Understanding Ideology Driven Organizations and Their Structure
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AHMEDABAD
Term Paper Assignment
Understanding Ideology-Driven Organizations and their Structure.
Submitted to Prof.George Kendathil & Prof. Pradhyumana Khokhle
In Partial fulfillment of the requirements of course
Organizational Behaviour-I (Macro)
Submitted on: September 20 , 2010 By
th
Abrarali Saiyed
Understanding Ideology-Driven Organizations and their Structure - Abrarali Saiyed Abstract:
Study of most organizations is based on the principles put forth by Max Webber and is applicable directly to public and private enterprises rather than the social sector organizations. Organizational structure is known to follow the strategy adopted by the organization which in turn is influenced by the ideology that the organization follows. This paper attempts to examine how the ideological structure of organizations and alternative structures of control affect different organizational interests and outputs. Two propositions are identified; the first is Organizational ideology, politics, strategy and structure have significant impacts on the NGO’s strategy formulation and implementation and the second is NGO context affects approaches to strategy formulation and implementation as well as organizational structure and relationships.
Introduction:
NGOs- Part of the Social Service Sector:
Management science attributed the study of organization to Max Weber, whose sociological agenda justified organizations as extensions of society, their organizational formats derived from religious beliefs, power and status-- organizations whose functionalism is rooted in the practical, functional disciplines that seek ways of controlling and making more efficient the organization‘s production of goods and services (Robbins 1990). Seeking the third way between government and private enterprise, the mandates of the third sector are providing services and representing the needs of civil society. Thus, the sociological and
Term Paper Assignment
Understanding Ideology-Driven Organizations and their Structure.
Submitted to Prof.George Kendathil & Prof. Pradhyumana Khokhle
In Partial fulfillment of the requirements of course
Organizational Behaviour-I (Macro)
Submitted on: September 20 , 2010 By
th
Abrarali Saiyed
Understanding Ideology-Driven Organizations and their Structure - Abrarali Saiyed Abstract:
Study of most organizations is based on the principles put forth by Max Webber and is applicable directly to public and private enterprises rather than the social sector organizations. Organizational structure is known to follow the strategy adopted by the organization which in turn is influenced by the ideology that the organization follows. This paper attempts to examine how the ideological structure of organizations and alternative structures of control affect different organizational interests and outputs. Two propositions are identified; the first is Organizational ideology, politics, strategy and structure have significant impacts on the NGO’s strategy formulation and implementation and the second is NGO context affects approaches to strategy formulation and implementation as well as organizational structure and relationships.
Introduction:
NGOs- Part of the Social Service Sector:
Management science attributed the study of organization to Max Weber, whose sociological agenda justified organizations as extensions of society, their organizational formats derived from religious beliefs, power and status-- organizations whose functionalism is rooted in the practical, functional disciplines that seek ways of controlling and making more efficient the organization‘s production of goods and services (Robbins 1990). Seeking the third way between government and private enterprise, the mandates of the third sector are providing services and representing the needs of civil society. Thus, the sociological and
References: Bordt, R. (1997). The Structure of Women 's Nonprofit Organizations, Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, Indiana. Bozeman, B., & Strausmann, J. (1984). New directions in public administration. Monterey CA: 24 | P a g e English, D. J., Upadhyaya, M. P., Litrownik, A. J., Marshall, J. M., Runyan, D. K., Graham, J. C., & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Maltreatment 's wake: The relationship of maltreatment dimensions to child outcomes. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 597-619 Drory, A Gamson, W. (1998). Social movements and cultural change: From contention to action. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, and C. Tilly (eds.). From Contention to Democracy, Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp. 57-77. Gouldner, A. (1954) Patterns of Industrial bureaucracy. New York: Free Press Geertz, C (1987). Organizations, Culture, and Ideology, Int. Studies ofMgt. & Org., Vol. XVII, No. 3. pp. Hyde, C. (1995). Feminist social movement organizations survive the new right. In M. M. Ferree and P. Y. Martin (eds.), Feminist Organizations, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp. 306-322. Kathryn T. Theus (1991) Organizational Ideology, Structure, and Communication Efficacy: A Causal Analysis, Journal of Public Relations Research, Volume 3, Issue 1 - 4 January 1991 , pages 133 - 149 Katzenstein, M Lawrence, P., Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration of complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, pp 1-47 Mats Alvesson (1987) McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, and M. Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 23-40. McCarthy, J. D. (1996). Constraints and opportunities in adopting, adapting and inventing. In D. Meyer and S. Tarrow (eds.). The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, Rowman and Littlefield, New York, pp. 195-216. Minkoff, D. (1995). Organizing For Equality: The Evolution of Women 's and Racial-Ethnic Organizations in America, 1955-1985, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Miller, D., Dorge, C. (1986), Psychological and traditional determinants of structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp 539-560 28 | P a g e Oberschall, A. (1978). Theories of social conflict. Annual Review of Sociology, 4,291-315. Perrow, C. (1967) A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Sociological Review, 32, pp 194-209 Peters, J 1993, ‗On structures‘, Management decision, vol. 31, no. 5, pp.60-62.