even if they do not have
…show more content…
This study will examine the shift in its implementation in the United States from 1863-2015. And how its change has conspired against civilian life. People have failed to recognize how its declaration can affect civilization, leading to the increase in unlawful detainment of citizens and non-citizens. Yet even so has made considerable contributions to settle disputes. Its regime has reconstructed the use of authority in society in addition alleviate complications in time of distress. Its implication can be based off existing exploitations and can undergo a change at any time. If we continue to believe that martial law efforts only improve social functions, we’ll never fully understand the larger question of how it its declaration has impacted the rise in an unlawful arrest of citizens in the United states from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Running Head: BECAUSE IT’S PROBABLE: REVIEWING PROBABLE CAUSE, WARRANTS, SEARCHES, ARRESTS, AND HOW THEY INTERTWINE.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Warren and Rehnquist and the Effects of Major Court Cases on the Law Enforcement of Today…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed to repeat history if we fail to learn from it, an examination into the circumstances of the Japanese American internment in 1942 may inform the ways to most effectively deal with the security concerns faced by Americans today.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In times of crisis, the United States has a tendency to limit the Constitutional civil liberties granted to its citizens. This has been the practice since the foundation of the country itself, seen in times of war, famine, depression, or even in times of mass-panic. However, as time progresses, the question of whether or not the restriction of rights granted in the Bill of Rights is, in fact, justified. Alan Brinkley, in both his essay Civil Liberties in Times of Crisis and his book American History: A Survey, explores the history of the suppression of freedoms during troubling times for the country. His conclusion, that the US government goes in excess what the crisis warrants while limiting liberties, is well-supported, using evidence from the “140 years of silence”, World War I, and the Red Scare to argue his…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    stop which she did have reason to do. For a traffic stop you really don’t need all…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    During America's most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictions are often placed on some of the most basic freedoms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraint is Abraham Lincoln’s precedent of suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus and issuing martial law. Lincoln’s actions clearly violated the rights of the people that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution. While out of context it wouldn’t make much sense, the specific circumstance’s Abraham Lincoln was facing completely justified his unconstitutional orders. In retrospect we can now see how important Lincoln’s decisions were; If not for his actions the union may never have won the Civil War and history would have been irreparably altered. History repeated itself when following in Lincoln’s footstep’s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of over 100,000 people of Japanese descent in response to Japan’s attacks on the Pearl Harbor Naval Base. The country was in a state of panic and a response was needed to make Americans feel secure. Less than five decades later a similar attack devastated America. Similar to Roosevelt, George W. Bush was catapulted into taking responsive action after the September 11th terrorist attacks on U.S soil. His response was the Patriot Act. It was our founding fathers intentions for the people of these United States to be sheltered by liberty and freedom, however, it’s clear that later day presidents used a strong balance of discretion and justice for the sake of a greater good and national security. The government should be able to impede certain civil liberties should the situation arise where it is necessary as long as…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the government response isn’t perfect the government is striving to make the necessary improvement to keep United States safe. The legislative passes laws and options to fight off terrorist attacks to defend innocent civilians from taking any further damage, deploying a weapons and tactics team to do the job. Legislative branch focuses on enforcing special weapon in tactics to advance towards terrorism. The legislative branch assisted a training course to provide the team proper skill against terrorism. The judicial speaks their minds and discusses different methods against terrorist intruders involving the Supreme Court ideals. The judicial branch also developed a project to support bringing terrorism to justice. Executive Director of the executive pointed out that judicial authorities interpret a critical role in the anti-terrorism and relevant international instruments played. Do, they face several challenges, especially if they were also needed to protect the human rights, including the rights of victims of terrorism and the rights of those accused of crimes related to terrorism including their right to a fair trial. Judges of the Supreme Court was responsible to ensure the legality of the national provisions transposing international standards, for the assessment of the conformity of national laws with international standards and to interpret the standards already by international courts. The executive also authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States this determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat by terrorist attackers. The executive branch takes part in a struggle with the judicial branch over the war on…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Internment

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the reasoning of the President and the federal government may seem valid, many civil and constitutional rights were violated with Executive Order 9066. Habeas corpus was a right given to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Handcuff Arrest

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How would you feel if a murderer escaped custody because he wasn't properly handcuffed and killed your family? Handcuffs are the most common form of restraint device used by law enforcement officers. Handcuffs can be made of metal or plastic. They have two hinged circles that open, then close to encircle the wrists, holding the restrained person's hands close together. The two wrist-cuffs are most commonly attached with a short length of chain, but might also be attached with a hinge or with a rigid bar. Law enforcement officers carry handcuffs on their utility belts, usually within a protective leather case (Hill). Here are some steps on how to properly arrest someone.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police History Policing

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The relationship between the government and police organizations affects police practices on a daily basis and at all levels, local and national. The Federal Government sets standard that need to be followed. An example of a Federal ruling regarding policing has much to do with the Miranda Rights. A criminal named Ernesto Miranda was let free based on Supreme Court Rule. In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court overturned his conviction and ruled that police officers had to advise suspects of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being interrogated (Walker Katz, 2011). Since then, the Miranda Rights have been a national standard that affect policing on a day to day basis. Conclusion…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homeland security has thrown of several legal issues that do not confirm with international law. For instance, an unlawful combatant is a prisoner captured by military that are not in accordance with Geneva Convention. Currently, there are weaknesses in detection of radioactive materials, bio-defense, border security, domestic intelligence and emergency prepared ness. With the improvement in each of the factors mentioned there will be substantial improvement in criminal justice. There will be better…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During our humanities week in my high school, we commemorated the 40th anniversary of Martial Law as the Social Science activity. 1 There were exhibits, rituals, talks, and many experiences shared and throughout all this, I have come to realize how lucky I am, that I have the freedom all those heroes during martial law fought for, without breaking a sweat. 2 I realized how blessed I am, that I can do what I want to do, when I want to, because of heroes who sacrificed their lives for that. 3…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays