Preview

Troubled Asset Relief Program

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Troubled Asset Relief Program
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)

Erick Jones

11/10/11

The Troubled Asset Relief Program, also known as TARP, was implemented in 2008 as a reaction to the unprecedented financial crisis that was troubling several Wall Street firms. In order to “relieve” the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in addition to these firms, the bailout was to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions in order to strengthen their financial sector. The bailout was later extended to include the automotive industry. The vast majority of the bailout funds were received by two companies, American International Group (AIG) and Citigroup respectively. AIG was one of the largest insurance companies in the United States and Citigroup was the largest bank in the US. There were many other banks which received funds from TARP in exchange for equity shares (Verret, 2011).
TARP authorized expenditures of $700 billion to bailout the financial industry. In order to make this program successful under EESA, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, the department of the treasury purchased enough interest in AIG, General Motors (GM), Chrysler, GMAC, as well as hundreds of national banks, to claim control (Verret, 2011). Even though EESA authorized the government to use $700 billion to enforce the purpose and objectives of the TARP program, that plan was quickly reconstituted into a number of different programs (Verret, 2011) . “As part of that bailout, the Treasury took preferred equity in TARP recipients and subsequently initiated a plan to convert those non-voting preferred shares into shares convertible into voting common equity. The Treasury’s initial experiment in holding common equity took place at Citigroup, in which it took a controlling thirty-four percent voting stake” (Verret, 2011). The Auto Industry Finance Program (AIFP) was introduced in late 2008 to help bailout the automotive industry with TARP support. Originally $17 billion



References: Couch, J. F., Burton, P. A., Malone, K. D., & Black, D. L. (2011). Government behind the wheel more a Matter of politics than of economics Gaby, M., & Walker, D. A. (2011). Impacts of TARP on financial institutions. Journal of Applied Finance, 21, 73-87. Grant, J. K. (2010). What the financial services industry puts together let no person put asunder: How The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act contributed to the 2008-2009 American capital markets crisis Horton, B. (2010). The TARP bailout of gm: A legal, historical, and literary critique. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 14, 217-276. Kroes, N. (2010). Competition policy and the crisis—the commission’s approach to banking and beyond Lawson, G. (2010). Burying the constitution under a TARP. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 33, 55-72. Levinson, M. (2009). The economic collapse. Dissent, 56, 61-66. S., K. (2009). US treasury needs to help TARP fraud. International Financial Law Review, 27, 11-11. Verret, J. W. (2011). Seperation of bank and state: Consolidating bailed-out companies into the U.S. debt ceiling and government financial statements

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A $180bn bailout; while Bank of America got $45bn as well as JP Morgan Chase…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This started with the company Bear Stearns declaring itself strapped of cash in March of 2008. Then Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two of the biggest housing loan agencies, were acquired by the federal government which rang bells throughout the economy that the ground was paving way right beneath their feet. What followed was a domino effect, with a succession of top investment banks and other financing houses either adopting bankruptcy or being bailed out by the government. The third approach taken by these companies to keep from collapsing within themselves was to request the Congress for a $700 billion bailout. Despite this and other initiatives adopted by the Bush administration, the…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In December 2008, the three major U.S. auto industry companies -- GM, Chrysler and Ford -- asked the government for a $34 billion bailout to avoid bankruptcy. The Big 3 stated that their demise would trigger 3 million layoffs within a year, plunging the economy further into recession.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Troubled Asset Relief Program as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act was an initiative signed into law on October 3, 2008 by then President George W. Bush. TARP authorized the U. S Treasury to purchase up to $700 billion in assets and securities from financial institutions in a response to a potential financial crisis and to stabilize the U.S financial markets. The big picture financial system of the nation is configured in such a way that it acts as the channel between corporations and individuals. Essentially the financial system is the system that enables lenders and borrowers to exchange funds. This is a process that takes place at all levels. Individuals, banks, insurance companies, and all manner of financial companies are borrowers and lenders to some degree. The ability of money to generate money is accomplished by taking deposits from other sources and lending them out at higher rates than the borrowing rates. This has become the basics of the U S economy. If for any reason the ability to continuously conduct these types of transaction were to be threatened, slowed or stopped the economy itself would suffer significantly and possibly halt as a result.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The private sector had to try and make it on their own. If the company was not important to strengthen of the economy they did not get bailout. The state the company is in they should try hard to make sure that company start an make a profit so they can stay in that state.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Government Bailout Benefits

    • 2934 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Sept. 7: The Treasury takes over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, putting them into a conservatorship and pledging up to $200 billion to back their…

    • 2934 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In September 2008, the American International Group, AIG, the largest insurance company in the United States, suffered from the bad debts incurred insuring mortgage-backed securities. As a result, within a matter of three months, AIG reported a startling quarterly loss of $61.7 billion, largest in the U.S corporate history. Instead of watching this global insurance giant fall on its keens, the U.S. government has decided to lend a helping hand by bailing out AIG. However, this generosity isn’t without a cost. Seven months and four bailout programs later, the American taxpayers are stuck with a bill for the amount of $182 billion, in return for 79.9% equity stake of the failing company. Soon after the bailout fund was received, the board of directors at AIG announced that the company will continue to reward its senior management and traders with the contractual $165 million bonus, the same group of people that caused the AIG collapse and global credit crisis in the first place.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three and a half years later, smaller financial institutions have been mostly unsuccessful in their efforts to exit TARP because they are having trouble procuring new capital to repay TARP funds, as the big banks are able to. The Wall Street Journal reported an estimate by Stonecastle partners, LLC, a New York firm that has invested in 800 community banks, that it will take $90 billion in fresh capital to clean up their balance sheets and acquire other institutions.7 In a quarterly report to congress, Christy Romero, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, reported this figure as well as a figure of only $23 billion in fresh capital for community banks to repay TARP or SBLF funds:…

    • 2807 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem with bailout is that it must be done promptly, correctly, and without any injustice or unfairness. Moreover, allocation of sufficient resources and setting of proper goals of policies are demanded. A bailout that the U.S. government issues through this subprime loan was criticized by people for caring more about saving banks and bankers than helping regular people. Although the bailout done by the government to save failing companies from this crisis was criticized by many people, some of the bailouts were necessary to protect the economy. Otherwise, it would destroy public confidence and possibly lead to systematic failure (Page…

    • 4798 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    *So with its $85 billion bailout of AIG, the Federal Reserve will come to run a predatory lending operation.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With nine thousand banks deteriorating succeeding the stock market crash, this was the worst financial crisis to date. With the Obama administration inheriting the second worst financial crisis, his first term, which began in 2008, was quite a trouble. Reversing the worst crisis, President Obama could have fell on, it was evident his first term would be nowhere easy. With increasing globalization and financial integration, capital account problems could make a country highly vulnerable to shocks. Manifestations of capital account problems could include declining foreign reserves, excessive short-term foreign debt, debt maturity and currency mismatches, and capital flight. (Lead indicators of a financial crisis). The financial crisis that erupted in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 led to a reconsideration of earlier policy approaches based on the self-regulating ability of markets. In particular, the role of anti-cyclical macroeconomic policies in sustaining the economy and jobs was widely acknowledged (IMF, 2009). In addition, unlike in earlier crises, social protection was reinforced and in particular the level and duration of unemployment benefits were improved – thereby departing from the view that higher benefits automatically aggravate market distortions (Howell,…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The combined revenues of the big five of Wall Street, i.e., Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, AIG, Merrill Lynch and Lehmann Brothers, added to $ 322 Billion in the year 2007. Compare it with the fact that GDP of 185 countries, including those of fairly developed countries such as Denmark and Greece, are less than those figures. These firms were so large that it was widely believed that they are unsusceptible to any kind of collapse. Things started going sour towards the end of 2006. But it was only during the last quarter of 2007 that the effect was largely felt with almost all these firms except Lehmann brothers posting losses. This can be characterized as "Privatization of Profits and Nationalization of Losses". American tax-payers were already engaged in a wide debate regarding the misuse of public money to the tune of $ 182 Billion when this issue has arisen where the government is using more than a trillion dollars to bail-out some of America's largest financial giants.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Aig Crisis

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The collapse of respected financial institutions such as Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers sent shock waves throughout the world economy. The crises at the U.S.-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac added to the financial disruption. Credit markets deteriorated rapidly, making it virtually impossible to access capital. In September, AIG’s credit ratings…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bank Bailout

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The banks were in deep trouble and by the government intervening and bailing them out, they got the economy back up on their feet. These industries were just ‘’too big to fail.’’ Opponents like to argue that the government wasted money foolishly on the bailout however, according to the Center for Automotive Research, a Detroit-based think tank ‘’it’s a heck of a lot better though than the $108 billion to $156 billion the government would have lost over three years if it hadn’t intervened.’’ (Doc. 1) In making this statement the Center for Automotive Research proves that the government should’ve bailed out troubled industries because it saved them, as well as it saved the banks. TARP, the Troubled Assets Relief Program was created in October of 2008 and its purpose was to help stabilize the economy. Although Robert J Samuelson is correct in stating that ‘’A Bloomberg poll last October asked how TARP had affected the economy. Forty-three percent of respondents said it weakened the economy; 21 percent said it made no difference; only 24 percent said it helped’’…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    FCIC. (n.d.). GET THE REPORT. Retrieved November 28, 2013, from Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission: http://fcic.law.stanford.edu/…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics