Preview

Two Nation Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
945 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Two Nation Theory
TWO NATION
THEORY
Muhammad Asbaq Younis

MEANING OF TWO NATION
THEORY
 The Two Nation theory means the cultural, political,

religious, economic and social dissimilarities between the two major communities, Hindus and Muslims of the
Subcontinent.
 This theory means that there were two nations in the

subcontinent, the Hindus and the Muslims.


Subcontinent consists of two different communities having their own philosophy of life.



This theory gave rise to two distinct political ideologies that was responsible for the partition of India into two independent states.

BASIS OF CREATION OF PAKISTAN
 The Two nation Theory was the basis of the struggle for

creation of Pakistan as an independent state.
 In spite of living together for centuries the two

communities did not forget their individual cultures and civilization.  It raised a direction for the Muslims on the basis of which

Pakistan was achieved.

FACTORS THAT SPLIT THE
SUBCONTINENT INTO TWO NATIONS
There are a few factors which split the inhabitants of the
SubContinent into two nations. Let us examine each of them separately.  Religious Differences


Hindu Nationalism



Cultural Differences



Social differences



Economic Differences



Educational Differences



Political Differences

 Language

RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES
 Islam preaches Tawheed (oneness of Allah) and believes that

Allah is the Creator of the universe.


Muslims are the believers of Allah , the Holy Prophet(P.B.U.H) the messenger of Allah.



Muslims firmly believe on the Holy book Quran(complete code of life)and the life hereafter.




Hindu believes in many gods. They have thousands of gods.
Hindus believe that prophets(or rishi)are people who see god. they teach about god. And they have characteristics of god.

 Their writings are called Vedas.

HINDU NATIONALISM
 A number of Hindu nationalist movements were started in

the subcontinent that added fuel to the fire, and increased the conflict between the two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation's economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Nationalism is an infantile disease, the measles of mankind." [Albert Einstein] Nationalism, to a far extent, can eat away and setback mankind, like a disease. When asked should either nationalism or internationalism be promoted in society, the following questions must be answered: How does a nation handle conflict? Are peoples subjugated? What are the consequences of nations being overly dependant on others? The answers to these questions are the driving force behind the ideologies of Internationalism and Nationalism. Internationalism is a focus on betterment of oneself while benefiting the world, and stresses cooperation and teamwork. Positives of internationalism include improved aid and development throughout the world, increased cooperation though collective security as well as increased growth through economic alliances. Conversely, internationalism can include a loss of sovereignty and independence that signals a turning away from self-sufficiency. International agreements may not always be honored, and it may leave a nation without the mutual defense it had counted upon. On the other side of the continuum lies nationalism, a belief that prioritizes one's nation over others, while other nations may benefit, it is indirect, unlike internationalism. Nationalism creates a unified society with one national identity, and leads to patriotism that can be brought about by a strong military presence. Nationalism stresses the importance of remaining independent and sovereign, but nations that discourage trade with other nations through tariffs can suffer economically. Also nationalistic territorial expansion tends to ignore the cultural needs of other nations, and this can lead to the subjugation of a cultural group. Upon analysis, this remains a complex issue, but the best way to cooperate between nations stems from effective use of internationalism. With internationalism, free trade can directly benefit a nations economy, and diplomatic negotiations before action…

    • 1218 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism can be a force for good, depending on how leaders choose to portray it.Nationalism gives a sense of belonging and unity, but somehow it still manages to divide individuals within a nation. In many cases nationalism is the evil to society, and can cause conflict between individuals within a nation.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humankind would be a better place if we were all just citizens of the world. In Martha Nussbaum’s “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism” she argues whether children should be taught in education to be patriotic or cosmopolitan. Nussbaum’s definition of cosmopolitanism is a person whose primary allegiance is to the community of human beings in the entire world. Nussbaum begins her argument by raising questions about education and how students ought to be taught that hunger in third world countries are problems of global problems and not the countries problem. She says “We should regard out deliberations as, first and foremost, deliberations about human problems of people in particular concrete situations, not problems growing out of a national identity that is altogether unlike that of others.”(P 1)…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christianity and Islam are very unique in their own way. Christians believed the Jesus Christ is God and the Savior; they believe that He was God as man. One the other hand Islam believed in the Prophet Muhammad, they did not think he was a God but just a prophet hence his name Prophet. This is hands down one of the biggest differences because lone religion believes that the person whom started their religion was a God and the other religion believe their starter was a very holy prophet.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The video, “A Tale of Two Political Systems”, investor and political scientist Eric X. Li speaks about the electoral democracy in the U.S. versus the one party system in China. Mr. Li presents different statics and views on why a one party system isn’t as bad as it seems. He then goes on to explain that a one party system has helped China become the second largest economy in the world and that their people are living in comfort. Mr. Li states this is possible because of three characteristics, adaptability, meritocracy, and legitimacy. He also points out the different components of the one party system and in China it takes candidates about 30 years of experience and career to become President. Mr. Li is very fund of the one party system and…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. ‘The growth of the nation-state, first in Western Europe and then elsewhere, has long been viewed as the key political development of this era [i.e. the sixteenth century].’ (Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks) Discuss with reference to at least two of the following: England, France, Spain.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A One-World Government

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A government that controls and governs the whole world, also known as a one-world government, seems like a very unconvincing idea. Though, as we advance into the future, signs of a one-world government are beginning to show. One sign that a one-world government may be coming is the forming of multi-national governments and international organizations. So how likely is it that a one-world government will occur? The possibility is highly likely that a one-world government will occur.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this chapter, D. Acemoglu and J.A. Robinson explain how growth under extractive institutions is not sustainable in the long term and always leads to the collapse, in one way or another, of these institutions. The title of the chapter, "I've seen the future and it works", is a quotation from the autobiography of Lincoln Steffens (1931). He was then speaking about the communist model that he had discovered on a diplomatic mission to Russia. The title of the chapter is of course ironic since it is well known that the Soviet System broke down in 1991. In this chapter the authors tackle different aspects of Extractive Institutions and explain throughout many concrete examples as to why the multiple facets of these institutions lead to the end of them. Extractive political and economical institutions are "structured to extract resources from the many by the few" and "concentrate power in the hand of a few, who will then have incentives to maintain and develop these institutions" (page 430). Dictatorship is the best example of an extractive institution as in this case power is concentrated in the hands of very few, if not only the dictator himself. These types of institutions are mostly founded in authoritarianism and totalitarianism political systems (dictatorship being an authoritarianism type…

    • 5470 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperialism was a very effective form of empowerment over weaker nations for early Britain and other European countries. They dominated and fought over whole continents and countries, arguing over who had conquered more land. There were many reasons why the European’s wanted to imperialize unindustrialized nations such as natural resources. This also made a big impact on said nations, positive and negative. Going on that state of mind, the long term effects of imperialism showed for decades after it really being assumed not an imperialistic state anymore.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johann Gottfried von Herder wrote much about nationalism. John Hobson wrote of imperialism, and Charles Darwin of natural selection and “survival of the fittest.” First I will discuss nationalism from Herder’s perspective. Second, I will discuss imperialism from Hobson’s perspective. Then Hobson writes about how nationalism leads to imperialism. Last, I will discuss the assumption that “nineteenth-century European societies were engaged in a struggle for existence among themselves?” There was a struggle, a great struggle between countries who were nationalist or imperialist. The struggle was because of competition. This is where Charles Darwin and his work of the struggle of existence ties Herder and Hobson’s opinions together.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This section will explain the two theories that have been used and how it relates to the theme of this study. The essence of this study is to determine how the British colonial system impacted on the indigenous socio-political system of the Igbo people of Southern Nigeria. Firstly, there will be a clear explanation of the usefulness of the theories of Imperialism and North-South relations to this study, followed by a subtle correlation with the theme of the study and finally how it applies here.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term state is interpreted as having many different meanings, all of which refer to the same concept. Max Weber defines a state as, “the organization that maintains a monopoly of violence over a territory” (O’Neil 28). That statement being somewhat confusing, many would just define a state as centralized power and authority. We have states because they are a set of institutions which carry out many things in order to establish order and policies within territories. It would not be possible to live without states because the protection, order, and security provided by states are needed. If people tried to live without them there would be mass chaos and disorder and very little or no protection from inside and outside threats. If states were to disappear in the future, new strains of technology may replace them. With the way technology is evolving and changing it is possible that the same tasks being performed by states today can be performed futuristically by newer technology, and possibly in a more convenient way. Regimes are also an important component to the larger framework of a state. The most important components that make up the regime of the United States are democracy and the government being that those foundations have a major role in establishing rules regarding collective equality and individual freedom. The formal written elements are things such as the constitution, state laws, taxes, and different policies that everyone must abide by. The informal and unwritten elements are things such as rules and regulations that may not necessarily be written, but everyone abides by the anyway because it is a part of the regime.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A view of fascism can be seen as a blend of nationalism and socialism since there are considerable numbers of concepts which link fascism to those two doctrines. It is certain that fascists have behaved like nationalists or in most cases, radical nationalists. First of all, fascists love the idea of uniting people into a single entity and revere the idea of nationhood because of its ability of uniting people who enjoy the common circumstances of birth. The Nazi form of fascism in particular insisted that it was the role of the state to serve the interests of the nation. As a result, fascism values the idea of organic society highly as nationalism does. Both doctrines believe that the common sense of nationality will bring a people together into a single whole which will stand above the individual; and fascists took this idea further by claiming that one should subordinate his interests and should obey the leader completely. Fascism can also be seen to have an obsession of warfare that demonstrates the nationalist's characteristics within themselves seeing the interests of the nation as rivalling against other nations; therefore, there is a need to be engaged in warfare in order to protect the nation from expansionist nations and to maintain the nation’s independence and self-determination of a people, especially in the Nazi form of fascism, they struggled to keep their race pure. More importantly, the love of warfare shows the fascists’ pride of their nation and their desire of expressing the nation’s superiority. For example, fascist Italy invaded Abyssinia in 1936 and Nazi Germany was willing to conquer all Slavic people during the early part of the twenties century’ these fascist movements were imperialistic and expansionist, both elements of right-wing nationalism.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    August, 14, 1947 and August, 15, 1947 the Indian partition of 1947 was created and it granted Indian its freedom from its 350 year of British ruling. After India’s freedom was granted it was divided into two states which were Dominion of Pakistan later known as Islamic republic of Pakistan and Union of India later known as Republic of India. Right after the partition of 1947, it declared that it was leader or King of the state to decide if the state should follow the Muslim or a Hindu religion. This Policy separated the people of India and Pakistan, and caused a lot of hatred between both sides. This policy also cause huge problems because some states would have a huge population of Hindus, and the king would be Muslim which made Hindus follow the beliefs and religious acts of the Muslims.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics