I don’t believe either the Biblical Maximalists or Biblical Minimalists are correct; the bible is not completely historically accurate, nor is it completely inaccurate. The bible, especially Genesis, may be based on some historical occurrences, but is exaggerated and includes untrue stories. I think stories in Genesis were created, based on some historical events to provide explanations to how and why we were created. The explanation couldn’t be disproven at the time, but now with Darwinism and the big bang theory, we see that the Creation Story and The Fall are not likely historically accurate. Based on the Black Sea flood theory we see proof of a large flood that occurred around the time the flood narrative was written about. This flood may be the basis for the flood narrative but it didn’t consume the entire Earth; this is where exaggeration of historical events can be seen in the bible. Did the writers of the four sources witness the flood themselves, or did word of the flood spread to them through others from that region? This is one of many questions you must ask when questioning the historical accuracy of the bible.
It can be seen through discrepancies in the bible’s text that it was written by different sources, and because of this it is difficult to determine which, if any, of these sources is historically accurate. Genesis contains stories similar to other mythology created at the time it was written, such as the Enuma Elish, which told a similar story to the Genesis creation story. Genesis may not be historically inaccurate, but that is not true for the entire bible. The Inscription of Hatshepsut, a tablet written in hieroglyphics, tells of a group of semitic pharaohs who exited Egypt around the time of a possible date of the exodus. The inscription could be the basis of the exodus, proving the Bible is not completely historically false.
Believing the bible is historically accurate is not immoral as long as it does not affect others. In the case of Israel and Palestine the Jews should have a right to live on the land because there is evidence that the exodus actually occurred. This does not mean the Palestinians should not have the right to live in Israel, and ideally they would share it. The sharing of Israel would most likely not work, so the Jews should have the right to the land because that is their ancestral homeland. Overall the bible may have some historically inaccurate stories, but in no way is it immoral to believe them.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Book of Genesis and The Epic of Gilgamesh has many similarities and differences. The stories are so similar that some people believe they are the same but just changed over time. There are speculations that the epic of Gilgamesh was written down first but we cannot be for certain. The Jewish, Muslim, and Christian religions all use this story in their holy books. The book of genesis could have very well have been written first or it was passed orally till someone wrote it down. So one story could have branched off and changed from one another or there could have been two floods. There are multiple possibilities to the origin of the stories. When people pass down stories orally things get changed from the original over a long period of time one could have changed the whole story. You can see the similarities of the stories that would make you think they were the same. Then when you break down the differences it makes it harder to believe that.…
- 509 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are few ancient documents that have survived the hardship of time. Actually, whether or not the writings are fiction or non-fiction, these literary works give a concept of what life was like in that time period. When similarities are discovered, they most likely point to real facts. The Biblical account of Noah’s flood and The Epic of Gilgamesh indicate that a real, disastrous flood literally did happen. While The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis flood documents are very different in multiple ways, they are surprisingly similar. Because of these fascinating parallels, there is actual reason to believe that a catastrophic global deluge did exist.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Standing proudly as two of the great pillars of world literature, particularly ancient world literature, the Book of Genesis and the Epic of Gilgamesh provide a great deal of insight into the nature of early human-animal relationships. In particular, the documentary hypothesis, which persuasively postulates that the Pentateuch is comprised of the writings of four different sources, means that the place and date of authorship of parts within the text (e.g. Genesis 1 and Genesis 2) vary significantly from each other. That said, it is a safe estimate that Genesis 1, which was written by the Priestly source, was composed in approximately 500 BCE by Jewish priests exiled in Babylon (Encyclopedia Britannica). Likewise, Genesis 2, written by the Yahwistic source, dates to around 950 BCE and was produced in Judaea (Encyclopedia…
- 1166 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
ix. Chapter Eight: Does It Matter Whether the Bible Is Historical? The Problem of History (2)…
- 3137 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The epic of Gilgamesh was also a very prominent story during its age and because of this it is believable that biblical writers knew the story of the much older flood but revised it so it could fit with their own religious history and world views. They very possibly intertwined the original story with their own mythology to help convey a message.…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Bible has authority in it as being the word of God. The authority the Bible comes from God that is given to the people by an inspiration and revelation by the power of the Holy Spirit from God. God said in His word that He is the Great I Am. Inspiration is nothing more than a revelation, or shall I say, a mere comforting and confirming word from God. As it states in John 16:33 "I have told you these things so that in me you may have peace, in this would you will have trouble. But take heart; I have overcome the world." Once inspiration has been given then we move into inerrancy; which is not demonstrable. This teaches you how to interpret things correctly. It helps us to tap into our faith to learn the hidden miracles and treasures that God has in the Bible. This is why it is very important, according to Proverbs 3:5-6 "to trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him and he will direct thy paths." In defending inerrancy I chose to stand behind the Biblical Argument because as it states in Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd ed; “The scriptures are the breath of god; which guaranteed they are without error." John 1:1 reads "In the beginning was the word, the word was with God, and the word was God." Just as God blew His (Ruah) breath into Adam to bring life to him; He did the same to the word when Jesus came down to the earth in the form of a baby. God is not a man that He should lie. He said in His word that Heaven and earth shall pass away but His word shall remain forever. The historical argument speaks from the church perspective as it related to doctrines and traditions such as the Sadducees and the Pharisee’s in the Old Testament as it pertained to the Sabbath. Nevertheless, epistemologies arguments have to be proven. Look at the resurrection of Jesus. In order for Thomas, a disciple whom walked with Jesus, was…
- 637 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The death, burial, and resurrection of Christ Jesus are at the crux of Christianity. In hind sight what seemed like foolishness to some on lookers has become the wisdom of God triumphing over evil by the death of His Christ Jesus on the cross. Like the stanza of a well known verse, Christ cried out, “God, my God, why have You forsaken me?” This cry from the cross on the day of His crucifixion was not a cry of defeat, on the contrary; it was a cry of victory in the ears of those familiar with the blessed twenty second Psalm written by His very namesake David the king, the priest, the psalmist. Victory…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This suggests that “The Story of the Flood,” from Genesis, was based off the original “Story of the Flood” from The Epic of Gilgamesh. In correspondence with time, the duration of the flood was a precise period of time in both texts. However, in The Epic of Gilgamesh, “For 6 days and 6 nights, the winds blew, torrents and tempests and the flood overwhelmed the world,” and in Genesis, “…the rain was upon the earth for 40 days and 40 nights,” (7:12). The time it took to build the ark was approximately seven days for Utnapishtim and up to one hundred years for Noah. The time period that these two renowned pieces of literature were written are important parts of information that affect the historical background and…
- 1009 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The first 39 books of the larger work called the Bible, is called the Old Testament. The Bible itself is arguably the best selling and most read book of all time, yet it’s well known to be quite challenging to read through and understand. The Old Testament portion of the Bible, notably the most difficult portion of the Bible for most to study and follow, yields 39 books from multiple authors, and spans over 4000 years of crucial world and church history. If that were not enough to take on, the Old Testament comes our way through multiple styles of authorship and formats, including but not limited to, books of history, law, proverbs, ethics, philosophy, treatises, dramas, songs, epics, biographies, and letters. There have been many books written and published to survey, explain, and/or bring to light the Old Testament, but none more helpful to me than the review subject of this paper, the work of Dr. Elmer L. Towns, entitled “A Journey Through the Old Testament”.…
- 2696 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to continue, the reader must be aware of my world view. I am a Christian. I also believe that the Bible is the inspired and inerrant word of God. I believe the Bible…
- 1283 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In our history, the Bible is a contribution to history that roots in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. It focuses on Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The Old Testament is the original Bible written by many different people with composite text. The Bible is a Monotheistic faith and is also impossible to date in time. This religion changed many people’s beliefs and traditions.…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that Worldview is seriously influenced by culture, knowledge, politics, religion and upbringing. Therefore, it is not uncommon to meet people who view the Bible as mythical literature. Hence there have been occasions when I have found myself in an intense debate about whether or not information in the Bible is real. As a result, there have been occasions…
- 3177 Words
- 13 Pages
Good Essays -
From the very beginning, the bible was based on word of mouth which can be easily stretched and distorted. It would have been easy for those in power to alter the words of the bible to what they wanted people to hear. Also, consider the location of The Garden of Eden and the Arch of the Covenant. The fact they have still been undiscovered leads the ultimate question. What elements of the bible were real and what was a figment of someoneś imagination? The extent of numerous people devoting their lives to searching for these locations and ending up with nothing makes me skeptical of what side I am on. It is difficult for myself to have faith in various stories that are misleading. How did Noah build an arch, that could hold every species of animal as well as various necessities?In the time period he was living, it would be impossible to build a boat that advanced, with the tools that were available. Although God guided him along the way, this story did not take account for the reality of the age they lived in. These flaws in the bible further my confliction to what I believe as…
- 601 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I was raised believing that the Bible was fact and was to be treated as such. That the individuals that wrote the Bible were in fact guided by God and therefore speaking the truth. I, however, find myself believing that the Bible is a very well written story depicting the behavior that the authors thought was appropriate for society during that time. I have difficulty believing that there was divine intervention in the writing of the Bible. The Christian worldview states that human problems are due to the fall of man in the Garden of Eden and have basically continued since that time. My belief is more that human problems stem from biological, mental, and physical complications and again have very little to do with a divine event. The solutions to human problems can only be fixed because of a change in the biological, mental, and physical world. I have little faith that believing in God and praying to him is all that is required to fix problems. I think more human, not divine, involvement is necessary to see real change. The Christian worldview would have you believe that the human purpose is to worship God, and worship all that he has given you. I think there is more to it than simply worshiping God, I don’t believe that our purpose alone is God. I believe He intended to give us a purpose other than purely…
- 1513 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In The Bible Among the Myths, Oswalt states, “If the historical basis on which the supposed revelation [the Bible] rested was false, then why should we give any special credence to the ideas resting on that basis” (p. 31). Please post a 400-word response to Oswalt’s statement. Seek to answer whether or not one could trust a historically false document to be theologically accurate? If not, why? If so, how? While sources are not required, you may support your answer from the Bible, your textbooks, or other sources as you see fit.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays