Preview

Unitary, Federal, and Confederate Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unitary, Federal, and Confederate Government
The unitary government is described as a centralized government. It is a government which all powers held by the government belong to a single, central agency. Some advantages of a unitary government are; uniform policies, laws. Enforcement and administration throughout the country. This is an excellent trait of unitary government, there are fewer issues between national and local governments. Unitary government represents greater unity and stability. Although there are many advantages, like any government, unitary government also has it's disadvantages. Unitary government is extremely out of touch with local concerns, and is slow fixing these concerns. This means that unitary government only serves the minor problems. Confederate government is an alliance of independent states. A central organ; the confederate government has the power to handle only those matters that the member as assigned to it. Confederate governments have had limited powers and only in fields such as defense and foreign commerce. The advantages of a confederate government include its prevention of growth of a large central government do to its power at local levels. It also makes it possible for several states to cooperate in matters of common concern. The disadvantages of a confederate government makes it unable to enforce laws or collect taxes.

The federal government is a system of government where the national government and state governments share the power and derive all authority from the people. There are several advantages to having a federal government. The local government must be responsive to people who elect them. The central government can devote more time and energy to national and international problems. There are also disadvantages to having a federal government. There are duplication of services, some may be conflicted with the fact that citizens living in different parts of the country will be treated differently, not only spending welfare, but in legal systems that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A unitary system is “A system in which all authority is derived from a central authority.” According to “Bowman’s State and Local Government text book, pg. 25,” “more than 90% of the countries have a unitary system.” A unitary system is where most legal power is in the hands of the Central Government. It is considered an organization that conceals a very strong Central Government, but a very weak Local Jurisdiction. There are advantages and disadvantages of a unitary system. The advantages are 1. It helps with fewer conflicts between the National and Local Government. 2. They help carry-out greater unitary and stability. The disadvantages are 1. Slow in meeting local problems 2. They are out of touch with local concerns.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the type of government where there is segment of different powers between a state government and the central government. The United States is a federalist government where the states have their own individual powers and authority that they are able to exercise and the federal government has its own circle of authority that it tends to exercise.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism is a strong central government kept in check by smaller local governments. In the US Constitution a federal government is described with three coequal branches. The first of the coequal branches was the Legislative branch created, as the name would suggest, to form the ultimate law of the land in america. The second was the Executive branch formed as the office of America's Commander in Chief. The third branch was named the Judicial branch and forms the highest court power in the US. Each of these three coequal branches have certain checks and balances over the other two that prevent any one of them from gaining too much power.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism breaks down what National , State and local governments can and cannot do. Like the national government and only the National government has the power to tax,make treaties,coin money,establish post offices,raise a military,declare war,admit new states,build dams,interstate highways,Fund…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the idea of division of power between central and state governments (Madison Document A). In a compound government both the state and central governments must approve on the subject at hand for it too go into effect (Document A). Therefore not only one side is heard and can be made to help the people. Both governments share the powers to tax, borrow money, set up courts, make laws, and enforce laws. This provides for double security to the people because you have two different governments looking over these important powers making sure they are not misused. Federalism guards against tyranny because two separate governments are watching to make sure that the other does not become corrupt with its powers and the approval of both governments is needed to approve on matters (Document A). The state and central government are one compound government but two different distinct governments with equal…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assignment 5: U.S. History to ReconstructionIn 1861 most Southerners thought that the Confederacy was favorite to win the war. The Confederacy’s sheer size – 750,000 square miles – was a major asset, making if difficult to blockade, occupy and conquer. Confederate forces did not have to invade the North: they simply needed to defend. The fire-power of the rifle-musket meant that battlefield tactics now favored the defender. The Union, having no option but to attack, was bound to suffer heavy casualties. Southerners hoped that Northern opinion might come to question high losses. If Northern will collapsed, the Confederacy would win by default. Geography gave the Confederacy an important strategic advantage. In the crucial theatre of the war – North Virginia – a series of rivers provided a barrier to Union armies intent on capturing Richmond, the Confederate capital. Slavery, which might seem to be a Confederate weakness, enabled the South to enlist more of its white manpower than the North.…

    • 2576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism has been renovated to meet modern stability and progress. An advantage for the establishment of federalism include the closer ties between people and government…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A federal system checks the growth of tyranny, allows unity without uniformity, encourages experimentation, and keeps government closer to the people. In this system, the people are one with the government so the people like the government and it prevents chaos. In the twenty-first century,…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both sides believed that they were tasked with the protection of the ideals championed by the founding fathers that they so revered, and both claimed that they were fighting for the exact same principles. The Confederates believed that they were struggling to free themselves from the control of the bloated and ineffective Union government, while the Union believed that they were fighting to keep their country a stable and united front. The south justified their rebellion against the “tyrannical” Union by comparing it to America’s endeavor for independence from England, looking to their predecessors for strength and inspiration. They also believed that their loss would result in the subjugation of the south, and the destruction of all the institutions they held dear, such as slavery and aggressive white supremacy. In their eyes, the Union was trying to force racial integration and equality, and they decided that they would rather die than ever live in a world where black and white people are seen as…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Federalism: Simultaneous federal/national and state/local governments; 2 levels of sovereignty operating at the same time over the people (viable national government that can behave effectively for all of the people, yet the benefits of diversity and decentralization).…

    • 4617 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some portion of the debate that prompted the Civil War (1861– 1865) concerned federalism. Numerous Southerners felt that state governments alone had the power to settle on important choices, for example, whether slavery ought to be legal. Advocates of states' rights supported the individual state governments had the ;supreme law' the central government in light of the fact that the states had created the federal government through the ratification of the Constitution. Most Southern states ended up seceding from the Union since they felt that withdrawal was the best way to secure their rights. Abraham Lincoln and numerous Northerners held that the Union together; their triumph confirmed the national government's right to have control over the…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now let’s move on to creative federalism, which had a direct link to federal and local government, making it a weaker state form. Now for current federalism, the new federalism or competitive federalism. New federalism, is an overall competition of the governments in their relationships, making an overall competitive government. The many disadvantages of federal government can be summed up with it allowing inequality between states, in history it protected segregation and even slavery, and the blockage of national policies by the state. Federalism works for what it is, do I think states should have more power? Sure, but, knowing how people see their government on a state level It could be implosive. A check and balance system will always be a more logical concept then, either having…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The president had the opportunity to serve a single six year term, and was given no permission on the power of the budget, he and his cabinet would also be awarded seats in Congress. In order to guarantee Southerners their much-desired states’ rights, “the federal government had no right to levy protective tariffs, make international improvements, or over-rule state court decisions. The states had the right to sustain their own armies and enter into separate agreements with one another as well as having the power to amend the constitution. Although there was a requirement for a federal Supreme Court, the southern legislators could never agree on its arrangement or its establishment, so the Confederacy lacked a high court throughout its existence.”#…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays