Preview

Truth in Sentencing

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1903 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Truth in Sentencing
Truth-in-sentencing debate
Learning Team B
CJA/204
November 26, 2012
Deana Bohenek

Truth-In-Sentencing Debate Opening Argument Truth-in-sentencing laws do not deter crime. The federal truth-in-sentencing law guarantees that certain violent offenders will serve at least 85% of their sentence (Schmalleger, 2012). However, if the offender acts accordingly in prison, he or she can attain parole for good behavior. What about the victims? Victims do not want to hear this. If an offender is sentenced for 30 years, the victim wants justice and wants to see the full 30 years served. They do not want to see the offender getting released after 25 years. The truth-in-sentencing laws are the judges’ guideline when choosing the sentence of the offender. The law is a structured guideline for sentencing the offenders. However, the judge can deviate from the guidelines if there are mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Look at plea bargaining, this is still a possibility even though there are truth-in-sentencing laws in place. The offender knows that if they get caught, they can plea bargain for a lesser sentence and be back out on the streets sooner. Let me say it again, truth-in-sentencing laws do not deter crime. The offenders know they will get out of prison soon through a plea bargain or parole. They know they can avoid serving the full sentence that the judge imposed on him or her. The only way to deter crime and reduce recidivism is to abolish the possibility of parole and ensure that the sentence the judge renders is carried out to full-term. Obviously, to take away the option for parole would mean that the prison populations would increase. Well, we should take the funds left over from overhead to run the parole division and build more prisons to house these offenders. The longer we keep them off the



References: Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2010, August). Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates, 2008-09.Bureau of Justice Statistics, Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/press/svpjri0809pr.cfm Chong, P. (2008, June 19). The Truth about 'Truth in Sentencing '. WAtoday. Retrieved from http://blogs.watoday.com.au/theverdict/2008/06/the_truth_about.html Ditton, P.M., & Wilson, D.J. (1999, January). Truth in Sentencing in State Prisons. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, (NCJ 170032). Retrieved from http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/tssp.pdf Gopnik, A. (2012, January 30). The Caging of America. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2012/01/30/12030crat_atlarge_gopnik Schmalleger, F. (2012). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century, 11th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ. Shepherd, J.M. (2002, October). Police, Prosecutors, Criminals, and Determinate Sentencing: The Truth about Truth-in-Sentencing Laws. Journal of Law and Economics, 45(2), 509-533. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1086/340644?uid=3739600&uid=2129&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101345982373 University of Alabama at Birmingham. (2005). Crime and Punishment. Retrieved from http://main.uab.edu/show.asp?durki=78147

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Seiter, R. P. (2008). The Role of Plea Bargaining and Sentencing. In R. P. Seiter, Corrections An Introduction 2nd Edition (pp. 47-48). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today 's sentencing includes imprisonment, fines, probation, and for serious offenses death. (Schamallenger, 2011). Sentencing has not…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes mandatory minimum sentences are the consequences of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make beneficial policy in society. One of the famous senior associate justice of the supreme court of the United have said the truth of federal mandatory sentencing, in which I used this quotation to relate to the topic that I’m about to discuss.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Models

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Across the nation several states have began to enact indeterminate sentences. These are also being called open-ended sentences. This is typically an attempt to impose longer sentences and to increase restrictions on high-risk criminals and sex offenders who have already served full sentences and are about to be released back in to society (Durling, 2006). Commonly, offenders are assigned a minimum sentence and a maximum sentence length. Around ninety days prior to the offenders minimum sentence is about to end a hearing takes place in front of an Indeterminate Sentencing Review Board. Here they will assess the offender’s probability of recidivism (Durling, 2006). At this board if the offender is found to be likely to re-offend he/she will be sentenced to a minimum of term of no longer than two years. This process of being reviewed is repeated until one of two things happens; either the offender “wins” the review board and is deemed ready to return to society, or the maximum term for the sentence has been served. Once released the offender has to meet certain…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sadly, many people have served time for crimes they did not commit. Unfortunately, this is an ongoing epidemic that has terrible consequences for the innocent people who are wrongfully accused and incarcerated. In class, we watched a video about a man who was convicted of burglary and rape in the first degree and sentenced to life plus fifty years. According to a reporter by the name of Lesley Stahl, who did a 60-minute Broadcast on this case, the individual who was wrongfully accused and convicted of this crime, endured 11 years in prison until he was finally exonerated of all charges and released from prison.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Grong, H. 2002. “A Personal Affair: Moral Obligation and the New Common Law Sentencing.” Retrieved November 2, 2009 from http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2009/05/attacking-the-federal-sentencing-guidelines-based-on-moral-obligations.html.…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Today, however, most Americans realize that innocent defendants are occasionally convicted, and that America 's criminal justice system has other deep-seated problems with administering equitable punishments.”…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “During the 19th and 20th centuries, individuals who broke the law were seen as the creation of social disorders, therefore punishment was considered to be justified only as of the following (1) it protected society by acting as a deterrent or by temporarily or permanently removing one who has injured it or (2) it aimed at the moral or social regeneration of the criminal.” (Bernard, 2014)…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Opponents and proponents of Three Strikes Laws argue vehemently for its effectiveness in deterring crime, and, conversely, for its ineffectiveness and economic imprudence. This study proposes to sift through the relevant constitutional amendments and examine the sentence structure of the law vis-à-vis fairness and justice. In short, does a Three Strikes Law sentencing structure achieve its goals without exceeding its authority?…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States criminal justice system prides itself on being fair and just. Even if it is one of the best systems in existence, it is not flawless. Wrongful convictions continue to occur despite existing safeguards aimed at limiting wrongful convictions. According to the Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, approximately 15% of inmates claim to be innocent nationwide (2014). Based on exoneration rates, of the 15% claiming innocence between one and five percent of inmates are truly innocent (Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, 2014). Several factors prevent wrongfully convicted individuals from proving his or…

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Schulhofer, S., 2004, PBS, Frontline, Benefits and Problems with Plea Bargains, Retrieved September 13, 2007 from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/plea/faqs/…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Desert

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer, R. (1978). If Favor of Presumptive Sentences Set by a Sentencing Commission. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://cad.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/24/4/401…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the past 3 years it shows from studies done around the country that 67% of inmates have gotten released and 57%of inmates have gotten arrested again either for the same crime they committed or for a new crime. In the past 30 years it has shown that sentencing has become more of longer sentences for punishment then for rehabilitation to help. Due to that a lot of prisons and jails have become over crowded. And less and less inmates have received the attention that they need to stop them from committing crimes. Honestly who wouldn’t want 3 free meals a day and roof over their head and not have to pay for anything? A lot of people don’t have places to go or things to eat so committing a crime and getting caught gives them…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays