Preview

Treaty of Waitangi

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Treaty of Waitangi
The Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti O Waitangi)

The Treaty of Waitangi (Māori: Te Tiriti o Waitangi) was a treaty signed by representatives of the British Crown and various Māori chiefs of the North Island of New Zealand. Te Tiriti O Waitangi was first signed on the 6th of February 1840. The treaty’s regulations had

• Inaugurated a British Governor of New Zealand (the throne’s representative in a commonwealth country)
• Let other people live in New Zealand (such as Dutch, Europeans, Asians etc.)
• Let the British make the rules and that everyone who is in the country must obey them
• Recognised Māori ownership of their native land, territories, fisheries and all other properties as well as giving them exclusive access to these areas

The treaty was written in both English and Māori, but both versions differ significantly, so there is no consensus as to the exact terms & conditions of the treaty. The reason why this havoc was created was, because Captain William Hobson, who had brought written instructions from the Colonial Secretary, Lord Normanby to James Busby, the British resident residing in New Zealand. Busby then transported the instructions to Hobson’s secretary James Freeman, who did the actual drafting from those instructions. The draft which was written by Freeman, was now given to Reverend Henry Williams, a Christian British missionary who had lived in New Zealand for more than 20 years, and his son Edward Williams, who then translated the English draft into Māori. After the draft had been translated into an actual document in Māori, the English version of the draft had disappeared.

The Williams translation, which is now what is known as Te Tiriti O Waitangi, was the document that was agreed to the 6th of February 1840 and thereafter. A subsequent version, which was now the English language version of the document, was written in March 1840, which is why there are many differences from the two.

From the Commonwealth

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    claim settlement ever. Its "often referred to as Canada 's first modern land claim agreement" (…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Here it frankly states the true reason behind the Reciprocity Treaty. They weren’t trying to help Hawaii in anyway. They made this treaty to boost the economy in the U.S. And the Hawaiian people bought it at first, only seeing it for what the United States deceived them into seeing. The Hawaiian government just trusted the “good faith” of America to honour the sovereignty they thought they had established…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Thomas Jefferson Bible is a revised version of the Bible that was edited by the United States President, Thomas Jefferson, in the year 1804. It was during one winter evening in White House, which he decided to cut up parts of the bible and paste them in a blank folio. He only told his closest of friends about his doings. However, this original version later on got lost, never to be traced again (Jefferson, pg. 98). After retirement, Jefferson continued with his quest in 1820, to edit the bible. He made copies of the edited bible in four different languages; English, French, Greek and…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANZUS Treaty – This treaty was signed by Australia, New Zealand and the United States in 1951. The terms of the treaty stated that if any of the countries were attacked, they would come together and decide on an appropriate response. This was also a way for Australia to strengthen its alliance with the US. The treaty changed in 1986 when the US suspended its treaty to New Zealand because NZ had not allowed the entry of US ships believing them to be nuclear-powered.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Native title refers to individual or communal, rights or interests of Aboriginal people or Torres Strait Islanders in relation to waters or land. This form of land title was considered to be of great significance to Aboriginal people because it allowed them to gain social and economic independence, and was a huge leap in their journey of self determination. It aimed to assist the establishment of native title by organising the Mabo decision. In the end, Aboriginal people want to own their sacred sites, and this can only be achieved through the Native Title.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “BECAUSE it is proposed by said treaty to confiscate said property, technically called the crown lands, those legally entitled thereto, either now or in succession, receiving no consideration whatever for estates, their title to which has been always undisputed, and which is legitimately in my name at this date.” In this quotation from the letter written from Queen Liliuokalani to the president of the United States, Pres. McKinney, in 1897, states that the islands of Hawaii, also known as the crown lands, are still legally entitled to her. That she is the rightful ruler and that the title of queen is still hers. The counter claim to this, however, is that even though Queen Liliuokalani did inherit the throne of Hawaii in 1891, the Americans, if they have the power to do so, can still take the Hawaiians Independence from them.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The final version of the declaration was probably deleted because, he could've took it in consideration that he was a slave owner himself and that it'll bring attention on him for being a hypocrite. I don't think he was ready for the responsibility and drama that would come with it.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of owning land was a completely new idea for the Hawaiian people. This "land ownership" idea was a major demand from foreigners. To the Hawaiian people, land belonged to the gods. People were not meant to own land, just care for it. Foreigners were very frustrated with the fact that they needed permission from the king to build a house, church, etc… Even then it could be revoked and the house or church would be ripped to the ground. Some of these foreigners acted as they did own the land that they lived on and expected their home governments to back them up. On November 16th, 1836 British war ships came to Hawaii with a treaty attempting to solve the land disagreements.…

    • 673 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British government has violated the constitution rights of Englishmen and we need to take action. This is the only way for us to be away from Great Britain and if you have the great americans…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In Hawaii

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In response to her people, she started working on a constitution that would place power back in the hands of the monarchy, and restore the native’s ability to vote. The businessmen on the island, most prominently Sanford B. Dole, seized power, and imprisoned queen Liliuokalani. The business people wanted Hawaii annexed from the US. This would remove taxes on imports from Hawaii, and put a large sum of money in the hands of Dole and his cohorts. Up until that point, Hawaii had enjoyed a tariff free favoured trade status, thanks to a treaty signed in 1875. The McKinley tariff in 1890 drastically raised the price of…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Land Rights movement are of critical importance in relation to Aboriginal spirituality, as it acknowledges and establishes kayini/ the inextricable connection between Indigenous people and their land, in which they have lost due to the European settlement. Hence, it is the attempt of Indigenous people reclaiming possession of their land which forms their sense of identity and purpose. Native Title is a legal term recognising the rights of Indigenous peoples and s to use and occupy their lands for traditional purposes, such as ceremonies including initiation ceremony. Thus providing a continued connection with the land. However, as suggested by John Sosso, there is ‘always room for improvement’. This indicates to Australians that there are…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal fiction upon which Australia was founded refers to the British doctrine, “terra nullius”. The phrase translates to “land without ownership”. When Australia was founded, even though the colonisers acknowledged the presence of the Indigenous they considered the Aboriginals too primitive to be actual owners. The Aboriginals were considered too primitive with no identifiable hierarchy or political structure. This legal fiction had a significant impact on Australia with the widely known Mabo Case. In May 1982, Eddie Mabo and four other plaintiffs of the Murray Islands pursued confirmation of their traditional land rights in the High Court of Australia. Their claim had been that Murray Island (Mer) had been previously inhabited and had been possessed by the Meriam people with their own social and political organisations. After 10 years and the death of Mabo, on June 3 1992, the High Court ruled that the lands of Australia were not terra nullius when European settlement occurred and the Meriam people were entitled to the lands of Murray Island. Then in December 1993, the Native Title Act was produced as part of the Commonwealth’s response to the High Court’s decision to protect the native lands of Aboriginals. The legal fiction has therefore had a major impact on Australia’s legal history with the introduction of the Native Title Act where the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were compensated for the dispossession of their lands.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The annexation of Hawaii is connected to foreign policy because the U.S. dealt with Hawaii by annexing it and making it a state.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Native title is a legal right on Indigenous Australian Communities to live on and use land with which they have an ongoing association. Native title has been an issue as its difficult determining whether Australia was ‘terra nullius’ and it wasn’t the Indigenous ad to prove they have traditional links with the land. The conditions that have led to reform to the ‘terra nullius’ claim were by aboriginal activists challenging Australian sovereignty on the grounds that terra nullius was applied improperly. Mechanisms that have been put into action are the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) which was enacted by the Mabo cases and the Native Title Amendment 1998 (Cwlth) by the Wik case.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term ‘Native Title’ refers to the right of Indigenous people to their traditional land. In Australia it has a legal significance of the right to an area of land, claimed by people whose ancestors were the original inhabitants of the land before European settlement. Also who can prove that they have had a continuous connection with the land. Native Title is the term given by the High Court to Indigenous land rights by the Court in Mabo and others v State of Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23. The case required the High Court to consider the legality of the ‘doctrine of terra nullius’ – land belonging to no one. This was the legal concept of that when the first Europeans came to Australia the land was owned by no one and thus was open to settlement. The High Court ruled in favour of Mabo and overturned the concept of ‘terra nullius’. This effectively resulted in the introduction of native title legislation to Australia.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics